Coronary heart disease: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Robert Badgett
(resolving ref errs)
 
(66 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
 
{{TOC|right}}
'''Coronary heart disease''' (CHD), also called '''coronary artery disease''' (CAD), is caused by abnormalities the arteries that supply the heart with blood. Those arteries are called the [[coronary artery|coronary arteries]] and the usual cause of coronary artery disease is [[athersosclerosis]]. Atherosclerosis is a degenerative disease of the arterial walls, in which the normal elastic walls of the arteries become thickened and replaced with deposits of fatty material, including [[cholesterol]]. As the walls of the affected arteries thicken, the hollow lumen at the center of each, that conduit through which oxygen enriched blood normally pulses, becomes narrower and, eventually, the flow of blood within it is decreased. With narrowing of the artery's lumen and reduced flow comes the risk of sudden occlusion of the artery, especially if the lining is abnormally roughened by deposits of irregular plaques of minerals and fats.
'''Coronary heart disease''' (CHD), also called '''coronary artery disease''' (CAD), is a [[vascular disease]] caused by abnormalities the arteries that supply the heart with blood (called the [[coronary artery|coronary arteries]]). The usual cause of coronary heart disease is [[atherosclerosis]].


==Etiology/cause==
==Etiology/cause==
The cause and manifestation of coronary heart disease is multifactorial. About 3/4 of the risk of coronary heart disease is due to three risk factors: [[hypercholesterolemia]] (total cholesterol > 182 mg/dL [4.71 mmol/L]), [[hypertension]] (diastolic blood pressure > 90 mm Hg), and cigarette smoking.<ref name="pmid11732929">{{cite journal |author=Magnus P, Beaglehole R |title=The real contribution of the major risk factors to the coronary epidemics: time to end the "only-50%" myth |journal=Arch. Intern. Med. |volume=161 |issue=22 |pages=2657–60 |year=2001 |pmid=11732929 |doi= |url=http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=11732929 |issn=}}</ref>
The cause and manifestation of coronary heart disease is multifactorial. About 3/4 of the risk of coronary heart disease is due to three risk factors: [[hypercholesterolemia]] (total cholesterol > 182 mg/dL [4.71 mmol/L]), [[hypertension]] (diastolic blood pressure > 90 mm Hg), and cigarette smoking.<ref name="pmid11732929">{{cite journal |author=Magnus P, Beaglehole R |title=The real contribution of the major risk factors to the coronary epidemics: time to end the "only-50%" myth |journal=Arch. Intern. Med. |volume=161 |issue=22 |pages=2657–60 |year=2001 |pmid=11732929 |doi= |url=http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=11732929 |issn=}}</ref>


Inflammation may underlay the association between elevated [[C-reactive protein]] levels and coronary heart disease.
===Atherosclerosis===
{{main|Atherosclerosis}}
Atherosclerosis is a degenerative disease of the arterial walls, in which the normal elastic walls of the arteries become thickened and replaced with deposits of fatty material, including [[cholesterol]]. As the walls of the affected arteries thicken, the hollow lumen at the center of each, that conduit through which oxygen enriched blood normally pulses, becomes narrower and, eventually, the flow of blood within it is decreased. With narrowing of the artery's lumen and reduced flow comes the risk of sudden occlusion of the artery, especially if the lining is abnormally roughened by deposits of irregular plaques of minerals and fats. However, the site of current stenoses does not predict the site of a subsequent myocardial infarction.<ref name="pmid3180375">{{cite journal| author=Little WC, Constantinescu M, Applegate RJ, Kutcher MA, Burrows MT, Kahl FR et al.| title=Can coronary angiography predict the site of a subsequent myocardial infarction in patients with mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease? | journal=Circulation | year= 1988 | volume= 78 | issue= 5 Pt 1 | pages= 1157-66 | pmid=3180375 | doi= | pmc= | url= }} </ref>
 
About 10% of patients with chronic [[angina]] have atherosclerosis of the left main [[coronary artery]].<ref name="pmid3141736">{{cite journal |author=Lee TH, Fukui T, Weinstein MC, Tosteson AN, Goldman L |title=Cost-effectiveness of screening strategies for left main coronary artery disease in patients with stable angina |journal=Med Decis Making |volume=8 |issue=4 |pages=268–78 |year=1988 |pmid=3141736 |doi= |url=http://mdm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/4/268 |issn=}}</ref><ref name="pmid7249303">{{cite journal |author=Chaitman BR, Bourassa MG, Davis K, ''et al'' |title=Angiographic prevalence of high-risk coronary artery disease in patient subsets (CASS) |journal=Circulation |volume=64 |issue=2 |pages=360–7 |year=1981 |month=August |pmid=7249303 |doi= |url=http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/reprint/64/2/360 |issn=}}</ref> In males over age 70 with definite angina, almost 50% have obstruction of the left main [[coronary artery]].<ref name="pmid7249303"/>
 
The extent of coronary obstructions can be quantified with:
* [http://www.syntaxscore.com/ SYNTAX score]<ref name="pmid17437730">{{cite journal |author=Valgimigli M, Serruys PW, Tsuchida K, ''et al''  |title=Cyphering the complexity of coronary artery disease using the  syntax score to predict clinical outcome in patients with three-vessel  lumen obstruction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention  |journal=Am. J. Cardiol. |volume=99 |issue=8 |pages=1072–81 |year=2007  |month=April |pmid=17437730 |doi=10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.11.062 |url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0002-9149(07)00072-0 |issn=}}</ref>
* Duke Coronary Artery Disease Index<ref name="pmid8181125">{{cite journal |author=Mark DB, Nelson CL, Califf RM, ''et al'' |title=Continuing evolution of therapy for coronary artery disease. Initial results from the era of coronary angioplasty |journal=Circulation |volume=89 |issue=5 |pages=2015–25 |year=1994 |month=May |pmid=8181125 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref>
 
====Plaque rupture and inflammation====
Rupture of [[atherosclerosis|atherosclerotic]] plaques may cause [[acute coronary syndrome]]. Inflammation may underlay the association between elevated [[C-reactive protein]] levels and coronary heart disease.


