Presentism: Difference between revisions
imported>Boris Tsirelson m (typo) |
mNo edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| author = Douglas L. Wilson | | author = Douglas L. Wilson | ||
| url = http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/96oct/obrien/charactr.htm}}</ref></blockquote> | | url = http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/96oct/obrien/charactr.htm}}</ref></blockquote> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist|2}} | {{reflist|2}}[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] |
Latest revision as of 16:00, 6 October 2024
The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines presentism generally, as "an attitude toward the past dominated by present-day attitudes and experiences."[1] In historiography, it is used more narrowly, to judge ethical behavior or terminology based on modern usage, rather than the usage familiar to the subjects of the discussion.
In writing on American history, presentism often is applied to the slaveholding of 18th century figures such as Thomas Jefferson and George Washington.
It is a measure of the change that has occurred in the past thirty years that the one thing Jefferson's children nowadays are most likely to associate with him, apart from his authorship of the Declaration of Independence, is a sexual liaison with one of his slaves, Sally Hemings. College teachers are often dismayed to discover that many if not most of their students now regard this as an accepted fact. But this is not all. In the prevailing ethos of the sexual revolution, Jefferson's supposed liaison is widely received with equanimity and seems to earn him nothing more reproachful than a knowing smile. [2]
References
- ↑ "Presentism", Merriam-Webster Dictionary
- ↑ Douglas L. Wilson (November 1992), "Thomas Jefferson and the Character Issue", The Atlantic Monthly