User:Milton Beychok/Sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Milton Beychok
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:Cooling Tower.png|right|thumb|249px|{{#ifexist:Template:Cooling Tower.png/credit|{{Cooling Tower.png/credit}}<br/>|}}Fan-induced draft counterflow cooling tower]]
{{AccountNotLive}}
__NOTOC__
[[File:Crude oil-fired power plant.jpg|thumb|right|225px|Industrial air pollution source]]
Atmospheric dispersion modeling is the mathematical simulation of how air pollutants disperse in the ambient atmosphere. It is performed with computer programs that solve the mathematical equations and algorithms which simulate the pollutant dispersion. The dispersion models are used to estimate or to predict the downwind concentration of air pollutants emitted from sources such as industrial plants, vehicular traffic or accidental chemical releases.


[[Image:Crossflow Cooling Tower.png|right|thumb|194px|{{#ifexist:Template:Crossflow Cooling Tower.png/credit|{{Crossflow Cooling Tower.png/credit}}<br/>|}}Fan-induced draft crossflow cooling tower]]
Such models are important to governmental agencies tasked with protecting and managing the ambient air quality. The models are typically employed to determine whether existing or proposed new industrial facilities are or will be in compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) in the United States or similar regulations in other nations. The models also serve to assist in the design of effective control strategies to reduce emissions of harmful air pollutants. During the late 1960's, the Air Pollution Control Office of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) initiated research projects to develop models for use by urban and transportation planners.<ref>J.C. Fensterstock et al, "Reduction of air pollution potential through environmental planning", ''JAPCA'', Vol. 21, No. 7, 1971.</ref>


[[Image:Power Plant Hyperboloid Cooling Towers.jpg|right|thumb|200px|{{#ifexist:Template:Power Plant Hyperboloid Cooling Towers.jpg/credit|{{Power Plant Hyperboloid Cooling Towers.jpg/credit}}<br/>|}}Power plant hyperboloid cooling towers (note water vapor plumes)]]
Air dispersion models are also used by emergency management personnel to develop emergency plans for accidental chemical releases. The results of dispersion modeling, using worst case accidental releases and meteorological conditions, can provide estimated locations of impacted areas and be used to determine appropriate protective actions. At industrial facilities in the United States, this type of consequence assessment or emergency planning is required under the Clean Air Act (CAA) codified in Part 68 of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations.


[[Image:TVA Cooling Towers.jpg|right|thumb|200px|{{#ifexist:Template:TVA Cooling Towers.jpg/credit|{{TVA Cooling Towers.jpg/credit}}<br/>|}}Power plant counterflow cooling tower (note water vapor plumes)]]
The dispersion models vary depending on the mathematics used to develop the model, but all require the input of data that may include:


[[Image:Crossflow Cooling Tower.jpg|right|thumb|200px|{{#ifexist:Template:Crossflow Cooling Tower.jpg/credit|{{Crossflow Cooling Tower.jpg/credit}}<br/>|}}Process plant crossflow cooling tower]]
* Meteorological conditions such as wind speed and direction, the amount of atmospheric turbulence (as characterized by what is called the "stability class"), the ambient air temperature, the height to the bottom of any inversion aloft that may be present, cloud cover and solar radiation.
* The emission parameters such the type of source (i.e., point, line or area), the mass flow rate, the source location and height, the source exit velocity, and the source exit temperature.
* Terrain elevations at the source location and at receptor locations, such as nearby homes, schools, businesses and hospitals.
* The location, height and width of any obstructions (such as buildings or other structures) in the path of the emitted gaseous plume as well as the terrain surface roughness (which may be characterized by the more generic parameters "rural" or "city" terrain).


'''Industrial cooling towers''' are heat rejection devices used primarily to supply circulating cooling water to industrial facilities. The circulating cooling water absorbs heat by cooling and/or condensing hot process streams within the industrial facilites and the cooling towers reject that absorbed heat to the [[atmosphere]].  
Many of the modern, advanced dispersion modeling programs include a pre-processor module for the input of meteorological and other data, and many also include a post-processor module for graphing the output data and/or plotting the area impacted by the air pollutants on maps. The plots of areas impacted usually include isopleths showing areas of pollutant concentrations that define areas of the highest health risk. The isopleths plots are useful in determining protective actions for the public and first responders.


Cooling towers may either use the [[evaporation]] of water to reject process heat and cool the circulating water to near the [[Wet-bulb temperature|wet-bulb air temperature]] or rely solely on air to cool the circulating cooling water to near the  [[Dry-bulb temperature|dry-bulb air temperature]].  The towers may be [[hyperboloid structure]]s (as in Image 1) that can be up to 200 metres tall and 100 metres in diameter, or rectangular structures (as in Image 2) that can be over 40 metres tall and 80 metres long.  
The atmospheric dispersion models are also known as atmospheric diffusion models, air dispersion models, air quality models, and air pollution dispersion models.


==Applications==
==Atmospheric layers==


Common applications include cooling the circulating water used in [[oil refineries]], [[chemical plant]]s, [[power plants]] and building cooling.
Discussion of the layers in the Earth's atmosphere is needed to understand where airborne pollutants disperse in the atmosphere. The layer closest to the Earth's surface is known as the ''troposphere''. It extends from sea-level up to a height of about 18 km and contains about 80 percent of the mass of the overall atmosphere. The ''stratosphere'' is the next layer and extends from 18 km up to about 50 km. The third layer is the ''mesosphere'' which extends from 50 km up to about 80 km. There are other layers above 80 km, but they are insignificant with respect to atmospheric dispersion modeling.


The primary use of large, industrial cooling towers is to remove the heat absorbed in the circulating cooling water systems used in [[power plants]], [[oil refinery|petroleum refineries]], [[petrochemical]] plants, [[natural gas]] processing plants, food processing plants, semi-conductor plants, and other industrial facilities. The circulation rate of cooling water in a typical 700 MW coal-fired power plant with a cooling tower amounts to about 71,600 cubic metres an hour (315,000 U.S. gallons per minute)<ref> [http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/presentations/maulbetsch.pdf  Cooling System Retrofit Costs] EPA Workshop on Cooling Water Intake Technologies, John Maulbetsch, Maulbetsch Consulting, May 2003</ref> and the circulating water requires a supply water make-up rate of perhaps 5 percent (i.e., 3,600 cubic metres an hour).
The lowest part of the troposphere is called the ''atmospheric boundary layer (ABL)'' or the ''planetary boundary layer (PBL)'' and extends from the Earth's surface up to about 1.5 to 2.0 km in height. The air temperature of the atmospheric boundary layer decreases with increasing altitude until it reaches what is called the ''inversion layer'' (where the temperature increases with increasing altitude) that caps the atmospheric boundary layer. The upper part of the troposphere (i.e., above the inversion layer) is called the ''free troposphere'' and it extends up to the 18 km height of the troposphere.