The role of emotional stress was supported in a study of the incidence of coronary events in the [[Munich]] area during the 2006 World Cup Football ([[soccer]]) championship.<ref name="pmid18234752">{{cite journal |author=Wilbert-Lampen U, Leistner D, Greven S, ''et al'' |title=Cardiovascular events during World Cup soccer |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=358 |issue=5 |pages=475–83 |year=2008 |pmid=18234752 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa0707427 |issn=}}</ref> The incidence of coronary events was higher during the match, especially for people who had pre-existing coronary disease.
Surprisingly, more fatal ruptures occur on plaques that are not severely stenosed.<ref name="pmid8790027">{{cite journal| author=Mann JM, Davies MJ| title=Vulnerable plaque. Relation of characteristics to degree of stenosis in human coronary arteries. | journal=Circulation | year= 1996 | volume= 94 | issue= 5 | pages= 928-31 | pmid=8790027 | doi= | pmc= | url= }} </ref><ref name="pmid15547008">{{cite journal| author=Kolodgie FD, Virmani R, Burke AP, Farb A, Weber DK, Kutys R et al.| title=Pathologic assessment of the vulnerable human coronary plaque. | journal=Heart | year= 2004 | volume= 90 | issue= 12 | pages= 1385-91 | pmid=15547008 | doi=10.1136/hrt.2004.041798 | pmc=PMC1768577 | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=15547008  }} </ref><ref name="pmid10807742">{{cite journal| author=Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, Schwartz SM| title=Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. | journal=Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol | year= 2000 | volume= 20 | issue= 5 | pages= 1262-75 | pmid=10807742 | doi= | pmc= | url= }} </ref>


===Atherosclerotic obstruction===
[[Periodontal disease]] may contribute to this inflammation.<ref name="pmid18807098">{{cite journal |author=Humphrey LL, Fu R, Buckley DI, Freeman M, Helfand M |title=Periodontal disease and coronary heart disease incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis |journal=J Gen Intern Med |volume=23 |issue=12 |pages=2079–86 |year=2008 |month=December |pmid=18807098 |doi=10.1007/s11606-008-0787-6 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0787-6 |issn=}}</ref><ref name="pmid20508025">{{cite journal| author=de Oliveira C, Watt R, Hamer M| title=Toothbrushing, inflammation, and risk of cardiovascular disease: results from Scottish Health Survey. | journal=BMJ | year= 2010 | volume= 340 | issue= | pages= c2451 | pmid=20508025
About 10% of patients with chronic [[angina]] have left main disease.<ref name="pmid3141736">{{cite journal |author=Lee TH, Fukui T, Weinstein MC, Tosteson AN, Goldman L |title=Cost-effectiveness of screening strategies for left main coronary artery disease in patients with stable angina |journal=Med Decis Making |volume=8 |issue=4 |pages=268–78 |year=1988 |pmid=3141736 |doi= |url=http://mdm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/4/268 |issn=}}</ref><ref name="pmid7249303">{{cite journal |author=Chaitman BR, Bourassa MG, Davis K, ''et al'' |title=Angiographic prevalence of high-risk coronary artery disease in patient subsets (CASS) |journal=Circulation |volume=64 |issue=2 |pages=360–7 |year=1981 |month=August |pmid=7249303 |doi= |url=http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/reprint/64/2/360 |issn=}}</ref> In males over age 70 with definite angina, almost 50% have obstruction of the left main [[coronary artery]].<ref name="pmid7249303"/> The extent of coronary obstructions can be quantified with the Duke Coronary Artery Disease Index.<ref name="pmid8181125">{{cite journal |author=Mark DB, Nelson CL, Califf RM, ''et al'' |title=Continuing evolution of therapy for coronary artery disease. Initial results from the era of coronary angioplasty |journal=Circulation |volume=89 |issue=5 |pages=2015–25 |year=1994 |month=May |pmid=8181125 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref>
| url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=clinical.uthscsa.edu/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=20508025 | doi=10.1136/bmj.c2451 }} </ref> Poor oral hygiene is associated with elevated [[C-reactive protein]] and [[fibrinogen]].<ref name="pmid20508025"/>


===Coronary vasospasm===
===Coronary vasospasm===
Line 18: Line 29:
===Syndrome X===
===Syndrome X===
Cardiac syndrome X is the presence of typical [[angina]], abnormal exercise-test results, and normal coronary arteries (including no vasospasm).<ref name="pmid12075055">{{cite journal |author=Panting JR, Gatehouse PD, Yang GZ, ''et al'' |title=Abnormal subendocardial perfusion in cardiac syndrome X detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=346 |issue=25 |pages=1948–53 |year=2002 |month=June |pmid=12075055 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa012369 |url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=short&pmid=12075055&promo=ONFLNS19 |issn=}}</ref> Syndrome X may be caused by subendocardial hypoperfusion that can be demonstrated by cardiovascular [[magnetic resonance imaging]] during the administration of [[adenosine]].<ref name="pmid12075055"/>
Cardiac syndrome X is the presence of typical [[angina]], abnormal exercise-test results, and normal coronary arteries (including no vasospasm).<ref name="pmid12075055">{{cite journal |author=Panting JR, Gatehouse PD, Yang GZ, ''et al'' |title=Abnormal subendocardial perfusion in cardiac syndrome X detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=346 |issue=25 |pages=1948–53 |year=2002 |month=June |pmid=12075055 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa012369 |url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=short&pmid=12075055&promo=ONFLNS19 |issn=}}</ref> Syndrome X may be caused by subendocardial hypoperfusion that can be demonstrated by cardiovascular [[magnetic resonance imaging]] during the administration of [[adenosine]].<ref name="pmid12075055"/>
===Hyperuricemia===
{{main|Hyperuricemia}}
[[Hyperuricemia]] has been proposed as contributing to coronary heart disease.


==Diagnosis==
==Diagnosis==
Line 23: Line 38:
Angina pectoris, or simply angina, is the chest pain due to coronary heart disease; however, most patients do not report angina.<ref name="pmid18625923">{{cite journal |author=Gehi AK, Ali S, Na B, Schiller NB, Whooley MA |title=Inducible ischemia and the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events in outpatients with stable coronary heart disease: the heart and soul study |journal=Arch. Intern. Med. |volume=168 |issue=13 |pages=1423–8 |year=2008 |month=July |pmid=18625923 |doi=10.1001/archinte.168.13.1423 |url= |issn=}}</ref> The nature of the chest pain affects the probability of underlying coronary disease.<ref name="pmid16304077">{{cite journal |author=Swap CJ, Nagurney JT |title=Value and limitations of chest pain history in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes |journal=JAMA |volume=294 |issue=20 |pages=2623–9 |year=2005 |pmid=16304077 |doi=10.1001/jama.294.20.2623 |issn=}}</ref>
Angina pectoris, or simply angina, is the chest pain due to coronary heart disease; however, most patients do not report angina.<ref name="pmid18625923">{{cite journal |author=Gehi AK, Ali S, Na B, Schiller NB, Whooley MA |title=Inducible ischemia and the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events in outpatients with stable coronary heart disease: the heart and soul study |journal=Arch. Intern. Med. |volume=168 |issue=13 |pages=1423–8 |year=2008 |month=July |pmid=18625923 |doi=10.1001/archinte.168.13.1423 |url= |issn=}}</ref> The nature of the chest pain affects the probability of underlying coronary disease.<ref name="pmid16304077">{{cite journal |author=Swap CJ, Nagurney JT |title=Value and limitations of chest pain history in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes |journal=JAMA |volume=294 |issue=20 |pages=2623–9 |year=2005 |pmid=16304077 |doi=10.1001/jama.294.20.2623 |issn=}}</ref>


