Computer networking application protocols: Difference between revisions
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz m (made class of protocols plural) |
mNo edit summary |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{PropDel}}<br><br>{{subpages}} | ||
'''Computer networking application protocols''' travel over | '''Computer networking application protocols''' travel over computer networking end-to-end protocols to provide services meaningful to application programs residing in the endpoints. The application protocols differ in the kind of information they transfer (e.g., self-contained messages, file transfer|computer files, remote procedure calls, spoken language, etc.). Note well that these are not directly accessible to a human user. To draw an analogy to postal mail, a person can drop an envelope into a mailbox, but has no access either to the mechanism between mailbox and post office, or post office to post office. | ||
Application protocols also differ in their expectations of the performance end-to-end service below them. The application protocol may provide security, expect certain security services from the end-to-end or | Application protocols also differ in their expectations of the performance end-to-end service below them. The application protocol may provide security, expect certain security services from the end-to-end or computer networking internetwork protocols over which they run, or both. | ||
==Classes of information transfer== | ==Classes of information transfer== | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Messages are self-contained units of data, which may contain other types of data. | Messages are self-contained units of data, which may contain other types of data. | ||
Message handling protocols are analogous to postal protocols. Different protocols run among mail clients that provide a human interface; message transfer agents analogous to post offices, possibly at multiple levels of a hierarchy; | Message handling protocols are analogous to postal protocols. Different protocols run among mail clients that provide a human interface; message transfer agents analogous to post offices, possibly at multiple levels of a hierarchy; and message stores, analogous to temporary mailboxes. | ||
The major IETF message transfer paradigms and protocols include: | The major IETF message transfer paradigms and protocols include: | ||
*Mail client to mail server: ''' | *Mail client to mail server: '''Post Office Protocol version 3 (POP3)''', in which the messages are transferred to the client, and '''Internet Mail Access Protocol (IMAP)''', in which copies of the messages go to the client but the master copies remain on the server, They use a client-server model | ||
*Mail transfer agent to mail transfer agent: ''' | *Mail transfer agent to mail transfer agent: '''Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP)''' exchanges messages, on a peer-to-peer model, among mail transfer agents that either are part of mail servers, or pure mail exchangers. | ||
See messaging application protocols for further detail | |||
===File=== | ===File=== | ||
Files are sequences of units of data. | Files are sequences of units of data. | ||
Line 28: | Line 31: | ||
*Sequencing of packets | *Sequencing of packets | ||
===Security=== | ===Security=== | ||
*Endpoint | *Endpoint authentication | ||
**Client authentication | **Client authentication | ||
**Server authentication | **Server authentication | ||
**Peer authentication | **Peer authentication | ||
*Data integrity | *Data integrity | ||
** | **Atomic integrity | ||
** | **Sequential integrity | ||
* | *Content confidentiality | ||
*Traffic flow confidentiality | *Traffic flow confidentiality | ||
*[[ | *Nonrepudiation[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] |
Latest revision as of 16:00, 31 July 2024
This article may be deleted soon. | ||
---|---|---|
Computer networking application protocols travel over computer networking end-to-end protocols to provide services meaningful to application programs residing in the endpoints. The application protocols differ in the kind of information they transfer (e.g., self-contained messages, file transfer|computer files, remote procedure calls, spoken language, etc.). Note well that these are not directly accessible to a human user. To draw an analogy to postal mail, a person can drop an envelope into a mailbox, but has no access either to the mechanism between mailbox and post office, or post office to post office. Application protocols also differ in their expectations of the performance end-to-end service below them. The application protocol may provide security, expect certain security services from the end-to-end or computer networking internetwork protocols over which they run, or both. Classes of information transferMessageMessages are self-contained units of data, which may contain other types of data. Message handling protocols are analogous to postal protocols. Different protocols run among mail clients that provide a human interface; message transfer agents analogous to post offices, possibly at multiple levels of a hierarchy; and message stores, analogous to temporary mailboxes. The major IETF message transfer paradigms and protocols include:
See messaging application protocols for further detail FileFiles are sequences of units of data. Structured dataRemote procedure callsCharacter- or bit-oriented interactionDirectory servicesNetwork management servicesExpectations of the end-to-end servicePerformanceThey may be tolerant or intolerant of impairments such as:
Security
|