If that same plant had no cooling tower and used once-through cooling water, it would require  about 100,000 cubic metres an hour <ref>{{PDFlink|[http://204.154.137.14/technologies/coalpower/ewr/pubs/IEP_Power_Plant_Water_R&D_Final_1.pdf Department of Energy]|297&nbsp;[[Kibibyte|KiB]]<!-- application/pdf, 304538 bytes -->}} Office of Fossil Energy's Power Plant Water Management R&D Program</ref> and that amount of water would have to be continuously returned to the ocean, lake or river from which it was obtained and continuously re-supplied to the plant. Furthermore, discharging large amounts of hot water may raise the temperature of the receiving river or lake to an unacceptable level for the local ecosystem. A cooling tower serves to dissipate the heat into the atmosphere instead and wind and air diffusion spreads the heat over a much larger area than hot water can distribute heat in a body of water.
The ABL is the most important layer with respect to the emission, transport and dispersion of airborne pollutants. The part of the ABL between the Earth's surface and the bottom of the inversion layer is known as the ''mixing layer''. Almost all of the airborne pollutants emitted into the ambient atmosphere are transported and dispersed within the mixing layer. Some of the emissions penetrate the inversion layer and enter the free troposphere above the ABL.
[[Image:KKP_Auslauf.jpg|thumb|Cooling tower and water discharge of a nuclear power plant]]
Some coal-fired and nuclear power plants located in coastal areas do make use of once-through ocean water. But even there, the offshore discharge water outlet requires very careful design to avoid environmental problems.


Petroleum refineries also have very large cooling tower systems. A typical large refinery processing 40,000 metric tonnes of crude oil per day (300,000 barrels per day) circulates about 80,000 cubic metres of water per hour through its cooling tower system.
In summary, the layers of the Earth's atmosphere from the surface of the ground upwards are: the ABL made up of the mixing layer capped by the inversion layer; the free troposphere; the stratosphere; the mesosphere and others. Many atmospheric dispersion models are referred to as ''boundary layer models'' because they mainly model air pollutant dispersion within the ABL. To avoid confusion, models referred to as ''mesoscale models'' have dispersion modeling capabilities that can extend horizontally as much as  a few hundred kilometres. It does not mean that they model dispersion in the mesosphere.


The world's tallest cooling tower is the 200 metre tall cooling tower of [[Niederaussem Power Station]].
==Gaussian air pollutant dispersion equation==


==Heat transfer methods==
The technical literature on air pollution dispersion is quite extensive and dates back to the 1930s and earlier. One of the early air pollutant plume dispersion equations was derived by Bosanquet and Pearson.<ref>C.H. Bosanquet and J.L. Pearson, "The spread of smoke and gases from chimneys", ''Trans. Faraday Soc.'', 32:1249, 1936.</ref> Their equation did not assume Gaussian distribution nor did it include the effect of ground reflection of the pollutant plume.
[[Image:factory_assembled_crossflow.jpg|thumb|250px|Image 3: Mechanical draft crossflow cooling tower used in an HVAC application]]
With respect to the [[heat transfer]] mechanism employed, the main types are:
* ''Wet cooling towers'' or simply ''cooling towers'' operate on the principle of [[Evaporative cooling|evaporation]].
* ''Dry coolers'' operate by [[heat transmission]] through a surface that divides the working fluid from ambient air. They thus rely mainly on convection heat transfer to reject heat from the working fluid, rather than evaporation.
* ''Fluid coolers'' are hybrids that pass the working fluid through a tube bundle, upon which clean water is sprayed and a fan-induced draft applied. The resulting heat transfer performance is much closer to that of a wet cooling tower, with the advantage provided by a dry cooler of protecting the working fluid from environmental exposure.


In a wet cooling tower, the warm water can be cooled to a temperature lower than the ambient air dry-bulb temperature, if the air is relatively dry. (see: [[dew point]] and [[psychrometrics]]). As  air is drawn past a flow of water, the two flows attempt to equalize. The air, if not saturated, absorbs additional water vapor, leaving less heat in the remaining water flow.
Sir Graham Sutton derived an air pollutant plume dispersion equation in 1947<ref>O.G. Sutton, "The problem of diffusion in the lower atmosphere", ''QJRMS'', 73:257, 1947.</ref><ref>O.G. Sutton, "The theoretical distribution of airborne pollution from factory chimneys", ''QJRMS'', 73:426, 1947.</ref> which did include the assumption of Gaussian distribution for the vertical and crosswind dispersion of the plume and also included the effect of ground reflection of the plume.


To achieve better performance (more cooling), a media called ''fill'' is used to increase the surface area between the air and water flows. ''Splash fill'' consists of material placed to interrupt the water flow causing splashing. ''Film fill'' is composed of thin sheets of material upon which the water flows.  Both methods create increased surface area.
Under the stimulus provided by the advent of stringent environmental control regulations, there was an immense growth in the use of air pollutant plume dispersion calculations between the late 1960s and today. A great many computer programs for calculating the dispersion of air pollutant emissions were developed during that period of time and they were commonly called "air dispersion models". The basis for most of those models was the '''Complete Equation For Gaussian Dispersion Modeling Of Continuous, Buoyant Air Pollution Plumes''' shown below:<ref name=Beychok>{{cite book|author=M.R. Beychok|title=Fundamentals Of Stack Gas Dispersion|edition=4th Edition| publisher=author-published|year=2005|isbn=0-9644588-0-2}}.</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=D. B. Turner| title=Workbook of atmospheric dispersion estimates: an introduction to dispersion modeling| edition=2nd Edition |publisher=CRC Press|year=1994|isbn=1-56670-023-X}}.</ref>


==Air flow generation methods==


With respect to drawing air through the tower, there are three types of cooling towers:
<math>C = \frac{\;Q}{u}\cdot\frac{\;f}{\sigma_y\sqrt{2\pi}}\;\cdot\frac{\;g_1 + g_2 + g_3}{\sigma_z\sqrt{2\pi}}</math>
* [[Stack effect|''Natural draft'']], which utilizes buoyancy via a tall chimney.  Warm, moist air ''naturally'' rises due to the density differential to the dry, cooler outside air. Warm [[Lighter_than_air#Water_vapour|moist air]] is less dense than drier air at the same temperature and pressure.  This moist air buoyancy produces a current of air through the tower.
* ''Mechanical draft'', which uses power driven fan motors to force or draw air through the tower.
** ''Induced draft'': A mechanical draft tower with a fan at the discharge which pulls air through tower. The fan ''induces'' hot moist air out the discharge. This produces low entering and high exiting air velocities, reducing the possibility  of ''recirculation'' in which discharged air flows back into the air intake.  This fan/fill arrangement is also known as ''draw-through''.  (see Image 2, 3)
** ''Forced draft'': A mechanical draft tower with a blower type fan at the intake. The fan ''forces'' air into the tower, creating high entering and low exiting air velocities. The low exiting velocity is much more susceptible to recirculation. With the fan on the air intake, the fan is more susceptible to complications due to freezing conditions. Another disadvantage is that a forced draft design typically requires more motor horsepower than an equivalent induced draft design. The forced draft benefit is its ability to work with high static pressure. They can be installed in more confined spaces and even in some indoor situations. This fan/fill geometry is also known as ''blow-through''.  (see Image 4)
[[Image:forced_draft_cooling_tower.jpg|thumb|200px|right|Image 4: A forced draft cooling tower]]
* Fan assisted natural draft. A hybrid type that appears like a natural draft though airflow is assisted by a fan.


