Northern Rhodesia: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Caesar Schinas
m (Bot: Delinking years)
mNo edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 34: Line 34:


===Economic recovery===
===Economic recovery===
Despite the economic crash, the large firms were still able to maintain a [[profit and loss|profit]]. The fact that unemployed workers had left meant there were no increases in [[taxation]], and labour costs remained low. At a 1932 conference of copper producers in [[New York]] the Rhodesian companies objected to further market intervention, and when no agreement could be made, the previous restrictions on competition lapsed. This placed the Northern Rhodesians in a very powerful position.  
Despite the economic crash, the large firms were still able to maintain a [[profit and loss|profit]]. The fact that unemployed workers had left meant there were no increases in [[taxation]], and labour costs remained low. At a 1932 conference of copper producers in [[New York (disambiguation)|New York]] the Rhodesian companies objected to further market intervention, and when no agreement could be made, the previous restrictions on competition lapsed. This placed the Northern Rhodesians in a very powerful position.  


Meanwhile the British South Africa Company sold its remaining Southern Rhodesian holdings to the Southern Rhodesian government in 1933 giving it the capital to invest in developing other mines. It negotiated an agreement between Rhodesian Railways and the copper mine companies for exclusive use, and used resources freed up to buy a major stake in the Anglo American Corporation. By the end of the [[1930s]], Northern Rhodesian copper mining was booming.
Meanwhile the British South Africa Company sold its remaining Southern Rhodesian holdings to the Southern Rhodesian government in 1933 giving it the capital to invest in developing other mines. It negotiated an agreement between Rhodesian Railways and the copper mine companies for exclusive use, and used resources freed up to buy a major stake in the Anglo American Corporation. By the end of the [[1930s]], Northern Rhodesian copper mining was booming.
Line 54: Line 54:
The African miners got to hear of the settlement unofficially and rumours that wage increases of £4 per day circulated; despite increasing African bonus payments, the Africans in Nkana mine went on strike. When many turned up to collect their pay for work before going on strike, the diehard strikers assumed they were reporting for work and a confrontation began which quickly escalated into a riot in which troops opened fire. Thirteen were killed. Another Commission of Inquiry found that conditions at Nkana and Mufulira had little changed from 1935, although at [[Nchanga]] and [[Roan Antelope]] no strike had happened. <ref name="COI2">{{cite book |title = Report of the Commission Appointed to Inquire into the Disturbances in the Copperbelt, Northern Rhodesia, July 1940 | publisher = Government Printer | location = Lusaka}}</ref>
The African miners got to hear of the settlement unofficially and rumours that wage increases of £4 per day circulated; despite increasing African bonus payments, the Africans in Nkana mine went on strike. When many turned up to collect their pay for work before going on strike, the diehard strikers assumed they were reporting for work and a confrontation began which quickly escalated into a riot in which troops opened fire. Thirteen were killed. Another Commission of Inquiry found that conditions at Nkana and Mufulira had little changed from 1935, although at [[Nchanga]] and [[Roan Antelope]] no strike had happened. <ref name="COI2">{{cite book |title = Report of the Commission Appointed to Inquire into the Disturbances in the Copperbelt, Northern Rhodesia, July 1940 | publisher = Government Printer | location = Lusaka}}</ref>


There was an election in 1941. [[Roy Welensky]], a railway [[trade union]] leader who had been elected in 1938, set up the Northern Rhodesian Labour Party as a party favouring amalgamation. All its five candidates were elected. This development was spotted in [[London]] where [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour Party]] MPs were concerned that the demand, if granted, would diminish the position of the Africans of Northern Rhodesia.  
There was an election in 1941. [[Roy Welensky]], a railway [[trade union]] leader who had been elected in 1938, set up the Northern Rhodesian Labour Party as a party favouring amalgamation. All its five candidates were elected. This development was spotted in [[London, United Kingdom|London]] where [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour Party]] MPs were concerned that the demand, if granted, would diminish the position of the Africans of Northern Rhodesia.  