The [http://www.mssm.edu/medicine/general-medicine/ebm/CPR/CAD.html Pryor nomogram], a [[clinical prediction rule]], can help diagnose patients with suspected chest pain in a non emergent setting.<ref name="pmid8416322">{{cite journal |author=Pryor DB, Shaw L, McCants CB, ''et al'' |title=Value of the history and physical in identifying patients at increased risk for coronary artery disease |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=118 |issue=2 |pages=81–90 |year=1993 |pmid=8416322 |doi=|url=http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/118/2/81}} [http://www.mssm.edu/medicine/general-medicine/ebm/CPR/CAD.html Online calculator]</ref><ref name="pmid6638047">{{cite journal |author=Pryor DB, Harrell FE, Lee KL, Califf RM, Rosati RA |title=Estimating the likelihood of significant coronary artery disease |journal=Am. J. Med. |volume=75 |issue=5 |pages=771–80 |year=1983 |pmid=6638047 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref>
The likeilood of coronary heart disease is associated with the number of risk factors and the nature of chest pain.<ref name="pmid440357">{{cite journal| author=Diamond GA, Forrester JS| title=Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. | journal=N Engl J Med | year= 1979 | volume= 300 | issue= 24 | pages= 1350-8 | pmid=440357 | doi=10.1056/NEJM197906143002402 }} </ref><ref name="pmid449990">{{cite journal| author=Weiner DA, Ryan TJ, McCabe CH, Kennedy JW, Schloss M, Tristani F et al.| title=Exercise stress testing. Correlations among history of angina, ST-segment response and prevalence of coronary-artery disease in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). | journal=N Engl J Med | year= 1979 | volume= 301 | issue= 5 | pages= 230-5 | pmid=449990 | doi=10.1056/NEJM197908023010502 }} </ref> A [http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM197906143002402#t=article table of probabilities] is available online.
 
The Pryor nomogram, a [[clinical prediction rule]], can help diagnose patients with suspected chest pain in a non emergent setting.<ref name="pmid8416322">{{cite journal |author=Pryor DB, Shaw L, McCants CB, ''et al'' |title=Value of the history and physical in identifying patients at increased risk for coronary artery disease |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=118 |issue=2 |pages=81–90 |year=1993 |pmid=8416322 |doi=|url=http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/118/2/81}} [http://www.mssm.edu/medicine/general-medicine/ebm/CPR/CAD.html Online calculator]</ref><ref name="pmid6638047">{{cite journal |author=Pryor DB, Harrell FE, Lee KL, Califf RM, Rosati RA |title=Estimating the likelihood of significant coronary artery disease |journal=Am. J. Med. |volume=75 |issue=5 |pages=771–80 |year=1983 |pmid=6638047 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref>


===Cardiac stress test===
===Cardiac stress test===
{{main|Stress test}}
{{main|Stress test}}
{| class="wikitable" align="right"
|+Sensitivity and specificity of cardiac stress tests<ref name="pmid10357690">{{cite journal |author=Garber AM, Solomon NA |title=Cost-effectiveness of alternative test strategies for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=130 |issue=9 |pages=719–28 |year=1999 |month=May |pmid=10357690 |doi= |url=http://www.annals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=10357690 |issn=}}</ref>
|-
! &nbsp;
! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]
! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]
|-
| Exercise electrocardiography
| 68%
| 77%
|-
| Stress echocardiography
| 76%
| 88%
|-
| Myocardial perfusion imaging<br/>thallium planar
| 79%
| 73%
|-
| Myocardial perfusion imaging<br/>single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)
| 88%
| 77%
|-
| [[Positron emission tomography]] (PET),
| 68%
| 77%
|}
The [[sensitivity and specificity]] of the various cardiac stress tests have been summarized.<ref name="pmid10357690">{{cite journal |author=Garber AM, Solomon NA |title=Cost-effectiveness of alternative test strategies for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=130 |issue=9 |pages=719–28 |year=1999 |month=May |pmid=10357690 |doi= |url=http://www.annals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=10357690 |issn=}}</ref>
====Exercise treadmill test====
====Exercise treadmill test====
The [[exercise test|exercise treadmill test]] (ETT) can help diagnose and prognose patients with suspected CHD. The likelihood of a positive treadmill test depends on the severity of the underlying coronary disease.<ref name="pmid3141736">{{cite journal |author=Lee TH, Fukui T, Weinstein MC, Tosteson AN, Goldman L |title=Cost-effectiveness of screening strategies for left main coronary artery disease in patients with stable angina |journal=Med Decis Making |volume=8 |issue=4 |pages=268–78 |year=1988 |pmid=3141736 |doi= |url=http://mdm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/4/268 |issn=}}</ref> For example, 87% of patients with obstruction of the left main coronary artery will have a positive treatmill test, whereas only 57% of patients with  obstructions of one or two of the other coronaries will have a positive treadmill test.
The [[exercise test|exercise treadmill test]] (ETT) can help diagnose and prognose patients with suspected CHD. The likelihood of a positive treadmill test depends on the severity of the underlying coronary disease.<ref name="pmid3141736">{{cite journal |author=Lee TH, Fukui T, Weinstein MC, Tosteson AN, Goldman L |title=Cost-effectiveness of screening strategies for left main coronary artery disease in patients with stable angina |journal=Med Decis Making |volume=8 |issue=4 |pages=268–78 |year=1988 |pmid=3141736 |doi= |url=http://mdm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/4/268 |issn=}}</ref> For example, 87% of patients with obstruction of the left main coronary artery will have a positive treatmill test, whereas only 57% of patients with  obstructions of one or two of the other coronaries will have a positive treadmill test. The treadmill can help predict the location of coronary stenoses.<ref name="pmid3789578">{{cite journal |author=Mark DB, Hlatky MA, Lee KL, Harrell FE, Califf RM, Pryor DB |title=Localizing coronary artery obstructions with the exercise treadmill test |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=106 |issue=1 |pages=53–5 |year=1987 |month=January |pmid=3789578 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref>


====Stress myocardial perfusion imaging====
====Stress myocardial perfusion imaging====
Line 36: Line 83:
====Stress ventriculography====
====Stress ventriculography====


===X-ray computed tomography===
===Diagnostic imaging===
There are two types of [[computed tomography]] used for noninvasive coronary arteriography.
Several types of imaging, ranging from noninvasive to minimally invasive to invasive, can assess the degree of CHD. They include techniques using radiation transmitted through the body, imaging of radioisotopes in the body, or imaging using other mechanisms such as MRI and ultrasonography.


