Talk:Magnetic constant: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Joe Quick m (subpages) |
imported>John R. Brews (→Gaussian units: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
This comes from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_constant. I wrote it. I do not know in what variety of english (probably: [[Broken English]]). /[[User:Pieter Kuiper|Pieter Kuiper]] 19:19, 28 October 2007 (CDT) | This comes from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_constant. I wrote it. I do not know in what variety of english (probably: [[Broken English]]). /[[User:Pieter Kuiper|Pieter Kuiper]] 19:19, 28 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
== Gaussian units == | |||
The article states that in Gaussian units μ<sub>0</sub> and ε<sub>0</sub> do not enter the theory. I find this statement a bit lacking, because it doesn't say what "theory" we are talking about. I'd guess that it would be preferable to say that μ<sub>0</sub> and ε<sub>0</sub> play no role when Gaussian units are employed. I've changed the text to read this way. [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 13:23, 29 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:23, 29 November 2010
This comes from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_constant. I wrote it. I do not know in what variety of english (probably: Broken English). /Pieter Kuiper 19:19, 28 October 2007 (CDT)
Gaussian units
The article states that in Gaussian units μ0 and ε0 do not enter the theory. I find this statement a bit lacking, because it doesn't say what "theory" we are talking about. I'd guess that it would be preferable to say that μ0 and ε0 play no role when Gaussian units are employed. I've changed the text to read this way. John R. Brews 13:23, 29 November 2010 (UTC)