CZ:Proposals/Executive/Finished: Difference between revisions
< CZ:Proposals | Executive
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger (New page: '''These are CZ:Executive Committee proposals that are "finished": they were approved and action on them has, at least, started.''' == Adopt the proposals system == {{proposal |Brief...) |
imported>Jitse Niesen (move "Simplifying and improving CZ guidance pages" here) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''These are [[CZ:Executive Committee|Executive Committee]] proposals that are "finished": they were approved and action on them has, at least, started.''' | '''These are [[CZ:Executive Committee|Executive Committee]] proposals that are "finished": they were approved and action on them has, at least, started.''' | ||
== Simplifying and improving CZ guidance pages == | |||
{{proposal | |||
|Brief descriptive title = Approval system for CZ: pages | |||
|Summary of proposal = Briefly, we have a logjam. The guidance pages are important and often sensitive, but need simplifying and improving. This intimidates editors (fear of introducing an error). I propose that we have an Approved version of all CZ pages, and a Draft version that is clearly open to all suggestions and contributions. The Approval process should be as that for other articles, except that the relevantly qualified "editors" are the Executive Committee. |Name and date of original proposer = [[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 07:08, 14 February 2008 (CST) | |||
|Username of driver = [[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 04:02, 15 February 2008 (CST) | |||
|Next step = Finished | |||
|Target date for next step = Finished | |||
|Notes = | |||
}} | |||
== Adopt the proposals system == | == Adopt the proposals system == | ||
| Line 11: | Line 21: | ||
|Notes = And yes...I am using the system to confirm the system...circularity alert! But stand back, I'm an Expert about this. (I wrote my dissertation about an analogous kind of circularity.) | |Notes = And yes...I am using the system to confirm the system...circularity alert! But stand back, I'm an Expert about this. (I wrote my dissertation about an analogous kind of circularity.) | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Proposals navigation}} | |||
Latest revision as of 07:32, 29 April 2008
These are Executive Committee proposals that are "finished": they were approved and action on them has, at least, started.
Simplifying and improving CZ guidance pages
Summary: Briefly, we have a logjam. The guidance pages are important and often sensitive, but need simplifying and improving. This intimidates editors (fear of introducing an error). I propose that we have an Approved version of all CZ pages, and a Draft version that is clearly open to all suggestions and contributions. The Approval process should be as that for other articles, except that the relevantly qualified "editors" are the Executive Committee.
| ||||
| Complete proposal | ||||
Adopt the proposals system
Summary: The Citizendium should adopt the proposals system as current set out on CZ:Proposals and its subpages. We Citizens can and should participate in our own governance. We Citizens often offer ideas for improvements (proposals) and make calls for a decision to be made between definite options (issues). Notice that we do distinguish between proposals and issues, but, below, we'll sometimes use "proposal" to mean "either a proposal or an issue." The proposals system is a single place where Citizens may make proposals and raise issues. If you submit a proposal here, and it gains a champion (a "driver"), you can be sure that the community will respond; your ideas or your question will not simply fall through the cracks. (Read further on CZ:Proposals.)
| ||||||
| Complete proposal | ||||||
| Proposals System Navigation (advanced users only) | |
|
Proposal lists (some planned pages are still blank):
|