====Electron beam computed tomography====
Most are performed before and after cardiac stress, which may be induced either by controlled exercise or pharmacologically, with drugs that stimulate the heart.
====Techniques====
=====Electron beam computed tomography=====
Electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) is also called ultrafast CT.
Electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) is also called ultrafast CT.


====Cardiac computed tomographic angiography====
=====Cardiac computed tomographic angiography=====
{{main|Computed tomographic cardiac angiography}}
{{main|Computed tomographic cardiac angiography}}
Computed tomographic cardiac angiography (CT cardiac angiography) uses multidetector [[spiral computed tomography]].<ref name="pmid18691486">{{cite journal |author=Stein PD, Yaekoub AY, Matta F, Sostman HD |title=64-slice CT for diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review |journal=The American journal of medicine |volume=121 |issue=8 |pages=715–25 |year=2008 |month=August |pmid=18691486 |doi=10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.02.039 |url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0002-9343(08)00298-2 |issn=}}</ref><ref name="pmid18669550">{{cite journal |author=Mowatt G, Cook JA, Hillis GS, ''et al'' |title=64-slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis |journal=Heart |volume= |issue= |pages= |year=2008 |month=July |pmid=18669550 |doi=10.1136/hrt.2008.145292 |url=http://heart.bmj.com/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=18669550 |issn=}}</ref><ref name="pmid17996512">{{cite journal |author=Rubinshtein R, Halon DA, Gaspar T, ''et al'' |title=Impact of 64-slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography on clinical decision-making in emergency department patients with chest pain of possible myocardial ischemic origin |journal=Am. J. Cardiol. |volume=100 |issue=10 |pages=1522–6 |year=2007 |month=November |pmid=17996512 |doi=10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.06.052 |url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0002-9149(07)01506-8 |issn=}}</ref> The physiologic significance of obstructions estimated to be 60% to 80% is difficult to predict.<ref name="pmid18344444">{{cite journal |author=Sato A, Hiroe M, Tamura M, ''et al'' |title=Quantitative measures of coronary stenosis severity by 64-Slice CT angiography and relation to physiologic significance of perfusion in nonobese patients: comparison with stress myocardial perfusion imaging |journal=J. Nucl. Med. |volume=49 |issue=4 |pages=564–72 |year=2008 |month=April |pmid=18344444 |doi=10.2967/jnumed.107.042481 |url=http://jnm.snmjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=18344444 |issn=}}</ref>
[[Computed tomographic cardiac angiography]] has accuracy of:<ref name="pmid20124233">{{cite journal| author=Schuetz GM, Zacharopoulou NM, Schlattmann P, Dewey M| title=Meta-analysis: noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. | journal=Ann Intern Med | year= 2010 | volume= 152 | issue= 3 | pages= 167-77 | pmid=20124233
| url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=clinical.uthscsa.edu/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=20124233 | doi=10.1059/0003-4819-152-3-201002020-00008 }} </ref>
* [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 97.2% (95% [[Confidence interval|CI]], 96.2% to 98.0%)
* [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]  87.4% ([[Confidence interval|CI]], 84.5% to 89.8%)
=====Single-Photon Emission-Computed Tomography=====
=====Stress echocardiography=====
Ultrasound-based echocardiography has long been a preferred method for assessing valvular function. cardiac output and wall movement, but, especially with the use of ultrasound-appropriate contrast media, allows better vascular visualization. 
=====Cardiac catheterization and angiography=====
Indications for renal arteriography at the time of coronary arteriography have been [http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/114/17/1892/T1.expansion.html summarized].<ref name="pmid17030686">{{cite journal| author=White CJ, Jaff MR, Haskal ZJ, Jones DJ, Olin JW, Rocha-Singh KJ et al.| title=Indications for renal arteriography at the time of coronary arteriography: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Councils on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention and on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease. | journal=Circulation | year= 2006 | volume= 114 | issue= 17 | pages= 1892-5 | pmid=17030686 | doi=10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.178777 | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=17030686  }} </ref>


====Coronary calcium score====
=====Magnetic resonance imaging=====
Both types of [[computed tomography]], electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) and multidetector [[spiral computed tomography]], can measure the amount of [[calcium]] in the walls of the [[coronary artery|coronary arteries]] in order to diagnose coronary heart diease.
[[Magnetic resonance imaging]] has accuracy of:<ref name="pmid20124233">{{cite journal| author=Schuetz GM, Zacharopoulou NM, Schlattmann P, Dewey M| title=Meta-analysis: noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. | journal=Ann Intern Med | year= 2010 | volume= 152 | issue= 3 | pages= 167-77 | pmid=20124233
| url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=clinical.uthscsa.edu/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=20124233 | doi=10.1059/0003-4819-152-3-201002020-00008 }} </ref>
* [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 87.1% (CI, 83.0% to 90.3%)
* [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 70.3% (CI, 58.8% to 79.7%)
 
====Evaluation: Coronary calcium score====
Both types of [[computed tomography]], electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) and multidetector [[spiral computed tomography]], can measure the amount of [[calcium]] in the walls of the [[coronary artery|coronary arteries]] in order to diagnose coronary heart disease.
 