Hyperboloid (aka hyperbolic) cooling towers (Image 1) have become the design standard for all natural-draft cooling towers because of their structural strength and minimum usage of material.
{| border="0" cellpadding="2"
The hyperbolic form is popularly associated with [[nuclear power plant]]s. However, this association is misleading, as the same kind of cooling towers are often used at large coal-fired power plants as well. Similarly, not all nuclear power plants have cooling towers.
|-
 
|align=right|where:
==Categorization by air-to-water flow==
|&nbsp;
 
|-
===Crossflow===
!align=right|<math>f</math>  
Crossflow is a design in which the air flow is directed perpendicular to the water flow (see diagram below). Air flow enters one or more vertical faces of the cooling tower to meet the fill material. Water flows (perpendicular to the air) through the fill by gravity. The air continues through the fill and thus past the water flow into an open plenum area. A ''distribution'' or ''hot water basin'' consisting of a deep pan with holes or ''nozzles'' in the bottom is utilized in a crossflow tower. Gravity distributes the water through the nozzles uniformly across the fill material. 
|align=left|= crosswind dispersion parameter
 
|-
[[Image:Crossflow_diagram.PNG]]
!align=right|&nbsp;
 
|align=left|= <math>\exp\;[-\,y^2/\,(2\;\sigma_y^2\;)\;]</math>
===Counterflow===
|-
In a counterflow design the air flow is directly opposite of the water flow (see diagram below). Air flow first enters an
!align=right|<math>g</math>
open area beneath the fill media and is then drawn up vertically. The water is sprayed through pressurized nozzles and flows downward through the fill, opposite to the air flow.
|align=left|= vertical dispersion parameter = <math>\,g_1 + g_2 + g_3</math>
 
|-
[[Image:Counterflow_diagram.PNG]]
!align=right|<math>g_1</math>
 
|align=left|= vertical dispersion with no reflections
Common to both designs:
|-
*The interaction of the air and water flow allow a partial equalization and evaporation of water.
!align=right|&nbsp;
*The air, now saturated with water vapor, is discharged from the cooling tower.
|align=left|= <math>\; \exp\;[-\,(z - H)^2/\,(2\;\sigma_z^2\;)\;]</math>
*A ''collection'' or ''cold water basin'' is used to contain the water after its interaction with the air flow. 
|-
 
!align=right|<math>g_2</math>
Both crossflow and counterflow designs can be used in natural draft and mechanical draft cooling towers.
|align=left|= vertical dispersion for reflection from the ground
 
|-
==Cooling tower as a flue gas stack==
!align=right|&nbsp;
 
|align=left|= <math>\;\exp\;[-\,(z + H)^2/\,(2\;\sigma_z^2\;)\;]</math>
At some modern power stations, equipped with [[Flue gas desulfurization|flue gas purification]] like the [[Power Station Staudinger Grosskrotzenburg]] and the [[Power Station Rostock]], the cooling tower is also used as a [[flue gas stack]] (industrial chimney). At plants without flue gas purification, this causes problems with corrosion.
|-
 
!align=right|<math>g_3</math>
==Wet cooling tower material balance==
|align=left|= vertical dispersion for reflection from an inversion aloft
 
|-
Quantitatively, the material balance around a wet, evaporative  cooling tower system is governed by the operational variables of makeup [[flow rate]], [[evaporation]] and windage losses, draw-off rate, and the concentration cycles:<ref name=Beychok>{{cite book | author=Beychok, Milton R. | title=[[Aqueous Wastes from Petroleum and Petrochemical Plants]] |edition=1st Edition | publisher=John Wiley and Sons | year=1967|id=[[Library of Congress Control Number|LCCN 67019834]]}} (available in many university libraries)</ref>
!align=right|&nbsp;
 
|align=left|= <math>\sum_{m=1}^\infty\;\big\{\exp\;[-\,(z - H - 2mL)^2/\,(2\;\sigma_z^2\;)\;]</math>
[[image:CoolingTower.png]]
|-
 
!align=right|&nbsp;
{| border="0" cellpadding="2"
|align=left|&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <math>+\, \exp\;[-\,(z + H + 2mL)^2/\,(2\;\sigma_z^2\;)\;]</math>
|-
!align=right|&nbsp;
|align=left|&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <math>+\, \exp\;[-\,(z + H - 2mL)^2/\,(2\;\sigma_z^2\;)\;]</math>
|-
!align=right|&nbsp;
|align=left|&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <math>+\, \exp\;[-\,(z - H + 2mL)^2/\,(2\;\sigma_z^2\;)\;]\big\}</math>
|-
!align=right|<math>C</math>
|align=left|= concentration of emissions, in g/m³, at any receptor located:
|-
|-
|align=right| '''M'''
!align=right|&nbsp;
|align=left|= Make-up water in m³/hr
|align=left|&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; x meters downwind from the emission source point
|-
|-
|align=right| '''C'''
!align=right|&nbsp;
|align=left|= Circulating water in m³/hr
|align=left|&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; y meters crosswind from the emission plume centerline
|-
|-
|align=right| '''D'''
!align=right|&nbsp;
|align=left|= Draw-off water in m³/hr
|align=left|&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; z meters above ground level
|-
|-
|align=right| '''E'''
!align=right|<math>Q</math>
|align=left|= Evaporated water in /hr
|align=left|= source pollutant emission rate, in g/s
|-
|-
|align=right| '''W'''
!align=right|<math>u</math>
|align=left|= Windage loss of water in m³/hr
|align=left|= horizontal wind velocity along the plume centerline, m/s
|-
|-
|align=right| '''X'''
!align=right|<math>H</math>
|align=left|= Concentration in [[parts per notation|ppmw]] (of any completely soluble salts … usually chlorides)
|align=left|= height of emission plume centerline above ground level, in m
|-
|-
|align=right| '''X<sub>M</sub>'''
!align=right|<math>\sigma_z</math>
|align=left|= Concentration of [[chloride]]s in make-up water (M), in ppmw
|align=left|= vertical standard deviation of the emission distribution, in m
|-
|-
|align=right| '''X<sub>C</sub>'''
!align=right|<math>\sigma_y</math>
|align=left|= Concentration of chlorides in circulating water (C), in ppmw
|align=left|= horizontal standard deviation of the emission distribution, in m
|-
|-
|align=right| '''Cycles'''
!align=right|<math>L</math>
|align=left|= Cycles of concentration = X<sub>C</sub> / X<sub>M</sub> (dimensionless)
|align=left|= height from ground level to bottom of the inversion aloft, in m
|-
|-
|align=right| '''ppmw'''
!align=right|<math>\exp</math>
|align=left|= parts per million by weight
|align=left|= the exponential function
|}
|}


