Willard Van Orman Quine: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger (New page: {{subpages}} '''Willard Van Orman Quine''' was one the leading philosophers of the 20th century.) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
'''Willard Van Orman Quine''' was one the leading philosophers of the | '''Willard Van Orman Quine''' was one the leading [[philosophy|philosophers]] and [[logic|logicians]] of the [[twentieth century philosophy|twentieth century]], and perhaps the most prominent [[American philosophy|American philosopher]] of that century. A longtime professor at [[Harvard University]], Quine is famous for defending a broad cluster of interrelated, "hard-headed" theses. There is no principled way to draw the distinction between [[analytic proposition|analytic]] and [[synthetic proposition]]s, he argued, and there is no principled way to fix on a single translation of a proposition in one language into another language. Quine had a long correspondence with [[Rudolf Carnap]] and shared in the [[scientism]] of the [[Vienna Circle]], saying, for example, that the best method to fix on an [[ontology]] is to accept the existence of whatever entities are necessary in the refined language of science. | ||
[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] | |||
Latest revision as of 07:00, 8 November 2024
Willard Van Orman Quine was one the leading philosophers and logicians of the twentieth century, and perhaps the most prominent American philosopher of that century. A longtime professor at Harvard University, Quine is famous for defending a broad cluster of interrelated, "hard-headed" theses. There is no principled way to draw the distinction between analytic and synthetic propositions, he argued, and there is no principled way to fix on a single translation of a proposition in one language into another language. Quine had a long correspondence with Rudolf Carnap and shared in the scientism of the Vienna Circle, saying, for example, that the best method to fix on an ontology is to accept the existence of whatever entities are necessary in the refined language of science.