[[Clinical practice guideline]]s conflict regarding the role of the coronary calcium score. The [[U.S. Preventive Services Task Force]]<ref name="pmid19805772">{{cite journal| author=Helfand M, Buckley DI, Freeman M, Fu R, Rogers K, Fleming C et al.| title=Emerging risk factors for coronary heart disease: a summary of systematic reviews conducted for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. | journal=Ann Intern Med | year= 2009 | volume= 151 | issue= 7 | pages= 496-507 | pmid=19805772
| url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=clinical.uthscsa.edu/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=19805772 }} </ref> does not endorse using the score while the [[American Heart Association]]<ref name="pmid17220398">{{cite journal| author=Greenland P, Bonow RO, Brundage BH, Budoff MJ, Eisenberg MJ, Grundy SM et al.| title=ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography). | journal=Circulation | year= 2007 | volume= 115 | issue= 3 | pages= 402-26 | pmid=17220398
| url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=clinical.uthscsa.edu/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=17220398 | doi=10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA..107.181425 }} </ref> does endorse the score. The Task Force that the best study was still compromised by using volunteers rather than being community based.<ref name="pmid14722147">{{cite journal| author=Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP, Doherty TM, Detrano RC| title=Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. | journal=JAMA | year= 2004 | volume= 291 | issue= 2 | pages= 210-5 | pmid=14722147
| url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=clinical.uthscsa.edu/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=14722147 | doi=10.1001/jama.291.2.210 }} </ref>


==Treatment==
==Treatment==
===Medications===
===Medications===
[[Ranolazine]] may increased exercise capacity and reduce symptoms<ref>Chaitman BR et al. Effects of ranolazine with atenolol, amlodipine, or diltiazem on exercise tolerance and angina frequency in patients with severe chronic angina: a randomized controlled trial. Combination Assessment of Ranolazine In Stable Angina (CARISA) Investigators. JAMA. 2004 Jan 21;291(3):309-16. PMID: 14734593</ref> but not reduce cardiac events.<ref>Morrow et al; MERLIN-TIMI 36 Trial Investigators. Effects of ranolazine on recurrent cardiovascular events in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: the MERLIN-TIMI 36 randomized trial. JAMA. 2007 Apr 25;297(16):1775-83. PMID: 17456819</ref>
====Adrenergic beta-antagonists====
[[Adrenergic beta-antagonist]]s were first shown to be effective in 1981.<ref name="pmid7010157">{{cite journal |author= |title=Timolol-induced reduction in mortality and reinfarction in patients surviving acute myocardial infarction |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=304 |issue=14 |pages=801–7 |year=1981 |month=April |pmid=7010157 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref>
===Invasive treatments===
===Invasive treatments===
{{main|myocardial revascularization}}
{{main|myocardial revascularization}}
Patient who have a [[left ventricular ejection fraction]] above 50%, no angina or their angina is controlled with medicines, do not benefit from either [[percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty]] (PCI)<ref name="pmid17387127">{{cite journal |author=Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, ''et al'' |title=Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=356 |issue=15 |pages=1503–16 |year=2007 |month=April |pmid=17387127 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa070829 |url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=short&pmid=17387127&promo=ONFLNS19 |issn=|quote=This is the COURAGE [[randomized controlled trial]].}}</ref> or from [[coronary artery bypass grafting]] surgery<ref name="pmid6608052">{{cite journal |author= |title=Myocardial infarction and mortality in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS) randomized trial |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=310 |issue=12 |pages=750–8 |year=1984 |month=March |pmid=6608052 |doi= |url= |issn=|quote=This is the CASS [[randomized controlled trial]].}}</ref>.
Patient who have a [[left ventricular ejection fraction]] above 50%, no angina or their angina is controlled with medicines, do not benefit from either [[percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty]] (PCI)<ref name="pmid20231568">{{cite journal| author=Wijeysundera HC, Nallamothu BK, Krumholz HM, Tu JV, Ko DT| title=Meta-analysis: effects of percutaneous coronary intervention versus medical therapy on angina relief. | journal=Ann Intern Med | year= 2010 | volume= 152 | issue= 6 | pages= 370-9 | pmid=20231568
| url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=clinical.uthscsa.edu/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=20231568 | doi=10.1059/0003-4819-152-6-201003160-00007 }} </ref> or from [[coronary artery bypass]] surgery<ref name="pmid6608052">{{cite journal |author= |title=Myocardial infarction and mortality in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS) randomized trial |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=310 |issue=12 |pages=750–8 |year=1984 |month=March |pmid=6608052 |doi= |url= |issn=|quote=This is the CASS [[randomized controlled trial]].}}</ref>.


Regarding patients who must undergo invasive treatment, a [[systematic review]] comparing percutaneous coronary interventions and [[coronary artery bypass grafting]] (CABG) surgery found that CABG was more effective but was more likely to be complicated by [[stroke]].<ref name="pmid-17938385">{{cite journal |author=Bravata DM, Gienger AL, McDonald KM, ''et al'' |title=Systematic Review: The Comparative Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions and Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery |journal=Ann Intern Med |volume= |issue= |pages= |year=2007 |pmid=17938385 |doi=}}</ref>
{| class="wikitable" align="right"
 
|+ Coronary artery bypass versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty<ref name="pmid-17938385">{{cite journal |author=Bravata DM, Gienger AL, McDonald KM, ''et al'' |title=Systematic Review: The Comparative Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions and Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery |journal=Ann Intern Med |volume= |issue= |pages= |year=2007 |pmid=17938385 |doi=|url=http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/147/10/703}}</ref>
====Percutaneous cardiac intervention====
! rowspan="2"|&nbsp;!! colspan="2"|Outcomes at 5 years||rowspan="2"| Procedural related [[stroke]]
Patient who have a stable angina and [[left ventricular ejection fraction]] above 35% do not reduce mortality from [[percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty]] (PCI)<ref name="pmid17387127">{{cite journal |author=Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, ''et al'' |title=Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=356 |issue=15 |pages=1503–16 |year=2007 |month=April |pmid=17387127 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa070829 |url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=short&pmid=17387127&promo=ONFLNS19 |issn=|quote=This is the COURAGE [[randomized controlled trial]].}}</ref> although there is some reduction in angina for the first three years after procedure<ref name="pmid18703470">{{cite journal |author=Weintraub WS, Spertus JA, Kolm P, ''et al'' |title=Effect of PCI on quality of life in patients with stable coronary disease |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=359 |issue=7 |pages=677–87 |year=2008 |month=August |pmid=18703470 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa072771 |url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/359/7/677 |issn=}} (see [http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/359/7/677/T3 Table 3] in the article)</ref>.
 
