Heart rate: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Robert Badgett No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
(12 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[[Bradycardia]] is the condition in which the heart rate is below normal; in [[tachycardia]], it is above normal. | [[Bradycardia]] is the condition in which the heart rate is below normal; in [[tachycardia]], it is above normal. | ||
In [[pharmacology]], a drug's affect on heart rate may be predictive of the drugs | ==Genetics== | ||
The heritability of the resting heart rate is about 40%, perhaps due to variations in the [[adrenergic receptor]].<ref name="pmid11854867">{{cite journal| author=Ranade K, Jorgenson E, Sheu WH, Pei D, Hsiung CA, Chiang FT et al.| title=A polymorphism in the beta1 adrenergic receptor is associated with resting heart rate. | journal=Am J Hum Genet | year= 2002 | volume= 70 | issue= 4 | pages= 935-42 | pmid=11854867 | doi=10.1086/339621 | pmc=PMC379121 | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=11854867 }} </ref> | |||
==Pharmacology== | |||
In [[pharmacology]], a drug's affect on heart rate may be predictive of the drugs: | |||
* Benefit in treating | |||
** Heart failure<ref name="pmid19487713">{{cite journal |author=McAlister FA, Wiebe N, Ezekowitz JA, Leung AA, Armstrong PW |title=Meta-analysis: beta-blocker dose, heart rate reduction, and death in patients with heart failure |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=150 |issue=11 |pages=784–94 |year=2009 |month=June |pmid=19487713 |doi= |url=http://www.annals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=19487713 |issn=}}</ref> | |||
** [[Myocardial infarction]] <ref name="pmid17981830">{{cite journal |author=Cucherat M |title=Quantitative relationship between resting heart rate reduction and magnitude of clinical benefits in post-myocardial infarction: a meta-regression of randomized clinical trials |journal=Eur. Heart J. |volume=28 |issue=24 |pages=3012–9 |year=2007 |month=December |pmid=17981830 |doi=10.1093/eurheartj/ehm489 |url=http://eurheartj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=17981830 |issn=}}</ref> | |||
* Equivocal results in treating | |||
** Harm <ref name="pmid19017516">{{cite journal |author=Bangalore S, Sawhney S, Messerli FH |title=Relation of beta-blocker-induced heart rate lowering and cardioprotection in hypertension |journal=J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. |volume=52 |issue=18 |pages=1482–9 |year=2008 |month=October |pmid=19017516 |doi=10.1016/j.jacc.2008.06.048 |url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0735-1097(08)02724-1 |issn=}}</ref> and benefit<ref name="pmid18375982">{{cite journal |author=Kolloch R, Legler UF, Champion A, ''et al.'' |title=Impact of resting heart rate on outcomes in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease: findings from the INternational VErapamil-SR/trandolapril STudy (INVEST) |journal=Eur. Heart J. |volume=29 |issue=10 |pages=1327–34 |year=2008 |month=May |pmid=18375982 |doi=10.1093/eurheartj/ehn123 |url=http://eurheartj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=18375982 |issn=}}</ref> in treating [[hypertension]]. The INVEST trial used [[atenolol]] ''twice'' a day if 50 mg once per day did not control pressure.<ref name="pmid14657064">{{cite journal |author=Pepine CJ, Handberg EM, Cooper-DeHoff RM, ''et al.'' |title=A calcium antagonist vs a non-calcium antagonist hypertension treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery disease. The International Verapamil-Trandolapril Study (INVEST): a randomized controlled trial |journal=JAMA |volume=290 |issue=21 |pages=2805–16 |year=2003 |month=December |pmid=14657064 |doi=10.1001/jama.290.21.2805 |url=http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=14657064 |issn=}}</ref> In this study atenolol had similar outcomes to other [[Antihypertensive|antihypertensive agent]]s; however patients were included if they had [[coronary heart disease]] and benefit was confined to patients with prior [[myocardial infarction]].<ref name="pmid18375982">{{cite journal |author=Kolloch R, Legler UF, Champion A, ''et al.'' |title=Impact of resting heart rate on outcomes in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease: findings from the INternational VErapamil-SR/trandolapril STudy (INVEST) |journal=Eur. Heart J. |volume=29 |issue=10 |pages=1327–34 |year=2008 |month=May |pmid=18375982 |doi=10.1093/eurheartj/ehn123 |url=http://eurheartj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=18375982 |issn=}}</ref> | |||
* Conflicting evidence for [[perioperative care]] suggesting both harm<ref name="pmid18029345">{{cite journal |author=Biccard BM, Sear JW, Foëx P |title=Meta-analysis of the effect of heart rate achieved by perioperative beta-adrenergic blockade on cardiovascular outcomes |journal=Br J Anaesth |volume=100 |issue=1 |pages=23–8 |year=2008 |month=January |pmid=18029345 |doi=10.1093/bja/aem331 |url=http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=18029345 |issn=}}</ref> and, in a more complicated analysis that transformed variables and used both mean and maximum heart rates, benefit<ref name="pmid18349171">{{cite journal |author=Beattie WS, Wijeysundera DN, Karkouti K, McCluskey S, Tait G |title=Does tight heart rate control improve beta-blocker efficacy? An updated analysis of the noncardiac surgical randomized trials |journal=Anesth. Analg. |volume=106 |issue=4 |pages=1039–48 |year=2008 |month=April |pmid=18349171 |doi=10.1213/ane.0b013e318163f6a9 |url=http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=18349171 |issn=}}</ref>. Neither analysis included the more recent POISE or DECREASE IV trials.<ref name="pmid19474688">{{cite journal |author=Dunkelgrun M, Boersma E, Schouten O, ''et al.'' |title=Bisoprolol and fluvastatin for the reduction of perioperative cardiac mortality and myocardial infarction in intermediate-risk patients undergoing noncardiovascular surgery: a randomized controlled trial (DECREASE-IV) |journal=Ann. Surg. |volume=249 |issue=6 |pages=921–6 |year=2009 |month=June |pmid=19474688 |doi=10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a77d00 |url=http://meta.wkhealth.com/pt/pt-core/template-journal/lwwgateway/media/landingpage.htm?issn=0003-4932&volume=249&issue=6&spage=921 |issn=}}</ref><ref name="pmid18479744">{{cite journal |author=Devereaux PJ, Yang H, Yusuf S, ''et al.'' |title=Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomised controlled trial |journal=Lancet |volume=371 |issue=9627 |pages=1839–47 |year=2008 |month=May |pmid=18479744 |doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60601-7 |url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140-6736(08)60601-7 |issn=}}</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/>[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] |
Latest revision as of 11:01, 26 August 2024
In physiology, the heart rate is "the number of times the heart ventricles contract per unit of time, usually per minute."[1] This may have to be presented as an average in the presence of arrythmias, such as heart block, when some contractions are missed.
