Talk:Partisan realignment: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Shamira Gelbman (new page) |
imported>Shamira Gelbman |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
== Probably doesn't need disambiguation due to the second word in the title... == | |||
But "partisan" is ambiguous. Outside the political realm, it is a common term, especially in Europe, for guerilla. It's also a medieval weapon; a partisan is to a halberd is as a double-bitted (i.e., bladed) axe is to a single-bladed axe. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 17:43, 27 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
:I guess on its own "realignment" is also ambiguous. If disambiguation pages are developed for "partisan" and/or "realignment," it might pay to include "partisan realignment" on them, but this article on its own shouldn't necessitate them. [[User:Shamira Gelbman|Shamira Gelbman]] 20:14, 27 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:14, 27 June 2009
Probably doesn't need disambiguation due to the second word in the title...
But "partisan" is ambiguous. Outside the political realm, it is a common term, especially in Europe, for guerilla. It's also a medieval weapon; a partisan is to a halberd is as a double-bitted (i.e., bladed) axe is to a single-bladed axe. Howard C. Berkowitz 17:43, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
- I guess on its own "realignment" is also ambiguous. If disambiguation pages are developed for "partisan" and/or "realignment," it might pay to include "partisan realignment" on them, but this article on its own shouldn't necessitate them. Shamira Gelbman 20:14, 27 June 2009 (UTC)