Later in the war, the British government's [[Ministry of Supply]] entered into agreements with the Northern Rhodesian and Canadian copper mines to supply all the copper needed by the armed forces for set prices. This removed free competition and therefore kept prices down; as British companies, the main copper producers were also subject to the Excess Profits Tax. However they did have a guaranteed market, and in 1943 the Ministry of Supply paid half of the cost of an expansion programme planned for the Nchanga mine.
Later in the war, the British government's [[Ministry of Supply]] entered into agreements with the Northern Rhodesian and Canadian copper mines to supply all the copper needed by the armed forces for set prices. This removed free competition and therefore kept prices down; as British companies, the main copper producers were also subject to the Excess Profits Tax. However they did have a guaranteed market, and in 1943 the Ministry of Supply paid half of the cost of an expansion programme planned for the Nchanga mine.
Line 315: Line 315:


* [http://www.greatnorthroad.org/ The Great North Road]: Northern Rhodesians Worldwide.
* [http://www.greatnorthroad.org/ The Great North Road]: Northern Rhodesians Worldwide.
* [http://www.nrzam.org.uk/ Northern Rhodesia and Zambia]: Photographs and Information from the Fifties and Sixties.
* [http://www.nrzam.org.uk/ Northern Rhodesia and Zambia]: Photographs and Information from the Fifties and Sixties.[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]]

Latest revision as of 06:00, 27 September 2024

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable, developed Main Article is subject to a disclaimer.

Northern Rhodesia was a British protectorate in south central Africa, created in 1911 by combining North-Western Rhodesia and North-Eastern Rhodesia, which were controlled by the British South Africa Company. From 1924 the administration came under the United Kingdom government, and Northern Rhodesia became independent in 1964 as Zambia.

Originally colonized by Cecil Rhodes partly to join up Nyasaland with Southern Rhodesia and partly to provide a reserve of native labour for Southern Rhodesia, the protectorate came into its own when its reserves of minerals (especially Copper) were discovered. Despite the wishes of the European settlers, the United Kingdom government considered that the protectorate should be run in the interests of the African population and moved to increase their political power.

History

British South Africa Company

The geographical, as opposed to political, term "Rhodesia" refers to a region generally comprising the areas that are today Zambia and Zimbabwe. The name "Rhodesia" was derived from the surname of Cecil John Rhodes, the British empire-builder who was the most important figure in European expansion into southern Africa. Rhodes pushed British influence into the region by obtaining mineral rights from local chiefs under questionable circumstances.

His decision to colonise Northern Rhodesia was taken after Rhodes colonised Nyasaland. He sent emissaries from Nyasaland, Alfred Sharpe, Joseph Thomson and Frank Elliott Lochner, to make treaties with chiefs in the area. After King Lewanika of the Barotse signed a treaty in 1890, in 1891 the area north of the Zambezi was formally placed under the Charter of the British South Africa Company. This area was considered by Rhodes and his colonisers to be a "tropical dependency" rather than another northward extension of the settlement of southern Africa. [1]

At first the area was administrated as two different units, North-Western Rhodesia and North-Eastern Rhodesia, but in 1911 these were merged into Northern Rhodesia.

The Company built a railway through from Livingstone to the Belgian Congo between 1904 and 1909 and some mines were set up. However, the Company considered the principal economic benefit of Northern Rhodesia to be as a reservoir for migrant labour which could be called upon for Southern Rhodesia. In addition there was some cattle farming in Barotseland. Therefore Northern Rhodesia attracted little white settlment, in contrast to its southern neigbhour.

British common law became the basis of the administration of the area, unlike Roman Dutch law which applied in Southern Rhodesia. In 1916, the British South Africa Company attempted to unify the administration of the two territories, but this foundered because of opposition from the Southern Rhodesian colonialists who were concerned about taking responsibility for a large undeveloped area and also about the Northern Rhodesian practice of employing Africans in administrative posts in lack of European settlers. The prospect of a split in opinion between the Company and the settlers led to the establishment of an Advisory Council through which settler opinion could be communicated.

Protectorate status

Following a judgment by the Privy Council that the land in Southern Rhodesia belonged to the British Crown, opinion among settlers in Southern Rhodesia turned to favour responsible government and in 1923 this request was granted. This left Northern Rhodesia in a difficult position since the British South Africa Company had believed it owned the land in both territories and some settlers suggested that the ownership in Northern Rhodesia be similarly referred. However, the British South Africa Company insisted that its claims were unchallengeable and persuaded the United Kingdom government to enter into direct negotiations over the future administration of Northern Rhodesia.

