File talk:Coat of Arms of Angola.gif: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Kjetil Ree
(== Copyright status ==)
 
imported>Eddie Ortiz Nieves
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


The source says that their images “can be freely used on other web sites or any media for any purposes”. Our copyright tag says that anyone can “make derivative and commercial works”. One may argue that they allow commercial use, but it is in my opinion unreasonable to claim based upon that statement that they allow the creation and distribution of derivative works. The image needs a new license tag. --[[User:Kjetil Ree|Kjetil Ree]] 18:38, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
The source says that their images “can be freely used on other web sites or any media for any purposes”. Our copyright tag says that anyone can “make derivative and commercial works”. One may argue that they allow commercial use, but it is in my opinion unreasonable to claim based upon that statement that they allow the creation and distribution of derivative works. The image needs a new license tag. --[[User:Kjetil Ree|Kjetil Ree]] 18:38, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
:"''For any purposes''" is not very open to interpretation, IMO. But, I'd be happy to create a new template specially for usage in images like this one, as is done at the Wikimedia Commons (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Vector-Images.com). --[[User:Eddie Ortiz Nieves|Eddie Ortiz Nieves]] 18:48, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
::Wait, read [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Vector-Images.com#Permission this]. They allow commercial use of the images. --[[User:Eddie Ortiz Nieves|Eddie Ortiz Nieves]] 18:53, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
:::Ok, but it is still unclear if they allow derivative works. Maybe we could create a template that says something like “this raster image can be freely used on other web sites or any media with quote to Vector-Images.com”. If it is unclear if they allow derivatives, we shouldn't claim that they do. --[[User:Kjetil Ree|Kjetil Ree]] 19:00, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
::::Great! I'll do that now. --[[User:Eddie Ortiz Nieves|Eddie Ortiz Nieves]] 19:14, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
:::::Let's do one generic: {{Tl|Attribution-noderivas}}.  [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 19:18, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
::::::[http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Template:Attribution-noderivas&oldid=100196253 Done] :-) --[[User:Eddie Ortiz Nieves|Eddie Ortiz Nieves]] 22:25, 27 October 2007 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 21:25, 27 October 2007

Copyright status

The source says that their images “can be freely used on other web sites or any media for any purposes”. Our copyright tag says that anyone can “make derivative and commercial works”. One may argue that they allow commercial use, but it is in my opinion unreasonable to claim based upon that statement that they allow the creation and distribution of derivative works. The image needs a new license tag. --Kjetil Ree 18:38, 27 October 2007 (CDT)

"For any purposes" is not very open to interpretation, IMO. But, I'd be happy to create a new template specially for usage in images like this one, as is done at the Wikimedia Commons (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Vector-Images.com). --Eddie Ortiz Nieves 18:48, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
Wait, read this. They allow commercial use of the images. --Eddie Ortiz Nieves 18:53, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
Ok, but it is still unclear if they allow derivative works. Maybe we could create a template that says something like “this raster image can be freely used on other web sites or any media with quote to Vector-Images.com”. If it is unclear if they allow derivatives, we shouldn't claim that they do. --Kjetil Ree 19:00, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
Great! I'll do that now. --Eddie Ortiz Nieves 19:14, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
Let's do one generic: {{Attribution-noderivas}}. Stephen Ewen 19:18, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
Done :-) --Eddie Ortiz Nieves 22:25, 27 October 2007 (CDT)