Talk:Hypothesis/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Eric Toombs No edit summary |
imported>John Stephenson m (John Stephenson moved page Talk:Hypothesis to Talk:Hypothesis/Archive 1 without leaving a redirect: Discussion about a different article merged with this one) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{archive box}} | |||
== Merger with [[Hypothesis]] == | == Merger with [[Hypothesis]] == | ||
Immediately after having written this, I have decided to merge this into [[Hypothesis]], which incidentally could use a lot of work as well. I don't know how to do so, though.<br/> | Immediately after having written this, I have decided to merge this into [[Hypothesis]], which incidentally could use a lot of work as well. I don't know how to do so, though.<br/> | ||
[[User:Eric Toombs|Eric Toombs]] 04:23, 19 October 2010 (UTC) | [[User:Eric Toombs|Eric Toombs]] 04:23, 19 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
:(Irrespective of the merger) Interestingly, falsifiabilty was also mentioned (by me, not long ago) in [[Entanglement (physics)#Falsifiabilty, and no-conspiracy assumption]]. [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 22:00, 19 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:36, 6 October 2020
Merger with Hypothesis
Immediately after having written this, I have decided to merge this into Hypothesis, which incidentally could use a lot of work as well. I don't know how to do so, though.
Eric Toombs 04:23, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- (Irrespective of the merger) Interestingly, falsifiabilty was also mentioned (by me, not long ago) in Entanglement (physics)#Falsifiabilty, and no-conspiracy assumption. Boris Tsirelson 22:00, 19 October 2010 (UTC)