As a result, a settlement was achieved by which Northern Rhodesia became a protectorate under the United Kingdom government, with its administrative machinery taken over by the Colonial Service, while the British South Africa Company retained extensive areas of freehold property and the protectorate's mineral rights. It was also agreed that half of the proceeds of land sales in the former North-Western Rhodesia would go to the Company. On April 1, 1924, Sir Herbert Stanley was appointed as Governor and Northern Rhodesia became an official Protectorate of the United Kingdom, with capital in Livingstone. The capital was moved to Lusaka in 1935.

At the same time, a Legislative Council was estabilished, of which five members were elected by the small European minority consisting of only 4,000 people, but none by the African population.

Mining developments

Before 1924, the British South Africa Company had not sought to exploit Northern Rhodesia's mineral resources. With the Company giving up administration, it changed its mining policy. Whereas Southern Rhodesia had seen a flood of fortune-seeking prospectors seeking to set up independent mines, Northern Rhodesia was largely untouched, and this allowed the Company to agree large scale deals with major commercial mining companies.

One company, Rhodesia Concessions Ltd., was formed by Sir Edmund Davis and Alfred Chester Beatty. Beatty was largely responsible for discovering the copper resources located towards the northern border with the Belgian Congo. Copper was becoming much more valuable as more Copper was needed for electrical components and the motor industry. It only became apparent in 1925 how extensive the Copper deposits were; unlike the Copper located in the Congo, it was not difficult to extract profitably and investors were keen to provide the capital to set up Copper mines. Two partly interconnected companies came to control what was becoming known as the Copperbelt: the Rhodesian Anglo American Corporation, closely linked to the Witwatersrand gold industry and financed from Britain and South Africa, and the Rhodesia Selection Trust, financed from the United States of America. A construction boom began.

The production of copper at the time was in the hands of an American cartel which sought to restrict supply in order to increase prices. While at first this encouraged investment, consumers sought alternative and cheaper materials and with the economic downturn, the price of copper crashed in 1931. An international agreement restricted output. This caused a catastrophe in Northern Rhodesia where many employees were sacked, and put an end to hopes which many Europeans had held of turning Northern Rhodesia into another white dominion like Southern Rhodesia. Many settlers took this opportunity to move back to Southern Rhodesia, while Africans returned to their farms.

Economic recovery

Despite the economic crash, the large firms were still able to maintain a profit. The fact that unemployed workers had left meant there were no increases in taxation, and labour costs remained low. At a 1932 conference of copper producers in New York the Rhodesian companies objected to further market intervention, and when no agreement could be made, the previous restrictions on competition lapsed. This placed the Northern Rhodesians in a very powerful position.

Meanwhile the British South Africa Company sold its remaining Southern Rhodesian holdings to the Southern Rhodesian government in 1933 giving it the capital to invest in developing other mines. It negotiated an agreement between Rhodesian Railways and the copper mine companies for exclusive use, and used resources freed up to buy a major stake in the Anglo American Corporation. By the end of the 1930s, Northern Rhodesian copper mining was booming.

Settler - native relations

In contrast to Southern Rhodesia, Northern Rhodesia followed a policy of 'Indirect Rule' of African areas, where the administration attempted to build up self-governing institutions within the African community and to leave them to their own devices. In 1930, the United Kingdom's Secretary of State for Dominion Affairs Lord Passfield issued a memorandum which said that the interests of natives should be paramount in Northern Rhodesia and should, if they came into conflict, take precedence over those of the settlers. This aroused considerable opposition to the United Kingdom government among the settlers.

Africans working in the copper mines were outraged when, in 1935, the rates of the poll tax charged in the Copperbelt were increased retrospectively because of a large number of defaulters. Although the Provincial Commissioners had been told about the change on January 11, it was not until May 20 that the Native Tax Amendment Ordinance was signed, with rates implemented as of the previous January 1. This decision provoked an all out Copperbelt strike which broke out from May 22 to May 25 in three of the four mines in the area, namely Mufulira, Nkana and Roan Antelope. Troops had to be sent to Nkana to restore order. When, on May 29, police in Luanshya attempted to disperse a group of Africans, violence erupted and six Africans were shot dead. The loss of life shocked both sides and the strike was suspended while a Commission of Inquiry was set up. It found that the way the increases were announced was the key factor, and if they had been introduced calmly, they would have been accepted.

