Talk:Crusades

Map and article name

In case anyone is interested on a map about the early Crusades, here is one [1]. The work is on the Public Domain, because it's a work from the U.S Federal Government [2]. Also, shouldn't this article be Crusades instead of The Crusades?--José Leonardo Andrade 09:22, 19 October 2007 (CDT)

No repply so far. In any case, I will redirect Crusades to this page. Maybe an editor from the History Workgroup can voice his opinion on this issue one day.--José Leonardo Andrade 09:43, 16 November 2007 (CST)

agreed on name = Crusades and I will change it Richard Jensen 15:46, 11 March 2008 (CDT)

Alas, that move was (incorrectly) done via a cut-and-paste, not using the "move page" function. I've looked at the history (here), and IMO the history at the prior location is in fact significant. Can a constable please repair this? There's an instruction page here, and it's not too difficult. I'd do it myself (I used to be the 'fixing cut and paste moves' guru on Wikipedia), but alas I don't have sysop. J. Noel Chiappa 20:51, 11 March 2008 (CDT)

significant??? Denis and I did 100% of the writing. no secret about that. Richard Jensen 21:40, 11 March 2008 (CDT)

By "significant" I merely meant 'added significant content'. J. Noel Chiappa 21:44, 11 March 2008 (CDT)

well yes but I don't see any problem. The full record is all online at this article and the older article. I used cut and past because you don't want to use "move" to replace an existing article.Richard Jensen 21:49, 11 March 2008 (CDT)

I think move will work fine, it will set up the redirects and everything. --Todd Coles 21:52, 11 March 2008 (CDT)

No problem, got it fixed by merging histories as JNG suggested. I needed to practice that move anyway! Thanks for the opportunity. --D. Matt Innis 21:56, 11 March 2008 (CDT)