Bradycardia is the condition in which the heart rate is below normal; in tachycardia, it is above normal.
Genetics
The heritability of the resting heart rate is about 40%, perhaps due to variations in the adrenergic receptor.[2]
Pharmacology
In pharmacology, a drug's affect on heart rate may be predictive of the drugs:
- Benefit in treating
- Heart failure[3]
- Myocardial infarction [4]
- Equivocal results in treating
- Harm [5] and benefit[6] in treating hypertension. The INVEST trial used atenolol twice a day if 50 mg once per day did not control pressure.[7] In this study atenolol had similar outcomes to other antihypertensive agents; however patients were included if they had coronary heart disease and benefit was confined to patients with prior myocardial infarction.[6]
- Conflicting evidence for perioperative care suggesting both harm[8] and, in a more complicated analysis that transformed variables and used both mean and maximum heart rates, benefit[9]. Neither analysis included the more recent POISE or DECREASE IV trials.[10][11]
References
- ↑ Anonymous (2024), Heart rate (English). Medical Subject Headings. U.S. National Library of Medicine.
- ↑ Ranade K, Jorgenson E, Sheu WH, Pei D, Hsiung CA, Chiang FT et al. (2002). "A polymorphism in the beta1 adrenergic receptor is associated with resting heart rate.". Am J Hum Genet 70 (4): 935-42. DOI:10.1086/339621. PMID 11854867. PMC PMC379121. Research Blogging.
- ↑ McAlister FA, Wiebe N, Ezekowitz JA, Leung AA, Armstrong PW (June 2009). "Meta-analysis: beta-blocker dose, heart rate reduction, and death in patients with heart failure". Ann. Intern. Med. 150 (11): 784–94. PMID 19487713. [e]
- ↑ Cucherat M (December 2007). "Quantitative relationship between resting heart rate reduction and magnitude of clinical benefits in post-myocardial infarction: a meta-regression of randomized clinical trials". Eur. Heart J. 28 (24): 3012–9. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm489. PMID 17981830. Research Blogging.
- ↑ Bangalore S, Sawhney S, Messerli FH (October 2008). "Relation of beta-blocker-induced heart rate lowering and cardioprotection in hypertension". J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 52 (18): 1482–9. DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.06.048. PMID 19017516. Research Blogging.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Kolloch R, Legler UF, Champion A, et al. (May 2008). "Impact of resting heart rate on outcomes in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease: findings from the INternational VErapamil-SR/trandolapril STudy (INVEST)". Eur. Heart J. 29 (10): 1327–34. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn123. PMID 18375982. Research Blogging.
- ↑ Pepine CJ, Handberg EM, Cooper-DeHoff RM, et al. (December 2003). "A calcium antagonist vs a non-calcium antagonist hypertension treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery disease. The International Verapamil-Trandolapril Study (INVEST): a randomized controlled trial". JAMA 290 (21): 2805–16. DOI:10.1001/jama.290.21.2805. PMID 14657064. Research Blogging.
- ↑ Biccard BM, Sear JW, Foëx P (January 2008). "Meta-analysis of the effect of heart rate achieved by perioperative beta-adrenergic blockade on cardiovascular outcomes". Br J Anaesth 100 (1): 23–8. DOI:10.1093/bja/aem331. PMID 18029345. Research Blogging.
- ↑ Beattie WS, Wijeysundera DN, Karkouti K, McCluskey S, Tait G (April 2008). "Does tight heart rate control improve beta-blocker efficacy? An updated analysis of the noncardiac surgical randomized trials". Anesth. Analg. 106 (4): 1039–48. DOI:10.1213/ane.0b013e318163f6a9. PMID 18349171. Research Blogging.
- ↑ Dunkelgrun M, Boersma E, Schouten O, et al. (June 2009). "Bisoprolol and fluvastatin for the reduction of perioperative cardiac mortality and myocardial infarction in intermediate-risk patients undergoing noncardiovascular surgery: a randomized controlled trial (DECREASE-IV)". Ann. Surg. 249 (6): 921–6. DOI:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a77d00. PMID 19474688. Research Blogging.
- ↑ Devereaux PJ, Yang H, Yusuf S, et al. (May 2008). "Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomised controlled trial". Lancet 371 (9627): 1839–47. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60601-7. PMID 18479744. Research Blogging.