One effect of the strike was the establishment of tribal elders' advisory councils for Africans across the Copperbelt, following a system introduced at the Roan Antelope mine. These councils acted as minor courts, referring other matters to the mine compound manager or district organiser. Native courts operated outside the urban areas and eventually these were introduced to the towns. Mufulira was the first, in 1938, and by the end of 1940 they existed in Kitwe, Luanshya, Ndola and Chingola on the Copperbelt, Lusaka and Broken Hill in the centre of the country, and Livingstone on the border with Southern Rhodesia. Simultaneously, African Urban Advisory Councils were established in the main Copperbelt towns. Relations between Africans and Europeans were often strained.[2]

Constitutional developments and World War

Shortly after the Copperbelt strike there was an election to the Legislative Council, in which all candidates supported investigating amalgamation of Northern and Southern Rhodesia. After a conference at Victoria Falls between the elected members and representatives of the Southern Rhodesian political parties in January 1936 resolved in favour of amalgamation "under a constitution conferring the right of complete self-government". The UK government, after initial refusal, organised a Royal Commission on the issue under Viscount Bledisloe.

The Royal Commission reported in March 1939, and though it accepted amalgamation in principle, it rejected it for immediate implementation. The Northern Rhodesian white population regarded the report as a severe disappointment, but before they had the opportunity to make a serious response, the outbreak of World War II fundamentally changed the economic and political situation. Northern Rhodesian Copper became a vital resource in winning the war.

When the European copper miners realised their importance, they went on a wildcat strike demanding that basic pay be raised by 2s. per shift with a war bonus. Realising that they might be sacked and replaced with African workers who were paid less, they also demanded a closed shop. The strikers' demands were largely conceded with an agreement to consult the miners' union on any "dilution of labour", and to revert to pre-war conditions after the war.

The African miners got to hear of the settlement unofficially and rumours that wage increases of £4 per day circulated; despite increasing African bonus payments, the Africans in Nkana mine went on strike. When many turned up to collect their pay for work before going on strike, the diehard strikers assumed they were reporting for work and a confrontation began which quickly escalated into a riot in which troops opened fire. Thirteen were killed. Another Commission of Inquiry found that conditions at Nkana and Mufulira had little changed from 1935, although at Nchanga and Roan Antelope no strike had happened. [3]

There was an election in 1941. Roy Welensky, a railway trade union leader who had been elected in 1938, set up the Northern Rhodesian Labour Party as a party favouring amalgamation. All its five candidates were elected. This development was spotted in London where Labour Party MPs were concerned that the demand, if granted, would diminish the position of the Africans of Northern Rhodesia.

Later in the war, the British government's Ministry of Supply entered into agreements with the Northern Rhodesian and Canadian copper mines to supply all the copper needed by the armed forces for set prices. This removed free competition and therefore kept prices down; as British companies, the main copper producers were also subject to the Excess Profits Tax. However they did have a guaranteed market, and in 1943 the Ministry of Supply paid half of the cost of an expansion programme planned for the Nchanga mine.

Post-war

The end of the war gave the opportunity for increased participation by Africans in the affairs of the colony. In 1946, the Federation of African Welfare Societies was formed. Welfare societies had been set up by educated Africans in towns in the 1930s who discussed local affairs in English. In 1948 the Federation changed its name to the Northern Rhodesia Congress and Godwin Lewanika, a Barotseland native from an aristocratic background, became its leader.

The war years had seen the establishment of African Regional Councils formed from delegates of the African Urban Advisory Councils, and the regional councils together met as the African Representative Council. From 1948, the African Representative Council was allowed to elect two Africans to the Legislative Council which governed the colony. The next year, African mineworkers formed a trade union.

The Congress under Godwin Lewanika became a political force and developed a radical policy. In 1952 Lewanika was succeeded by Harry Nkumbula, a schoolteacher from Kitwe who was such a radical figure that many Chiefs withdrew their support from the Congress. These developments among the Africans caused concern among the 50,000 white Northern Rhodesians who feared being deposed. The white Northern Rhodesians also felt that the Africans, who were led by clerks and schoolteachers, lacked any skills in the complex business of governing.

However, the Africans did have some interests in common with the Europeans, including on the issue of trade union organisation. Roy Welensky also led a move in the Legislative Council to restrict the British South Africa Company's mineral rights which garnered African support; the Company agreed in 1949 to assign 20% of its revenues to the Government, and to transfer all its remaining rights in 1986.