Patients are more likely to benefit from PCI when [[clinical practice guidelines]] are followed.<ref name="pmid16267252">{{cite journal |author=Anderson HV, Shaw RE, Brindis RG, ''et al'' |title=Relationship between procedure indications and outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions by American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force Guidelines |journal=Circulation |volume=112 |issue=18 |pages=2786–91 |year=2005 |month=November |pmid=16267252 |doi=10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.553727 |url=http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=16267252 |issn=}}</ref>
 
====Coronary artery bypass graftiing====
{| class="wikitable" align="center"
|+ Major randomized controlled trials of surgery for chronic stable angina
! Trial || results
|-
|-
|Veterans Administration cooperative study<br>1977<br>686 patients<ref name="pmid331107">{{cite journal |author=Murphy ML, Hultgren HN, Detre K, Thomsen J, Takaro T |title=Treatment of chronic stable angina. A preliminary report of survival data of the randomized Veterans Administration cooperative study |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=297 |issue=12 |pages=621–7 |year=1977 |month=September |pmid=331107 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref> || 3 year survival was 87% of the medical group and 88% of the surgical group. No significant difference.
! Relief of angina!!Repeat revascularization
|-
|-
| Coronary Artery Surgery Study<br>(CASS)<br>1984<br>780 patients<ref name="pmid6608052">{{cite journal |author= |title=Myocardial infarction and mortality in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS) randomized trial |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=310 |issue=12 |pages=750–8 |year=1984 |month=March |pmid=6608052 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref> || The 5 year survival 92% with medical therapy and 95% with surgery (not significant). "The likelihood of nonfatal Q-wave myocardial infarction was 11 and 14 per cent, respectively (not significant). The five-year probability of remaining alive and free of infarction was 82 per cent in the patients assigned to medical therapy and 83 per cent in the patients assigned to surgery (not significant)."
| CABG||align="center"| 84%||align="center"|10%||align="center"|1.2%
|-
|-
| European Coronary Surgery Study<br>1988<br>767 patients<ref name="pmid3260659">{{cite journal |author=Varnauskas E |title=Twelve-year follow-up of survival in the randomized European Coronary Surgery Study |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=319 |issue=6 |pages=332–7 |year=1988 |month=August |pmid=3260659 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref> || 5 year survival was 92% with surgery and 83% with medical therapy.
| PTCA||align="center"|79%||align="center"|With stents 40% <br/>Without stents 46%||align="center"|0.6%
|-
|-
! Pooled results<ref name="pmid7914958">{{cite journal |author=Yusuf S, Zucker D, Peduzzi P, ''et al'' |title=Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration |journal=Lancet |volume=344 |issue=8922 |pages=563–70 |year=1994 |month=August |pmid=7914958 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref> || Surgery fared better except for patients with one or two vessel disease with neither vessel being the LAD or left main.
| colspan="4"|Abbreviations:<br/>CABG. [[Coronary artery bypass]] grafting<br/>PTCA. [[Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty]]
|}
|}


Patient who have a [[left ventricular ejection fraction]] between 35 and 49 percent benefit from [[coronary artery bypass surgery]] if they have disease of three coronary arteries.<ref name="pmid6608052">{{cite journal |author= |title=Myocardial infarction and mortality in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS) randomized trial |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=310 |issue=12 |pages=750–8 |year=1984 |month=March |pmid=6608052 |doi= |url= |issn=|quote=This is the CASS [[randomized controlled trial]].}}</ref>.
Regarding patients who must undergo invasive treatment, a [[systematic review]] comparing [[percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty]] and [[coronary artery bypass]] grafting (CABG) surgery found that CABG was more effective but was more likely to be complicated by [[stroke]].<ref name="pmid-17938385"/>
 
====Percutaneous cardiac intervention====
{{main|Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty}}
Patient who have a stable angina and [[left ventricular ejection fraction]] above 35% do not reduce mortality from [[percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty]] (PCI)<ref name="pmid17387127">{{cite journal |author=Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, ''et al'' |title=Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=356 |issue=15 |pages=1503–16 |year=2007 |month=April |pmid=17387127 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa070829 |url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=short&pmid=17387127&promo=ONFLNS19 |issn=|quote=This is the COURAGE [[randomized controlled trial]].}}</ref> although there is some reduction in angina for the first one to three years after procedure and few patients received [[stent]]s<ref name="pmid17105759">{{cite journal| author=Hochman JS, Lamas GA, Buller CE, Dzavik V, Reynolds HR, Abramsky SJ et al.| title=Coronary intervention for persistent occlusion after myocardial infarction. | journal=N Engl J Med | year= 2006 | volume= 355 | issue= 23 | pages= 2395-407 | pmid=17105759
| url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=clinical.uthscsa.edu/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=17105759 | doi=10.1056/NEJMoa066139 | pmc=PMC1995554 }} </ref><ref name="pmid18703470">{{cite journal |author=Weintraub WS, Spertus JA, Kolm P, ''et al'' |title=Effect of PCI on quality of life in patients with stable coronary disease |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=359 |issue=7 |pages=677–87 |year=2008 |month=August |pmid=18703470 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa072771 |url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/359/7/677 |issn=}} (see [http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/359/7/677/T3 Table 3] in the article)</ref><ref  name="pmid17387127"/>. The relief from angina, as compared to relief from medical therapy, may be reduced when evidence-based medications are used.<ref name="pmid20231568">{{cite journal| author=Wijeysundera HC, Nallamothu BK, Krumholz HM, Tu JV, Ko DT| title=Meta-analysis: effects of percutaneous coronary intervention versus medical therapy on angina relief. | journal=Ann Intern Med | year= 2010 | volume= 152 | issue= 6 | pages= 370-9 | pmid=20231568
| url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=clinical.uthscsa.edu/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=20231568 | doi=10.1059/0003-4819-152-6-201003160-00007 }} </ref>
 
Patients are more likely to benefit from PCI when [[clinical practice guideline]]s are followed.<ref name="pmid16267252">{{cite journal |author=Anderson HV, Shaw RE, Brindis RG, ''et al'' |title=Relationship between procedure indications and outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions by American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force Guidelines |journal=Circulation |volume=112 |issue=18 |pages=2786–91 |year=2005 |month=November |pmid=16267252 |doi=10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.553727 |url=http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=16267252 |issn=}}</ref>
 
:Stents
[[Meta-analysis|Meta-anlayses]] have found that the rate of late thrombosis was <2% between years 1 and 4.<ref name="pmid17296821">{{cite journal |author=Mauri L, Hsieh WH, Massaro JM, Ho KK, D'Agostino R, Cutlip DE |title=Stent thrombosis in randomized clinical trials of drug-eluting stents |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=356 |issue=10 |pages=1020–9 |year=2007 |month=March |pmid=17296821 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa067731 |url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=short&pmid=17296821&promo=ONFLNS19 |issn=}}</ref><ref name="pmid17296824">{{cite journal |author=Stone GW, Moses JW, Ellis SG, ''et al'' |title=Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=356 |issue=10 |pages=998–1008 |year=2007 |month=March |pmid=17296824 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa067193 |url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=short&pmid=17296824&promo=ONFLNS19 |issn=}}</ref><ref name="pmid17296823">{{cite journal |author=Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Pache J, ''et al'' |title=Analysis of 14 trials comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=356 |issue=10 |pages=1030–9 |year=2007 |month=March |pmid=17296823 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa067484 |url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=short&pmid=17296823&promo=ONFLNS19 |issn=}}</ref>
 
====Coronary artery bypass====
{{main|Coronary artery bypass}}
 
Patient who have a [[left ventricular ejection fraction]] between 35 and 49 percent benefit from [[coronary artery bypass]] if they have disease of three [[coronary artery|coronary arteries]].<ref name="pmid6608052">{{cite journal |author= |title=Myocardial infarction and mortality in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS) randomized trial |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=310 |issue=12 |pages=750–8 |year=1984 |month=March |pmid=6608052 |doi= |url= |issn=|quote=This is the CASS [[randomized controlled trial]].}}</ref>.