In the above sketch, water pumped from the tower basin is the cooling water routed through the process coolers and [[condenser (steam turbine)|condensers]] in an industrial facility. The cool water absorbs heat from the hot process streams which need to be cooled or condensed, and the absorbed heat warms the circulating water (C). The warm water returns to the top of the cooling tower and trickles downward over the fill material inside the tower. As it trickles down, it contacts ambient air rising up through the tower either by natural draft or by forced draft using large fans in the tower. That contact causes a small amount of the water to be lost as windage (W) and some of the water (E) to [[evaporation|evaporate]]. The heat required to evaporate  the water is derived from the water itself, which cools the water back to the original basin water temperature and the water is then ready to recirculate. The evaporated water leaves its dissolved [[salt]]s behind in the bulk of the water which has not been evaporated, thus raising the salt concentration in the circulating cooling water. To prevent the salt concentration of the water from becoming too high, a portion of the water is drawn off (D) for disposal. Fresh water makeup (M) is supplied to the tower basin to compensate for the loss of evaporated water, the windage loss water and the draw-off water.
The above equation not only includes upward reflection from the ground, it also includes downward reflection from the bottom of any inversion lid present in the atmosphere.
 
The sum of the four exponential terms in <math>g_3</math> converges to a final value quite rapidly. For most cases, the summation of the series with '''''m''''' = 1, '''''m''''' = 2 and '''''m''''' = 3 will provide an adequate solution.
 
<math>\sigma_z</math> and <math>\sigma_y</math> are functions of the atmospheric stability class (i.e., a measure of the turbulence in the ambient atmosphere) and of the downwind distance to the receptor. The two most important variables affecting the degree of pollutant emission dispersion obtained are the height of the emission source point and the degree of atmospheric turbulence. The more turbulence, the better the degree of dispersion.


A water balance around the entire system is:
Whereas older models rely on stability classes for the determination of <math>\sigma_y</math> and <math>\sigma_z</math>, more recent models increasingly rely on Monin-Obukhov similarity theory to derive these parameters.


:M = E + D + W
==Briggs plume rise equations==


Since the evaporated water (E) has no salts, a chloride balance around the system is:
The Gaussian air pollutant dispersion equation (discussed above) requires the input of ''H'' which is the pollutant plume's centerline height above ground level. ''H'' is the sum of ''H''<sub>s</sub> (the actual physical height of the pollutant plume's emission source point) plus Δ''H'' (the plume rise due the plume's buoyancy).


:M (X<sub>M</sub>) = D (X<sub>C</sub>) + W (X<sub>C</sub>) = X<sub>C</sub> (D + W)
[[File:Gaussian Plume.png|thumb|right|333px|Visualization of a buoyant Gaussian air pollutant dispersion plume]]


and, therefore:
To determine Δ''H'', many if not most of the air dispersion models developed between the late 1960s and the early 2000s used what are known as "the Briggs equations." G.A. Briggs first published his plume rise observations and comparisons in 1965.<ref>G.A. Briggs, "A plume rise model compared with observations", ''JAPCA'', 15:433–438, 1965.</ref> In 1968, at a symposium sponsored by CONCAWE (a Dutch organization), he compared many of the plume rise models then available in the literature.<ref>G.A. Briggs, "CONCAWE meeting: discussion of the comparative consequences of different plume rise formulas", ''Atmos. Envir.'', 2:228–232, 1968.</ref> In that same year, Briggs also wrote the section of the publication edited by Slade<ref>D.H. Slade (editor), "Meteorology and atomic energy 1968", Air Resources Laboratory, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 1968.</ref> dealing with the comparative analyses of plume rise models.  That was followed in 1969 by his classical critical review of the entire plume rise literature,<ref>G.A. Briggs, "Plume Rise", ''USAEC Critical Review Series'', 1969.</ref> in which he proposed a set of plume rise equations which have become widely known as "the Briggs equations".  Subsequently, Briggs modified his 1969 plume rise equations in 1971 and in 1972.<ref>G.A. Briggs, "Some recent analyses of plume rise observation", ''Proc. Second Internat'l. Clean Air Congress'', Academic Press, New York, 1971.</ref><ref>G.A. Briggs, "Discussion: chimney plumes in neutral and stable surroundings", ''Atmos. Envir.'', 6:507–510, 1972.</ref>


:'''X<sub>C</sub> / X<sub>M</sub> = Cycles of concentration = M ÷ (D + W) = M ÷ (M – E) = 1 + [E ÷ (D + W)]'''
Briggs divided air pollution plumes into these four general categories:
* Cold jet plumes in calm ambient air conditions
* Cold jet plumes in windy ambient air conditions
* Hot, buoyant plumes in calm ambient air conditions
* Hot, buoyant plumes in windy ambient air conditions


From a simplified heat balance around the cooling tower:
Briggs considered the trajectory of cold jet plumes to be dominated by their initial velocity momentum, and the trajectory of hot, buoyant plumes to be dominated by their buoyant momentum to the extent that their initial velocity momentum was relatively unimportant.  Although Briggs proposed plume rise equations for each of the above plume categories, '''''it is important to emphasize that "the Briggs equations" which become widely used are those that he proposed for bent-over, hot buoyant plumes'''''.


:'''E = C · ΔT · c<sub>p</sub> ÷ H<sub>V</sub>'''
In general, Briggs's equations for bent-over, hot buoyant plumes are based on observations and data involving plumes from typical combustion sources such as the flue gas stacks from steam-generating boilers burning fossil fuels in large power plants.  Therefore the stack exit velocities were probably in the range of 20 to 100 ft/s (6 to 30 m/s) with exit temperatures ranging from 250 to 500 °F (120 to 260 °C).