Federation

See also: Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland

As part of their attempts to hold off African control, the idea of federation with Southern Rhodesia and Nyasaland was again suggested. The United Kingdom government, although now run by the Labour Party, was becoming favourable as a way of more logically running the remaining British Empire and of relieving the burden of running loss-making colonies like Nyasaland.

Accordingly in 1949 a conference was held at Victoria Falls which produced a workable federal scheme. After revisions and a further draft by civil servants in 1951, agreement was eventually reached and following a successful referendum in Southern Rhodesia, Northern Rhodesia joined the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland when it was formally created on October 23, 1953.

Progress towards federation was greeted with outright hostility by the African population, who knew that it was proposed in order to perpetuate European control. The members of the African Representative Council pointedly referred to the continuous refusal of the Legislative Council to extend the representation of Africans. The Northern Rhodesian government attempted to persuade the members of the Council by bringing on board the Provincial Councils, who were less opposed than the main Council to federation. This strategy saw some success in the Provincial Councils but it failed to change the views in the Council.

Protectorate government during Federation

Northern Rhodesia found itself in a difficult position during the Federation, as it had to cede to Southern Rhodesian opinions. While the three territory governments had agreed before Federation to prioritise a hydro-electric scheme on the Kafue River in Northern Rhodesia for the Copperbelt over the much bigger Kariba Dam scheme, the Federation government took the opposite decision: the Kariba Dam was now affordable and delivered more power. Many Northern Rhodesians resented the way their economic needs now had to come second.

The Northern Rhodesian African National Congress became much more popular as a result of federation, organising a series of strikes on the Copperbelt and boycotts in other urban areas against discrimination in services. The biggest of these was in April 1956 when the Congress called on Africans in Lusaka to boycott some European-owned shops which depended on trade with African customers; the boycott was observed and the shopkeepers were nearly bankrupted.

The European population believed the protectorate government should crack down on the Congress, and when Mufulira was also ordered to boycott shops the leading members of the Congress were arrested on a conspiracy charge. At trial it was shown that the Congress had sought meetings with the Mufulira Chamber of Commerce for two and a half years without success, and substantiated many African claims of discrimination against them; the magistrate dismissed the charges. In the late 1950s, the incidence of discrimination against Africans notably reduced.

Developments in African politics

Continuing their opposition to the Federation, the Northern Rhodesia African National Congress picked up on a demand by their counterparts in Nyasaland that the protectorate be allowed to secede. The growing political activity of the Congress led to an increased presence for Africans in the Federal legislature at the 1958 election, and then to a concomitant change to the territorial franchise and an increase in the number of seats for Africans on the Legislative Council, a development guided by Sir Arthur Benson (Governor of Northern Rhodesia) who began writing a new constitution for the protectorate.

Benson's draft constitution, published in September 1958, aimed at making a gentle transition to non-racial politics. It led on to a crisis among Africans. In October 1958 the African National Congress split when Kenneth Kaunda (Secretary-General) broke away with other younger members to form the Zambia African National Congress which had a policy of immediate self-government based on universal adult suffrage, and started a more vigorous campaign. This development had parallels in Southern Rhodesia where illegal campaign meetings led to a State of Emergency being declared on February 26, 1959 and in Nyasaland where riots led to a State of Emergency on March 2, 1959.

On March 11, in the middle of the general election campaign, the Governor of Northern Rhodesia proscribed the Zambia African National Congress and served restriction notices on its leaders; he was careful to say that the Northern Rhodesia African National Congress was not covered. An inquiry into this apparent intervention in an election was ordered to be held by N.C.A. Ridley, who found the Governor's actions justified. [4]

Beginning of the end of Federation

The United Kingdom government announced in July 1959 the appointment of an advisory commission to review the constitution of the Federation; Harold Macmillan declared that his government supported an increase in the constitutional responsibilities of the territorial governments as opposed to the Federation. The Earl of Home, Secretary of State for Commonwealth Relations, stated more explicitly that power would be transferred to the Northern Rhodesia and Nyasaland governments at the same time as they would "progressively become more and more representative of Africans until they have African majorities". This statement was described by the chairman of the Northern Rhodesian branch of the United Federal Party as "a blast at the very foundations on which the present Northern Rhodesian Constitution has been built".

