Talk:Script kiddie: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Thomas Wright Sulcer (Logic behind article) |
imported>Sandy Harris No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
==Ported article== | ==Ported article== | ||
This is one of WPs top articles -- 11th in traffic in Dec 2009. I ported it, rewrote it, added new information, deleted other information (specific references to malicious programs) and spruced it up hopefully.--[[User:Thomas Wright Sulcer|Thomas Wright Sulcer]] 18:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC) | This is one of WPs top articles -- 11th in traffic in Dec 2009. I ported it, rewrote it, added new information, deleted other information (specific references to malicious programs) and spruced it up hopefully.--[[User:Thomas Wright Sulcer|Thomas Wright Sulcer]] 18:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Nothing wrong with having writeups on malicious programs, but they would be best in independent articles, since there are many reasons to link to them. I'd start with some of the more historic ones against which there should be solid defenses, such as the Morris worm and Slammer, which can be used as detailed case studies. --[[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 19:33, 26 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
==We really, really need a security subgroup== | |||
I'd start, but I'm in and out of bed with a bad cold. Minimally: | |||
*Computers | |||
*Sociology and/or psychology (I think both) | |||
*Law | |||
*Military | |||
*Economics (if that's where we are putting accounting and audit) | |||
--[[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 19:33, 26 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
: We now have such a subgroup, thanks to Howard. I've just added this article. [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 13:11, 5 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:11, 5 March 2010
Ported article
This is one of WPs top articles -- 11th in traffic in Dec 2009. I ported it, rewrote it, added new information, deleted other information (specific references to malicious programs) and spruced it up hopefully.--Thomas Wright Sulcer 18:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Nothing wrong with having writeups on malicious programs, but they would be best in independent articles, since there are many reasons to link to them. I'd start with some of the more historic ones against which there should be solid defenses, such as the Morris worm and Slammer, which can be used as detailed case studies. --Howard C. Berkowitz 19:33, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
We really, really need a security subgroup
I'd start, but I'm in and out of bed with a bad cold. Minimally:
- Computers
- Sociology and/or psychology (I think both)
- Law
- Military
- Economics (if that's where we are putting accounting and audit)
--Howard C. Berkowitz 19:33, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- We now have such a subgroup, thanks to Howard. I've just added this article. Sandy Harris 13:11, 5 March 2010 (UTC)