{| border="0" cellpadding="2"
A logic diagram for using the Briggs equations<ref name=Beychok/> to obtain the plume rise trajectory of bent-over buoyant plumes is presented below:
[[Image:BriggsLogic.png|none]]
:{| border="0" cellpadding="2"
|-
|-
|align=right|where:
|align=right|where:
|&nbsp;
|&nbsp;
|-
|-
|align=right| '''H<sub>V</sub>'''
!align=right| Δh
|align=left|= latent heat of vaporization of water = ca. 2260 kJ / kg
|align=left|= plume rise, in m
|-
|-
|align=right| '''ΔT'''
!align=right| F<sup>&nbsp;</sup> <!-- The HTML is needed to line up characters. Do not remove.-->
|align=left|= water temperature difference from tower top to tower bottom, in °C
|align=left|= buoyancy factor, in m<sup>4</sup>s<sup>−3</sup>
|-
|-
|align=right| '''c<sub>p</sub>'''
!align=right| x
|align=left|= specific heat of water = ca. 4.184 kJ / (kg<math>\cdot</math>°C)
|align=left|= downwind distance from plume source, in m
|-
!align=right| x<sub>f</sub>
|align=left|= downwind distance from plume source to point of maximum plume rise, in m
|-
!align=right| u
|align=left|= windspeed at actual stack height, in m/s
|-
!align=right| s<sup>&nbsp;</sup> <!-- The HTML is needed to line up characters. Do not remove.-->
|align=left|= stability parameter, in s<sup>−2</sup>
|}
|}
The above parameters used in the Briggs' equations are discussed in Beychok's book.<ref name=Beychok/>


Windage (or drift) losses (W) from large-scale industrial cooling towers, in the absence of manufacturer's data, may be assumed to be:
==References==
 
{{reflist}}
:'''W''' = 0.3 to 1.0 percent of C for a natural draft cooling tower without windage drift eliminators
:'''W''' = 0.1 to 0.3 percent of C for an induced draft cooling tower without windage drift eliminators
:'''W''' = about 0.005 percent of C (or less) if the cooling tower has windage drift eliminators
 
Cycles of concentration represents the accumulation of dissolved minerals in the recirculating cooling water. Draw-off (or blowdown) is used principally to control the buildup of these minerals.
 
The chemistry of the makeup water including the amount of dissolved minerals can vary widely. Makeup waters low in dissolved minerals such as those from surface water supplies (lakes, rivers etc.) tend to be aggressive to metals (corrosive). Makeup waters from ground water supplies (wells) are usually higher in minerals and tend to be scaling (deposit minerals). Increasing the amount of minerals present in the water by cycling can make water less aggressive to piping however excessive levels of minerals can cause scaling problems.
 
As the cycles of concentration increase the water may not be able to hold the minerals in solution. When the [[solubility]] of these minerals have been exceeded they can [[precipitate]] out as mineral solids and cause fouling and heat exchange problems in the cooling tower or the [[heat exchangers]]. The temperatures of the recirculating water, piping and heat exchange surfaces determine if and where minerals will precipitate from the recirculating water. Often a professional water treatment consultant will evaluate the makeup water and the operating conditions of the cooling tower and recommend an appropriate range for the cycles of concentration. The use of water treatment chemicals, pretreatment such as [[water softening]], [[pH]] adjustment, and other techniques can affect the acceptable range of cycles of concentration.
                                     
Concentration cycles in the majority of cooling towers usually range from 3 to 7. In the United States the majority of water supplies are well waters and have significant levels of dissolved solids. On the other hand one of the largest water supplies, New York City, has a surface supply quite low in minerals and cooling towers in that city are often allowed to concentrate to 7 or more cycles of concentration.
 
Besides treating the circulating cooling water in large industrial cooling tower systems to minimize [[scaling]] and [[fouling]], the water should be [[Filter (water)|filtered]] and also be dosed with [[biocide]]s and [[algaecide]]s to prevent growths that could interfere with the continuous flow of the water.<ref name=Beychok/>  For closed loop evaporative towers, [[corrosion inhibitors]] may be used, but caution should be taken to meet local environmental regulations as some inhibitors use [[chromate]]s.
 
Ambient conditions dictate the efficiency of any given tower due to the amount of water vapor the air is able to absorb and hold, as can be determined on a psychrometric chart.
 
==Cooling towers and Legionnaires' disease==
 
{{further|[[Legionellosis ]] and [[Legionella]]}}
 
Another very important reason for using biocides in cooling towers is to prevent the growth of '''''[[Legionella]]''''', including species that cause [[legionellosis]] or '''''Legionnaires' disease''''', most notably ''L. pneumophilia''<ref>{{cite book|author=Ryan K.J.; Ray C.G. (editors)|title=Sherris Medical Microbiology|edition=4th Edition|publisher=McGraw Hill|year=2004|id=ISBN 0-8385-8529-9}}</ref>. The various ''Legionella'' species are the cause of ''Legionnaires' disease'' in humans and transmission is via exposure to [[particulate|aerosol]]s&mdash;the inhalation of mist droplets containing the bacteria. Common sources of ''Legionella'' include cooling towers used in open recirculating evaporative cooling water systems, domestic hot water systems, fountains, and similar disseminators that tap into a public water supply. Natural sources include freshwater ponds and creeks.
 
French researchers found that ''Legionella'' spread through the air up to 6 kilometres from a large contaminated cooling tower at a petrochemical plant in Pas-de-Calais, France. That outbreak killed 21 of the 86 people that had a laboratory-confirmed infection.<ref>[http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/521680 Airborne Legionella May Travel Several Kilometers] (access requires free registration)</ref>
 
Drift (or windage) is the term for water droplets of the process flow allowed to escape in the cooling tower discharge.  Drift eliminators are used hold drift rates typically to 0.001%-0.005% of the circulating flow rate. A typical drift eliminator provides multiple directional changes of airflow while preventing the escape of water droplets. A well-designed and well-fitted drift eliminator can greatly reduce water loss and potential for Legionella or other chemical exposure. 


Many governmental agencies, cooling tower manufacturers and industrial trade organizations have developed design and maintenance guidelines for preventing or controlling the growth of ''Legionella'' in cooling towers. Below is a list of sources for such guidelines:
== Further reading==