It was not until December 5, 1960 that the Federal Review opened in London. After long negotiation, Kenneth Kaunda agreed to attend on condition that a constitutional conference over Northern Rhodesia aimed at introducing an African majority government was not delayed. The African nationalists from Northern Rhodesia, acting in conjunction with their colleagues from Southern Rhodesia and Nyasaland, forced the UK government to agree that the territorial constitutional conferences would take precedence over the Federal Review. Federal Prime Minister Roy Welensky failed to get a pledge from the UK government that Northern Rhodesia would not be given majority rule at that time.

The United Federal Party delegation to the Northern Rhodesia constitutional conference announced on January 28, 1961 that they were boycotting the talks, and the African delegation refused to accept Iain Macleod's general proposals. However, Macleod persisted and announced his plan to Parliament. Discussions continued in Northern Rhodesia and on June 15, the leader of the UFP in Northern Rhodesia, John Roberts, gave an interview to the Northern News in which he observed that the Legislative Council would probably have a white majority under the plan. With some tweaking of the details, these proposals formed the basis for the 1962 constitution. African dislike of the way the constitutional talks developed fed into disturbances across Northern Rhodesia over the summer of 1961.

End of Federation and independence

When the Federation dissolved at the end of 1963, Northern Rhodesia reverted to its former status until achieving independence as the nation of Zambia on October 24, 1964.

Government and politics

Under British South Africa Company rule, there was no obligation for the company to set up any form of body to consult with residents. However when a serious split in opinion between the settlers and the Company opened in 1918, the Company set up an Advisory Council through which settler opinion could be represented to it. This council had no legislative or executive powers. It had five nominated members: four represented North-Western Rhodesia and one represented North-Eastern Rhodesia. The members represented the resident Europeans in their constituencies.

Legislative council

When Northern Rhodesia became a Protectorate under the British Empire on April 1, 1924, a Legislative Council was established on which the Governor of Northern Rhodesia sat ex officio as Presiding Officer. The initial council consisted entirely of nominated members, as no procedure existed at the time for holding elections. However, the members were divided between the "official members" who held executive posts in the administration of the Protectorate, and the "unofficial members" who held no posts.

Electoral system

In 1926, a system of election was worked out and the first election was held for five elected unofficial members, who took their seats together with nine nominated official members. An elector in Northern Rhodesia had to be a United Kingdom citizen, a requirement which practically ruled out Africans who were British Protected Persons. In addition, would-be electors were required to fill out an application form in English, and to have an annual income of at least £200 or occupy immovable property worth £250 (tribal or community occupation of such property was specifically excluded). [5]

In 1929, the number of unofficial members was increased to seven. 1938 saw the first acknowledgment of the need to represent the opinions of Africans, as a space for one nominated unofficial member was made. This member replaced one of the nominated officials, so that the official and unofficial members each numbered eight. In 1941 one additional member was added to both the nominated officials and the elected unofficials, for a total of ten unofficials (nine elected) and nine nominated officials.

Post-war

In 1945, there was an increase in the number of unofficial members representing Africans from one to three, and an additional two nominated unofficials were introduced for a total of five. 1948 saw the replacement of the Governor by a Speaker, who also sat ex officio, and the introduction of two members nominated on the advice of the African Representative Council.

An Order-in-Council coming into effect on December 31, 1953 provided for a new Legislative Council to consist of a Speaker ex officio, eight nominated officials, twelve elected unofficials, four African unofficial members nominated by the Governor on the advice the African Representative Council, and two nominated unofficial members representing the interests of Africans. The nominated officials were identified as the Chief Secretary, Attorney General, Financial Secretary, and Secretary for Native Affairs, and four others.

1959 Order in Council

1959 saw a vast increase in the elected proportion. The Legislative Council then consisted of the Speaker and 30 members. All but eight of these members were to be elected: the eight nominated were the same four named posts as before, two others, and two nominated unofficial members (who were not specifically responsible for African interests). These two members were retained in order to provide that there were some members who could be called upon for Ministerial duties if there were too few elected members willing to do so.

