Talk:Air Resources Laboratory: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Milton Beychok
m (Created a Talk page and added a comment)
 
imported>Milton Beychok
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:


I have uploaded here as is and will now start cleaning it up to be suitable for CZ. - [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 16:49, 2 February 2008 (CST)
I have uploaded here as is and will now start cleaning it up to be suitable for CZ. - [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 16:49, 2 February 2008 (CST)
:Thanks, Milton.  Is this nearly as far as the article can and should be taken?  Is it really close to approval?  If not, it should be marked status=2, not status=1. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 19:02, 2 February 2008 (CST)
::Larry, first let me say that Stephen Ewen explained to me the intent of the Topic Informant Workgroup in a manner that I understood. I will comply with policy from now on.
::As for this article, in my opinion, this article is about as far as I can take it and as far as it deserves to be taken. Regards, [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 12:10, 3 February 2008 (CST)
== Re consideration of approval [[Air Resources Laboratory]] ==
Milton, this article appears ready to begin the approval process.
My only reaction after reading it was that I could get a better feel for ARL's operation if you added a few examples of specific activities, perhaps drawing from their activity reports.
In other words, what good things has ARL done for us lately?  [[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 16:51, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
:Hi, Tony: I would be happy to select certain of their recent activities, mention them briefly and provide references links to the source activity reports. However, I would like to wait until the [[Boiling point/Draft]] has been re-approved. It has been waiting now for 2 months ... which is more than enough time in which to decide whether or not to re-approve it. Especially now that we have two Approval Managers.
:Once we finish with [[Boiling point/Draft]], then I will proceed  with this article as you have suggested. Thanks much. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 17:26, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:26, 24 February 2012

This article is developed but not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Gallery [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  A group within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration that develops climate models, air quality models and models for dispersion, transformation and removal of atmospheric pollutants. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Engineering, Earth Sciences and Topic Informant [Editors asked to check categories]
 Subgroup category:  Chemical Engineering
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  American English
Fountain pen.png
 NOTICE, please do not remove from top of page.
I released this article to Wikipedia. In particular, the identical text that appears there is of my sole authorship. Therefore, no credit for Wikipedia content on the Citizendium applies.
Check the history of edits to see who inserted this notice.

My Wikipedian involvement in this article

I was not the original Wikipedian author of this article, but I revised and reformatted it heavily and expanded it by about 80 to 90 percent.

I have uploaded here as is and will now start cleaning it up to be suitable for CZ. - Milton Beychok 16:49, 2 February 2008 (CST)

Thanks, Milton. Is this nearly as far as the article can and should be taken? Is it really close to approval? If not, it should be marked status=2, not status=1. --Larry Sanger 19:02, 2 February 2008 (CST)
Larry, first let me say that Stephen Ewen explained to me the intent of the Topic Informant Workgroup in a manner that I understood. I will comply with policy from now on.
As for this article, in my opinion, this article is about as far as I can take it and as far as it deserves to be taken. Regards, Milton Beychok 12:10, 3 February 2008 (CST)

Re consideration of approval Air Resources Laboratory

Milton, this article appears ready to begin the approval process.

My only reaction after reading it was that I could get a better feel for ARL's operation if you added a few examples of specific activities, perhaps drawing from their activity reports.

In other words, what good things has ARL done for us lately? Anthony.Sebastian 16:51, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Tony: I would be happy to select certain of their recent activities, mention them briefly and provide references links to the source activity reports. However, I would like to wait until the Boiling point/Draft has been re-approved. It has been waiting now for 2 months ... which is more than enough time in which to decide whether or not to re-approve it. Especially now that we have two Approval Managers.
Once we finish with Boiling point/Draft, then I will proceed with this article as you have suggested. Thanks much. Milton Beychok 17:26, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Air_Resources_Laboratory&oldid=400932"