Talk:Petrarch: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Theodore Beale
No edit summary
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
Yes, Petrarch would be best.  His birth name was Francesco Petracco which he later latinized to Francesco Petrarca.  Petrarch is an Anglicization; alone it is common usage but Francesco Petrarch is historically incorrect. --{{unsigned|Theodore Beale}}
Yes, Petrarch would be best.  His birth name was Francesco Petracco which he later latinized to Francesco Petrarca.  Petrarch is an Anglicization; alone it is common usage but Francesco Petrarch is historically incorrect. --{{unsigned|Theodore Beale}}



Latest revision as of 13:55, 12 November 2007

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition (1304–74) Italian poet, humanist and essayist, and one of the most important intellectual figures of the early Renaissance. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Literature, Classics and History [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Yes, Petrarch would be best. His birth name was Francesco Petracco which he later latinized to Francesco Petrarca. Petrarch is an Anglicization; alone it is common usage but Francesco Petrarch is historically incorrect. --...said Theodore Beale (talk) (Please sign your talk page posts by simply adding four tildes, ~~~~.)


(edit conflict!)

Don't hesitate to move the article back to Francesco Petrarch; maybe that's right, I don't claim to know much about him. It's just that we prefer the names by which someone is most commonly known, and there are some historical figures, like Michelangelo (often from the Renaissance, no?), who have these sorts of single names. --Larry Sanger 19:32, 1 November 2007 (CDT)


No conflict, I was offering support for your action. In fact, I would have moved the article myself, but I didn't know how.Theodore Beale 05:07, 2 November 2007 (CDT)