*{{PDFlink|[http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/pdf/guidelines/Enviro_guide_03.pdf  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]|1.35&nbsp;[[Mebibyte|MiB]]<!-- application/pdf, 1422000 bytes -->}} - Procedure for Cleaning Cooling Towers and Related Equipment (pages 239 and 240 of 249)
*{{cite book | author=M.R. Beychok| title=Fundamentals Of Stack Gas Dispersion | edition=4th Edition | publisher=author-published | year=2005 | isbn=0-9644588-0-2}}
*{{PDFlink|[http://www.cti.org/downloads/legion_2000.pdf Cooling Technology Institute]|76.2&nbsp;[[Kibibyte|KiB]]<!-- application/pdf, 78076 bytes -->}} - Best Practices for Control of Legionella
*{{PDFlink|[http://www.awt.org/Legionella03.pdf Association of Water Technologies]|964&nbsp;[[Kibibyte|KiB]]<!-- application/pdf, 987370 bytes -->}} - Legionella 2003
*{{PDFlink|[http://www.energy.ca.gov/2005publications/CEC-700-2005-025/CEC-700-2005-025.PDF California Energy Commission]|194&nbsp;[[Kibibyte|KiB]]<!-- application/pdf, 198829 bytes -->}} - Cooling Water Management Program Guidelines For Wet and Hybrid Cooling Towers at Power Plants
*{{PDFlink|[http://spxcooling.com/pdf/M99-1342.pdf SPX Cooling Technologies]|119&nbsp;[[Kibibyte|KiB]]<!-- application/pdf, 122849 bytes -->}} - Cooling Towers Maintenance Procedures
*{{PDFlink|[http://spxcooling.com/pdf/guide12.pdf SPX Cooling Technologies]|789&nbsp;[[Kibibyte|KiB]]<!-- application/pdf, 808804 bytes -->}} - ASHRAE Guideline 12-2000 - Minimizing the Risk of Legionellosis
*{{PDFlink|[http://spxcooling.com/pdf/M92-1474C.pdf SPX Cooling Technologies]|80.1&nbsp;[[Kibibyte|KiB]]<!-- application/pdf, 82093 bytes -->}} - Cooling Tower Inspection Tips {especially page 3 of 7}
*{{PDFlink|[http://www.towertechinc.com/documents/Legionella_Control_White_Paper_05072004.pdf Tower Tech Modular Cooling Towers]|109&nbsp;[[Kibibyte|KiB]]<!-- application/pdf, 111897 bytes -->}} - Legionella Control
*{{PDFlink|[http://www.gewater.com/pdf/tech73.pdf GE Infrastructure Water & Process Technologies Betz Dearborn]|195&nbsp;[[Kibibyte|KiB]]<!-- application/pdf, 200231 bytes -->}} - Chemical Water Treatment Recommendations For Reduction of Risks Associated with Legionella in Open Recirculating Cooling Water Systems


==Cooling tower malfunctions==
*{{cite book | author=K.B. Schnelle and P.R. Dey| title=Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling Compliance Guide  | edition=1st Edition| publisher=McGraw-Hill Professional | year=1999 | isbn=0-07-058059-6}}
Under certain ambient conditions, plumes of water vapor (fog) can be seen rising out of the discharge from a cooling tower (see Image 1), and can be mistaken as smoke from a fire.  If the outdoor air is at or near saturation, and the tower adds more water to the air, saturated air with liquid water droplets can be discharged -- what we see as fog.  This phenomenon typically occurs on cool, humid days, but is rare in many climates.


Failures that let smaller amounts of water go the top of a cooling tower can cause a tower to freeze (especially if the fans are running at high speeds). If a roof-mounted cooling tower is allowed to freeze and build up ice, the ice can grow to massive sizes and can result in the tower falling through the roof (note: this assumes that the ice 'grows' beyond the typical liquid volume). 
*{{cite book | author=D.B. Turner| title=Workbook of Atmospheric Dispersion Estimates: An Introduction to Dispersion Modeling | edition=2nd Edition | publisher=CRC Press | year=1994 | isbn=1-56670-023-X}}


Typical methods to circumvent freezing are: air flow through the tower is reduced, a basin heater is installed, a heater is installed indoors on the water loop, a drain system or remote basin design is used, and in some cases where evaporative closed loop towers are used the tower spray water is drained completely.
*{{cite book | author= S.P. Arya| title=Air Pollution Meteorology and Dispersion | edition=1st Edition | publisher=Oxford University Press | year=1998 | isbn=0-19-507398-3}}


===Cooling Tower Operation In Freezing Weather===
*{{cite book | author=R. Barrat| title=Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling | edition=1st Edition | publisher=Earthscan Publications | year=2001 | isbn=1-85383-642-7}}
Cooling towers with malfunctions can freeze during very cold weather. Typically, freezing starts at the corners of a cooling tower with a reduced or absent heat load. Increased freezing conditions can create growing volumes of ice, resulting in increased structural loads. During the winter, some sites continuously operate cooling towers with 40 °F water leaving the tower.  Basin heaters, tower draindown, and other freeze protection methods are often employed in cold climates.


* Do not operate the tower unattended.
*{{cite book | author=S.R. Hanna and R.E. Britter| title=Wind Flow and Vapor Cloud Dispersion at Industrial and Urban Sites  | edition=1st Edition | publisher=Wiley-American Institute of Chemical Engineers | year=2002 | isbn=0-8169-0863-X}}


* Do not operate the tower without a heat load. This can include basin heaters and heat trace. Basin heaters maintain the temperature of the water in the tower pan at an acceptable level. Heat trace is a resistive element that runs along water pipes located in cold climates to prevent freezing.
*{{cite book | author=P. Zannetti| title=Air pollution modeling : theories, computational methods, and available software | edition= | publisher= Van Nostrand Reinhold | year=1990 | isbn=0-442-30805-1 }}
 
* Maintain design water flow rate over the fill.
 
* Manipulate airflow to maintain water temperature above freezing point.<ref>{{PDFlink|[http://spxcooling.com/pdf/H-003B.pdf SPX Cooling Technologies: Operating Cooling Towers in Freezing Weather]|1.45&nbsp;[[Mebibyte|MiB]]<!-- application/pdf, 1523128 bytes -->}}</ref>
 
==Some commonly used terms in the cooling tower industry==
 
*Drift - Water droplets that are carried out of the cooling tower with the exhaust air. Drift droplets have the same concentration of impurities as the water entering the tower. The drift rate is typically reduced by employing baffle-like devices, called drift eliminators, through which the air must travel after leaving the fill and spray zones of the tower.
 
*Blow-out - Water droplets blown out of the cooling tower by wind, generally at the air inlet openings. Water may also be lost, in the absence of wind, through splashing or misting. Devices such as wind screens, louvers, splash deflectors and water diverters are used to limit these losses.
 
*Plume - The stream of saturated exhaust air leaving the cooling tower. The plume is visible when water vapor it contains condenses in contact with cooler ambient air, like the saturated air in one's breath fogs on a cold day. Under certain conditions, a cooling tower plume may present fogging or icing hazards to its surroundings. Note that the water evaporated in the cooling process is "pure" water, in contrast to the very small percentage of drift droplets or water blown out of the air inlets.
 
*Blow-down - The portion of the circulating water flow that is removed in order to maintain the amount of [[Total dissolved solids|dissolved solids]] and other impurities at an acceptable level. It may be noted that higher TDS (total dissolved solids) concentration in solution results in greater potential cooling tower efficiency. However the higher the TDS concentration, the greater the risk of scale, biological growth and corrosion.
 
*Leaching - The loss of wood preservative chemicals by the washing action of the water flowing through a wood structure cooling tower.
 
*Noise - Sound energy emitted by a cooling tower and heard (recorded) at a given distance and direction. The sound is generated by the impact of falling water, by the movement of air by fans, the fan blades moving in the structure, and the motors, gearboxes or drive belts.
 
