Talk:Economics/Definition: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner (New page: This defines economics as though it were a purely academic activity. It is like defining medicine as the study of the human body. What's wrong with: ''The science of the production, distri...) |
imported>John Dvorak m (Template talk:Def Economics moved to Talk:Economics/Definition: Moving_definition) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This defines economics as though it were a purely academic activity. It is like defining medicine as the study of the human body. What's wrong with: | This defines economics as though it were a purely academic activity. It is like defining medicine as the study of the human body. What's wrong with: | ||
''The science of the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services.''? [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 02:19, 7 December 2007 (CST) | ''The science of the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services.''? [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 02:19, 7 December 2007 (CST) | ||
I have now amended it to remove the academic bias - [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 05:36, 1 February 2008 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:06, 23 May 2008
This defines economics as though it were a purely academic activity. It is like defining medicine as the study of the human body. What's wrong with: The science of the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services.? Nick Gardner 02:19, 7 December 2007 (CST) I have now amended it to remove the academic bias - Nick Gardner 05:36, 1 February 2008 (CST)