==Complications==
==Complications==
Line 87: Line 169:


==Prognosis==
==Prognosis==
===Framingham risk===
: See also: [[Vascular disease#Prognosis]]
The Framingham risk uses clinical risk factors that are combined in an equation developed from the Framingham Heart Study to calculate prognosis. An online calculator is available at http://hp2010.nhlbihin.net/atpiii/calculator.asp.
 
===Coronary calcium score===
===Coronary calcium score===
{| class="wikitable" align="right"
{| class="wikitable" align="right"
Line 116: Line 197:
Both types of [[computed tomography]], electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) and multidetector [[spiral computed tomography]], can measure the amount of [[calcium]] in the walls of the [[coronary artery|coronary arteries]] in order to estimate prognosis. The calcium score improves upon using clinical risk factors for prognosticating. <ref name="pmid18367736">{{cite journal |author=Detrano R, Guerci AD, Carr JJ, ''et al'' |title=Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=358 |issue=13 |pages=1336–45 |year=2008 |month=March |pmid=18367736 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa072100 |url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/358/13/1336 |issn=}}</ref> Using clinical risk factors alone, the area under the [[receiver operating-characteristic curve]] (AUC) was 0.79 while the AUC rose to 0.83 when the calcium score was added. The clinical importance of this rise is not clear.<ref name="pmid18367744">{{cite journal |author=Weintraub WS, Diamond GA |title=Predicting cardiovascular events with coronary calcium scoring |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=358 |issue=13 |pages=1394–6 |year=2008 |month=March |pmid=18367744 |doi=10.1056/NEJMe0800676 |url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=short&pmid=18367744&promo=ONFLNS19 |issn=}}</ref>
Both types of [[computed tomography]], electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) and multidetector [[spiral computed tomography]], can measure the amount of [[calcium]] in the walls of the [[coronary artery|coronary arteries]] in order to estimate prognosis. The calcium score improves upon using clinical risk factors for prognosticating. <ref name="pmid18367736">{{cite journal |author=Detrano R, Guerci AD, Carr JJ, ''et al'' |title=Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=358 |issue=13 |pages=1336–45 |year=2008 |month=March |pmid=18367736 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa072100 |url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/358/13/1336 |issn=}}</ref> Using clinical risk factors alone, the area under the [[receiver operating-characteristic curve]] (AUC) was 0.79 while the AUC rose to 0.83 when the calcium score was added. The clinical importance of this rise is not clear.<ref name="pmid18367744">{{cite journal |author=Weintraub WS, Diamond GA |title=Predicting cardiovascular events with coronary calcium scoring |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=358 |issue=13 |pages=1394–6 |year=2008 |month=March |pmid=18367744 |doi=10.1056/NEJMe0800676 |url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=short&pmid=18367744&promo=ONFLNS19 |issn=}}</ref>


===C-reactive protein===
A more recent [[cohort study]] found that the calcium score added to traditional risk factors in  predicting cardiac outcomes.<ref name="pmid20424251">{{cite journal| author=Polonsky TS, McClelland RL, Jorgensen NW, Bild DE, Burke GL, Guerci AD et al.| title=Coronary artery calcium score and risk classification for coronary heart disease prediction. | journal=JAMA | year= 2010 | volume= 303 | issue= 16 | pages= 1610-6 | pmid=20424251 | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=clinical.uthscsa.edu/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=20424251 | doi=10.1001/jama.2010.461}}</ref> The [[sensitivity  and specificity|Net reclassification improvement]] was 25%.
{{main|C-reactive protein}}
Abnormal high sensitivity [[C-reactive protein]] (CRP) values may assist in assessing [[cholesterol]] measurements in apparently healthy people due to the theory that chronic inflammation precedes [[atherosclerosis]].<ref name="pmid16818927">Lloyd-Jones DM, Liu K, Tian L, Greenland P. [http://annals.org/cgi/content/full/145/1/35 Narrative review: Assessment of C-reactive protein in risk prediction for cardiovascular disease]. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Jul 4;145(1):35-42. PMID 16818927</ref> However, the ability of the CRP to add to other methods of predicting heart disease such as the [http://hp2010.nhlbihin.net/atpiii/calculator.asp Framingham risk tool] is limited.<ref name="pmid16818927"/>
 
In one study, the CRP did not add to the coronary calcium score.<ref name="pmid18367736">{{cite journal |author=Detrano R, Guerci AD, Carr JJ, ''et al'' |title=Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=358 |issue=13 |pages=1336–45 |year=2008 |month=March |pmid=18367736 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa072100 |url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/358/13/1336 |issn=}}</ref>


===Cardiac stress test===
===Cardiac stress test===
Line 126: Line 203:


====Exercise treadmill test====
====Exercise treadmill test====
The [[exercise test|exercise treadmill test]] (ETT) can help diagnose and prognose patients with suspected CHD. [[Clinical prediction rule]]s are available to help interpret the results of the ETT. These rules are the [http://www.cardiology.org/tools/medcalc/duke/ Duke Treadmill score]<ref name="pmid1875969">{{cite journal |author=Mark DB, Shaw L, Harrell FE, ''et al'' |title=Prognostic value of a treadmill exercise score in outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=325 |issue=12 |pages=849–53 |year=1991 |pmid=1875969 |doi=}}</ref> and the newer [http://www.bio.ri.ccf.org/html/riskcal.html Cleveland Clinic model]<ref name="pmid18087052">{{cite journal |author=Lauer MS, Pothier CE, Magid DJ, Smith SS, Kattan MW |title=An externally validated model for predicting long-term survival after exercise treadmill testing in patients with suspected coronary artery disease and a normal electrocardiogram |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=147 |issue=12 |pages=821–8 |year=2007 |pmid=18087052 |doi=}}</ref>. The Duke score has been more extensively studied; however, in a direct comparison by the authors of the Cleveland Clinic model, the latter performed better.<ref name="pmid18087052"/>
The [[exercise test|exercise treadmill test]] (ETT) can help diagnose and prognose patients with suspected CHD. [[Clinical prediction rule]]s are available to help interpret the results of the ETT. These rules are the [http://www.cardiology.org/tools/medcalc/duke/ Duke Treadmill score]<ref name="pmid1875969">{{cite journal |author=Mark DB, Shaw L, Harrell FE, ''et al'' |title=Prognostic value of a treadmill exercise score in outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=325 |issue=12 |pages=849–53 |year=1991|url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/325/12/849|pmid=1875969 |doi=}}</ref> and the newer [http://www.bio.ri.ccf.org/html/riskcal.html Cleveland Clinic model]<ref name="pmid18087052">{{cite journal |author=Lauer MS, Pothier CE, Magid DJ, Smith SS, Kattan MW |title=An externally validated model for predicting long-term survival after exercise treadmill testing in patients with suspected coronary artery disease and a normal electrocardiogram |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=147 |issue=12 |pages=821–8 |year=2007 |url=http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/147/12/821|pmid=18087052 |doi=}}</ref>. The Duke score has been more extensively studied; however, in a direct comparison by the authors of the Cleveland Clinic model, the latter performed better (c-index: 0.83 vs. 0.73).<ref name="pmid18087052"/>