*Approach - The approach is the difference in temperature between the cooled-water temperature and the entering-air [[Wet-bulb temperature|wet bulb temperature]] (twb). Since the cooling towers are based on the principles of evaporative cooling, the maximum cooling tower efficiency depends on the wet bulb temperature of the air.
 
*Range - The range is the temperature difference between the water inlet and water exit.
 
*Fill - Inside the tower, fills are added to increase contact surface as well as contact time between air and water. Thus they provide better heat transfer. The efficiency of the tower also depends on them. There are two types of fills that may be used:       
**Film type fill (causes water to spread into a thin film)
**Splash type fill (breaks up water and interrupts its vertical progress)
 
==Fire hazards==
Cooling towers which are constructed in whole or in part of combustible materials can support propagating internal fires. The resulting damage can be sufficiently severe to require the replacement of the entire cell or tower structure. For this reason, some [[model building code|code]]s and standards<ref>NFPA 214, ''Standard for Water Cooling Towers''</ref> recommend combustible cooling towers be provided with an automatic [[fire sprinkler system]]. Fires can propagate internally within the tower structure during maintenance when the cell is not in operation (such as for maintenance or construction), and even when the tower is in operation, especially those of the induced-draft type because of the existence of relatively dry areas within the towers<ref>NFPA 214, ''Standard for Water Cooling Towers'', section A1.1</ref>.
 
==References==
{{reflist}}

Latest revision as of 04:25, 22 November 2023


The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.


Industrial air pollution source

Atmospheric dispersion modeling is the mathematical simulation of how air pollutants disperse in the ambient atmosphere. It is performed with computer programs that solve the mathematical equations and algorithms which simulate the pollutant dispersion. The dispersion models are used to estimate or to predict the downwind concentration of air pollutants emitted from sources such as industrial plants, vehicular traffic or accidental chemical releases.

Such models are important to governmental agencies tasked with protecting and managing the ambient air quality. The models are typically employed to determine whether existing or proposed new industrial facilities are or will be in compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) in the United States or similar regulations in other nations. The models also serve to assist in the design of effective control strategies to reduce emissions of harmful air pollutants. During the late 1960's, the Air Pollution Control Office of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) initiated research projects to develop models for use by urban and transportation planners.[1]

Air dispersion models are also used by emergency management personnel to develop emergency plans for accidental chemical releases. The results of dispersion modeling, using worst case accidental releases and meteorological conditions, can provide estimated locations of impacted areas and be used to determine appropriate protective actions. At industrial facilities in the United States, this type of consequence assessment or emergency planning is required under the Clean Air Act (CAA) codified in Part 68 of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

The dispersion models vary depending on the mathematics used to develop the model, but all require the input of data that may include:

  • Meteorological conditions such as wind speed and direction, the amount of atmospheric turbulence (as characterized by what is called the "stability class"), the ambient air temperature, the height to the bottom of any inversion aloft that may be present, cloud cover and solar radiation.
  • The emission parameters such the type of source (i.e., point, line or area), the mass flow rate, the source location and height, the source exit velocity, and the source exit temperature.
  • Terrain elevations at the source location and at receptor locations, such as nearby homes, schools, businesses and hospitals.
  • The location, height and width of any obstructions (such as buildings or other structures) in the path of the emitted gaseous plume as well as the terrain surface roughness (which may be characterized by the more generic parameters "rural" or "city" terrain).

Many of the modern, advanced dispersion modeling programs include a pre-processor module for the input of meteorological and other data, and many also include a post-processor module for graphing the output data and/or plotting the area impacted by the air pollutants on maps. The plots of areas impacted usually include isopleths showing areas of pollutant concentrations that define areas of the highest health risk. The isopleths plots are useful in determining protective actions for the public and first responders.

The atmospheric dispersion models are also known as atmospheric diffusion models, air dispersion models, air quality models, and air pollution dispersion models.

Atmospheric layers

Discussion of the layers in the Earth's atmosphere is needed to understand where airborne pollutants disperse in the atmosphere. The layer closest to the Earth's surface is known as the troposphere. It extends from sea-level up to a height of about 18 km and contains about 80 percent of the mass of the overall atmosphere. The stratosphere is the next layer and extends from 18 km up to about 50 km. The third layer is the mesosphere which extends from 50 km up to about 80 km. There are other layers above 80 km, but they are insignificant with respect to atmospheric dispersion modeling.

The lowest part of the troposphere is called the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) or the planetary boundary layer (PBL) and extends from the Earth's surface up to about 1.5 to 2.0 km in height. The air temperature of the atmospheric boundary layer decreases with increasing altitude until it reaches what is called the inversion layer (where the temperature increases with increasing altitude) that caps the atmospheric boundary layer. The upper part of the troposphere (i.e., above the inversion layer) is called the free troposphere and it extends up to the 18 km height of the troposphere.

The ABL is the most important layer with respect to the emission, transport and dispersion of airborne pollutants. The part of the ABL between the Earth's surface and the bottom of the inversion layer is known as the mixing layer. Almost all of the airborne pollutants emitted into the ambient atmosphere are transported and dispersed within the mixing layer. Some of the emissions penetrate the inversion layer and enter the free troposphere above the ABL.

In summary, the layers of the Earth's atmosphere from the surface of the ground upwards are: the ABL made up of the mixing layer capped by the inversion layer; the free troposphere; the stratosphere; the mesosphere and others. Many atmospheric dispersion models are referred to as boundary layer models because they mainly model air pollutant dispersion within the ABL. To avoid confusion, models referred to as mesoscale models have dispersion modeling capabilities that can extend horizontally as much as a few hundred kilometres. It does not mean that they model dispersion in the mesosphere.

Gaussian air pollutant dispersion equation

The technical literature on air pollution dispersion is quite extensive and dates back to the 1930s and earlier. One of the early air pollutant plume dispersion equations was derived by Bosanquet and Pearson.[2] Their equation did not assume Gaussian distribution nor did it include the effect of ground reflection of the pollutant plume.

Sir Graham Sutton derived an air pollutant plume dispersion equation in 1947[3][4] which did include the assumption of Gaussian distribution for the vertical and crosswind dispersion of the plume and also included the effect of ground reflection of the plume.