The 22 elected members were organised in such a way as to ensure that there were eight African and 14 Europeans. The electoral roll was divided into 'General' and 'Special' with Special voters having much lower financial requirements than General voters, so that the majority of Special voters were Africans (the nationality requirement had been varied so that British Protected Persons were eligible to vote). In the towns in which a majority of Europeans lived, there were twelve constituencies; special voters could have no more than one third of the influence on the total.

In the rural areas where most Africans lived, six special constituencies were drawn. Both general and special voters participated in the elections and their votes counted for equal weight, although the majority of voters were Africans. In the special constituency areas, there were two composite 'Reserved European seats', in which special voters were restricted to one third of the influence. There were also two 'Reserved African seats' in the areas of the ordinary constituencies, although all votes counted in full. [6]

1962 constitution

Lengthy negotiations from December 1960 aimed at providing a new constitution for Northern Rhodesia, which included finding an electoral system which would provide a chance for Africans to form the government while preserving the influence of Europeans. The final form announced on March 1, 1962 preserved the two electoral rolls. As before the upper roll and the lower rolls were defined in terms of the income and property held by the voter; however, the race of the voter also came into account. The constitution then created three different classes of elected constituency:

  • Fifteen single-member constituencies elected by upper roll voters.
  • Fifteen single-member constituencies elected by lower roll voters.
  • Seven two-member National constituencies elected by both rolls together, plus one single-member Special National constituency elected by Asian and coloured voters only. Of the two-member constituencies, four were required to return one African and one European member.

The system was set up to encourage candidates in National constituencies to get the approval of both African and European voters. In order to be elected, a candidate had to obtain at least one-eighth of the total vote, or 400 votes (whichever was the fewer) of the votes cast by African and European voters. If no candidate qualified, then there was to be a rerun election; but if this election failed to produce any winner, then the seat was left empty.

1964 constitution

As part of the preparations for the independence of Northern Rhodesia, a new constitution was drawn up in 1963 which provided for a single voters roll based on universal adult suffrage. Voters still registered by race, and the colony was separately divided into 65 constituencies elected by the main roll and ten constituencies elected by the 'reserved roll' comprising European voters. Asian and mixed-race voters could choose which roll to join.

This constitution also made provision for the independence by including a Bill of Rights, and creating a Constitutional Council. Any Bill could be referred to the Constitutional Council by seven members of the Assembly, and the Council would then check whether its provisions were in accordance with the Bill of Rights. If the Council found that it was not, then legislative assent was delayed by six months.

Law

In 1889, the British South African Company was given the power to establish a police force and administer justice within Northern Rhodesia. In the case of African natives appearing before courts, the Company was instructed to have regard to the customs and laws of their tribe or nation. An Order in Council of 1900 created the High Court of North-Eastern Rhodesia which took control of civil and criminal justice; it was not until 1906 that North-Western Rhodesia received the same. In 1911 the two were amalgamated into the High Court of Northern Rhodesia.

Protectorate

With Protectorate status in 1924, the High Court of Northern Rhodesia was made subordinate to and in conformity with the laws of England and Wales. All United Kingdom statutes in force on August 17, 1911 were given application to Northern Rhodesia, together with those of later years if specifically applied to the Protectorate. Where Africans were parties before courts, Native law and customs were applied, except if they were "repugnant to natural justice or morality", or inconsistent with any other law in force.

Subsidiary Courts

Below the High Court were Magistrates' Courts which fell into four classes:

  1. Courts of Provincial Commissioners, Senior Resident Magistrates and Resident Magistrates. In criminal matters, such courts could impose sentences of imprisonment for up to three years; in civil matters, they were limited to awards of £200 and for recovery of land worth up to £144 annual rent.
  2. Courts of District Commissioners. In criminal matters, they could impose sentences of imprisonment for up to one year without confirmation by the High Court; they could also impose up to three years' imprisonment with the High Court's consent. Their civil jurisdiction was limited to £100.
  3. Courts of District Officers.
  4. Courts of Cadets attached to the Provincial Administration.

Criminal trials for treason, murder and manslaughter, or attempts and conspiracies to commit them, were reserved for the High Court. Civil matters relating to constitutional issues, wills and marriages were also restricted to the High Court.

Native Courts

The Native Courts Ordinance 1937 allowed the Governor to issue a warrant recognising native courts. Their jurisdiction only covered natives, but extended to criminal and civil jurisdiction. Native courts were not allowed to impose the death penalty, nor try witchcraft without permission. There was also provision for a Native Court of Appeal, but if not established, appeal was to the Provincial Commissioner and thence to the High Court.

