Online encyclopedia/Bibliography: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen (started) |
imported>Daniel Mietchen m (+one) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| author = Editorial | | author = Editorial | ||
| year = 2008 | | year = 2008 | ||
| title = | | title = Wouldn't you like to know? | ||
| journal = Nature Physics | | journal = Nature Physics | ||
| volume = 4 | | volume = 4 | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| doi = 10.1038/nphys1012 | | doi = 10.1038/nphys1012 | ||
}} | }} | ||
*{{CZ:Ref:Giles 2005 Internet encyclopaedias go head to head}} |
Latest revision as of 19:01, 25 June 2009
- Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner. For formatting, consider using automated reference wikification.
- Editorial (2008). "Wouldn't you like to know?". Nature Physics 4 (7): 505. DOI:10.1038/nphys1012. Research Blogging.
- Giles, J. (2005), "Internet encyclopaedias go head to head", Nature 438: 900–901, DOI:10.1038/438900a [e]
- A widely cited and debated study which compared the accuracy of 42 entries each in the English Wikipedia and the Encyclopaedia Britannica, concluding that both had similar numbers of factual errors.