Under the stimulus provided by the advent of stringent environmental control regulations, there was an immense growth in the use of air pollutant plume dispersion calculations between the late 1960s and today. A great many computer programs for calculating the dispersion of air pollutant emissions were developed during that period of time and they were commonly called "air dispersion models". The basis for most of those models was the Complete Equation For Gaussian Dispersion Modeling Of Continuous, Buoyant Air Pollution Plumes shown below:[5][6]


where:  
= crosswind dispersion parameter
  =
= vertical dispersion parameter =
= vertical dispersion with no reflections
  =
= vertical dispersion for reflection from the ground
  =
= vertical dispersion for reflection from an inversion aloft
  =
           
           
           
= concentration of emissions, in g/m³, at any receptor located:
            x meters downwind from the emission source point
            y meters crosswind from the emission plume centerline
            z meters above ground level
= source pollutant emission rate, in g/s
= horizontal wind velocity along the plume centerline, m/s
= height of emission plume centerline above ground level, in m
= vertical standard deviation of the emission distribution, in m
= horizontal standard deviation of the emission distribution, in m
= height from ground level to bottom of the inversion aloft, in m
= the exponential function

The above equation not only includes upward reflection from the ground, it also includes downward reflection from the bottom of any inversion lid present in the atmosphere.

The sum of the four exponential terms in converges to a final value quite rapidly. For most cases, the summation of the series with m = 1, m = 2 and m = 3 will provide an adequate solution.

and are functions of the atmospheric stability class (i.e., a measure of the turbulence in the ambient atmosphere) and of the downwind distance to the receptor. The two most important variables affecting the degree of pollutant emission dispersion obtained are the height of the emission source point and the degree of atmospheric turbulence. The more turbulence, the better the degree of dispersion.

Whereas older models rely on stability classes for the determination of and , more recent models increasingly rely on Monin-Obukhov similarity theory to derive these parameters.

Briggs plume rise equations

The Gaussian air pollutant dispersion equation (discussed above) requires the input of H which is the pollutant plume's centerline height above ground level. H is the sum of Hs (the actual physical height of the pollutant plume's emission source point) plus ΔH (the plume rise due the plume's buoyancy).

Visualization of a buoyant Gaussian air pollutant dispersion plume

To determine ΔH, many if not most of the air dispersion models developed between the late 1960s and the early 2000s used what are known as "the Briggs equations." G.A. Briggs first published his plume rise observations and comparisons in 1965.[7] In 1968, at a symposium sponsored by CONCAWE (a Dutch organization), he compared many of the plume rise models then available in the literature.[8] In that same year, Briggs also wrote the section of the publication edited by Slade[9] dealing with the comparative analyses of plume rise models. That was followed in 1969 by his classical critical review of the entire plume rise literature,[10] in which he proposed a set of plume rise equations which have become widely known as "the Briggs equations". Subsequently, Briggs modified his 1969 plume rise equations in 1971 and in 1972.[11][12]

Briggs divided air pollution plumes into these four general categories:

  • Cold jet plumes in calm ambient air conditions
  • Cold jet plumes in windy ambient air conditions
  • Hot, buoyant plumes in calm ambient air conditions
  • Hot, buoyant plumes in windy ambient air conditions

Briggs considered the trajectory of cold jet plumes to be dominated by their initial velocity momentum, and the trajectory of hot, buoyant plumes to be dominated by their buoyant momentum to the extent that their initial velocity momentum was relatively unimportant. Although Briggs proposed plume rise equations for each of the above plume categories, it is important to emphasize that "the Briggs equations" which become widely used are those that he proposed for bent-over, hot buoyant plumes.

In general, Briggs's equations for bent-over, hot buoyant plumes are based on observations and data involving plumes from typical combustion sources such as the flue gas stacks from steam-generating boilers burning fossil fuels in large power plants. Therefore the stack exit velocities were probably in the range of 20 to 100 ft/s (6 to 30 m/s) with exit temperatures ranging from 250 to 500 °F (120 to 260 °C).

A logic diagram for using the Briggs equations[5] to obtain the plume rise trajectory of bent-over buoyant plumes is presented below:

BriggsLogic.png
where:  
Δh = plume rise, in m
F  = buoyancy factor, in m4s−3
x = downwind distance from plume source, in m
xf = downwind distance from plume source to point of maximum plume rise, in m
u = windspeed at actual stack height, in m/s
s  = stability parameter, in s−2

The above parameters used in the Briggs' equations are discussed in Beychok's book.[5]

References

  1. J.C. Fensterstock et al, "Reduction of air pollution potential through environmental planning", JAPCA, Vol. 21, No. 7, 1971.
  2. C.H. Bosanquet and J.L. Pearson, "The spread of smoke and gases from chimneys", Trans. Faraday Soc., 32:1249, 1936.
  3. O.G. Sutton, "The problem of diffusion in the lower atmosphere", QJRMS, 73:257, 1947.
  4. O.G. Sutton, "The theoretical distribution of airborne pollution from factory chimneys", QJRMS, 73:426, 1947.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 M.R. Beychok (2005). Fundamentals Of Stack Gas Dispersion, 4th Edition. author-published. ISBN 0-9644588-0-2. .
  6. D. B. Turner (1994). Workbook of atmospheric dispersion estimates: an introduction to dispersion modeling, 2nd Edition. CRC Press. ISBN 1-56670-023-X. .
  7. G.A. Briggs, "A plume rise model compared with observations", JAPCA, 15:433–438, 1965.
  8. G.A. Briggs, "CONCAWE meeting: discussion of the comparative consequences of different plume rise formulas", Atmos. Envir., 2:228–232, 1968.
  9. D.H. Slade (editor), "Meteorology and atomic energy 1968", Air Resources Laboratory, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 1968.
  10. G.A. Briggs, "Plume Rise", USAEC Critical Review Series, 1969.
  11. G.A. Briggs, "Some recent analyses of plume rise observation", Proc. Second Internat'l. Clean Air Congress, Academic Press, New York, 1971.
  12. G.A. Briggs, "Discussion: chimney plumes in neutral and stable surroundings", Atmos. Envir., 6:507–510, 1972.

Further reading

  • M.R. Beychok (2005). Fundamentals Of Stack Gas Dispersion, 4th Edition. author-published. ISBN 0-9644588-0-2. 
  • K.B. Schnelle and P.R. Dey (1999). Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling Compliance Guide, 1st Edition. McGraw-Hill Professional. ISBN 0-07-058059-6. 
  • D.B. Turner (1994). Workbook of Atmospheric Dispersion Estimates: An Introduction to Dispersion Modeling, 2nd Edition. CRC Press. ISBN 1-56670-023-X. 
  • S.P. Arya (1998). Air Pollution Meteorology and Dispersion, 1st Edition. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-507398-3. 
  • R. Barrat (2001). Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling, 1st Edition. Earthscan Publications. ISBN 1-85383-642-7. 
  • S.R. Hanna and R.E. Britter (2002). Wind Flow and Vapor Cloud Dispersion at Industrial and Urban Sites, 1st Edition. Wiley-American Institute of Chemical Engineers. ISBN 0-8169-0863-X. 
  • P. Zannetti (1990). Air pollution modeling : theories, computational methods, and available software. Van Nostrand Reinhold. ISBN 0-442-30805-1.