Demographics

Year Population
Natives Europeans Coloured Asiatic
1911 826,000 1,497
1923 1,000,000 3,750
1925 1,140,642 4,624
1931 1,372,235 13,846
1932 1,382,705 10,553
1933 1,371,213 11,278
1935 1,366,425 10,000
1940 1,366,641 15,188
1943 - 18,745
1945 1,631,146 21,371
1946 1,634,980 21,919
1951 1,700,577 37,221 1,092 2,529
1954 2,040,000 60,000 1,400 4,600
1956 2,110,000 64,800 1,550 5,400
1959 2,280,000 73,000 9,600
1960 2,340,000 76,000 2,000 8,000
1961 2,430,000 75,000 1,900 7,900
1963 3,460,000 74,000 2,300 8,900

Source: Whitaker's Almanack, Handbook to the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland (Federal Information Department, 1960)

Economy

Mining

Mining in Northern Rhodesia begun in 1899 when George Grey established the Kansanshi mine, out of which copper was mined. The extensive copper deposits in Northern Rhodesia were not however discovered until the late 1920s, and an extensive development of what then became known as the Copperbelt happened in 1928-1930. Copper mining became the cornerstone of the Northern Rhodesian economy, and the overall economic health of the protectorate came to ride with the state of the world copper industry.

In addition to mining copper, the mines of Northern Rhodesia produced Gold, Silver, Lead, Cobalt, Zinc, Manganese, Cadmium, Selenium and Uranium. However, the numbers employed were relatively small (7,350 Europeans and 39,426 Africans in 1958).

Agriculture

In contrast to Southern Rhodesia, agriculture was a relatively small part of the economy of Northern Rhodesia. This situation was partly explained by the less favourable climate and soil, and also the fact that European settlers were less likely to get the freehold of farmland: the majority of European farms were leasehold.

European agriculture was principally livestock; in 1958 there were over a million cattle in Northern Rhodesia, of which 167,000 were on European-owned farms. Many were beef cattle but dairy production was also found around Mazabuka, Lusaka and Broken Hill. 80% of milk production was handled by the Co-operative Creameries of Northern Rhodesia Ltd, which was financed by the government.

The largest crop grown was Maize, which was concentrated between the Monze and Kafue Rivers and around Chisamba. It was generally grown in rotation with a green legume or manure crop. The second largest crop was Tobacco, of which there were some farms in the Eastern province and along the railway line between Zimba and Pemba.

African agriculture was organised on a subsistence basis by the majority of the African population. African land tenure was complex, with the tribe holding the majority of the land in common, but permitting individual cultivation of certain areas. The majority of African farms were arable only, with cattle farms found extensively only in the Kafue basin, in Barotseland, and in the plateau in the Eastern province; the extensive presence of the Tsetse fly made cattle difficult to raise.

Industry

Manufacturing industry was a small but increasing part of the Northern Rhodesian economy: in 1955 there were about 200 manufacturing firms based in the protectorate (this figure did not include the Copper and other mines). Most had been set up after the Second World War; in 1951, the Northern Rhodesian government established the Northern Rhodesia Industrial Loans Board. The Board was instructed to assist the development of industry with capital loans for new plant, and with working capital; it did not cover the farming industry.

Administrative subdivisions

Culture

References

  1. Gann, L.H. (1960). “History of Rhodesia and Nyasaland 1889-1953”, Handbook to the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland. Federal Information Department, pp. 62, 74. 
  2. Jenkins, E.E. (1937). Report of an Inquiry into the Causes of a Disturbance at Nkana on the 4th and 5th November 1937. Lusaka: Government Printer. 
  3. Report of the Commission Appointed to Inquire into the Disturbances in the Copperbelt, Northern Rhodesia, July 1940. Lusaka: Government Printer. 
  4. Report of an Inquiry Into All the Circumstances Which Gave Rise to the Making of the Safeguarding of Elections and Public Safety Regulations, 1959 (Government Printer, Lusaka, 1959).
  5. Davison, J.W. (1948). The Northern Rhodesian Legislative Council, 23-24. 
  6. Clegg, Edward (1960). Race and Politics:Partnership in the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 269-270. 

See also

External links