The ETT adds to clinical risk factors in prediction complications. The area under the receiver-operator-characteristics-curve (AUC) for clinical data alone is 0.798 and rises to 0.857 when the ETT is added.<ref name="pmid1875969">{{cite journal |author=Mark DB, Shaw L, Harrell FE, ''et al'' |title=Prognostic value of a treadmill exercise score in outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=325 |issue=12 |pages=849–53 |year=1991 |month=September |pmid=1875969 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref>
The ETT adds to clinical risk factors in prediction complications. The area under the receiver-operator-characteristics-curve (AUC) for clinical data alone is 0.798 and rises to 0.857 when the ETT is added.<ref name="pmid1875969"/>


The ETT also adds to the cardiac catheterization in prognosticating.<ref name="pmid8498316">{{cite journal |author=Morris CK, Morrow K, Froelicher VF, ''et al'' |title=Prediction of cardiovascular death by means of clinical and exercise test variables in patients selected for cardiac catheterization |journal=Am. Heart J. |volume=125 |issue=6 |pages=1717–26 |year=1993 |month=June |pmid=8498316 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref> In fact, only the left ventricular ejection fraction contributed to the ETT in predicting complications.<ref name="pmid8498316">{{cite journal |author=Morris CK, Morrow K, Froelicher VF, ''et al'' |title=Prediction of cardiovascular death by means of clinical and exercise test variables in patients selected for cardiac catheterization |journal=Am. Heart J. |volume=125 |issue=6 |pages=1717–26 |year=1993 |month=June |pmid=8498316 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref>
The ETT also adds to the cardiac catheterization in prognosticating<ref name="pmid6229569">{{cite journal |author=Weiner DA, Ryan TJ, McCabe CH, ''et al'' |title=Prognostic importance of a clinical profile and exercise test in medically treated patients with coronary artery disease |journal=J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. |volume=3 |issue=3 |pages=772–9 |year=1984 |month=March |pmid=6229569 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref><ref name="pmid3579066">{{cite journal |author=Mark DB, Hlatky MA, Harrell FE, Lee KL, Califf RM, Pryor DB |title=Exercise treadmill score for predicting prognosis in coronary artery disease |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=106 |issue=6 |pages=793–800 |year=1987 |month=June |pmid=3579066 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref><ref name="pmid8498316">{{cite journal |author=Morris CK, Morrow K, Froelicher VF, ''et al'' |title=Prediction of cardiovascular death by means of clinical and exercise test variables in patients selected for cardiac catheterization |journal=Am. Heart J. |volume=125 |issue=6 |pages=1717–26 |year=1993 |month=June |pmid=8498316 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref> although some researchers have questioned the extent of information provided by the treadmill test<ref name="pmid449990"/>. However, in one study among information available from cardiac catheterization, only the left ventricular ejection fraction contributed to the ETT in predicting complications<ref name="pmid8498316">{{cite journal |author=Morris CK, Morrow K, Froelicher VF, ''et al'' |title=Prediction of cardiovascular death by means of clinical and exercise test variables in patients selected for cardiac catheterization |journal=Am. Heart J. |volume=125 |issue=6 |pages=1717–26 |year=1993 |month=June |pmid=8498316 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref> whereas in another study, both the left ventricular ejection fraction and the number of stenoses aided prediction<ref name="pmid6229569">{{cite journal |author=Weiner DA, Ryan TJ, McCabe CH, ''et al'' |title=Prognostic importance of a clinical profile and exercise test in medically treated patients with coronary artery disease |journal=J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. |volume=3 |issue=3 |pages=772–9 |year=1984 |month=March |pmid=6229569 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref>.


===Cardiac catheterization===
===Cardiac catheterization===
Line 154: Line 231:
Much research has addressed the association between severity of coronary obstructions and subsequent complications such as [[myocardial infarction]]s. Coronary obstructions are more likely to progress or occlude within 4-5 years if the obstructions are severe according to the CASS investigation.<ref name="pmid8409054">{{cite journal |author=Alderman EL, Corley SD, Fisher LD, ''et al'' |title=Five-year angiographic follow-up of factors associated with progression of coronary artery disease in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). CASS Participating Investigators and Staff |journal=J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. |volume=22 |issue=4 |pages=1141–54 |year=1993 |month=October |pmid=8409054 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref> 23% of subsequent occlusions were associated with a [[myocardial infarction]]. The [[cholesterol]] level or the [[exercise test]] did not improve the ability to prediction occlusion in the CASS investigation.
Much research has addressed the association between severity of coronary obstructions and subsequent complications such as [[myocardial infarction]]s. Coronary obstructions are more likely to progress or occlude within 4-5 years if the obstructions are severe according to the CASS investigation.<ref name="pmid8409054">{{cite journal |author=Alderman EL, Corley SD, Fisher LD, ''et al'' |title=Five-year angiographic follow-up of factors associated with progression of coronary artery disease in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). CASS Participating Investigators and Staff |journal=J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. |volume=22 |issue=4 |pages=1141–54 |year=1993 |month=October |pmid=8409054 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref> 23% of subsequent occlusions were associated with a [[myocardial infarction]]. The [[cholesterol]] level or the [[exercise test]] did not improve the ability to prediction occlusion in the CASS investigation.


Surprisingly, while patients with more severe stenoses are more likely to develop occlusions predicting the exact site of furture occlusions is very difficult. Most subsequent occlusions occur in arteries that originally did not have severe stenoses and were originally not the most severely stenotic arteries in a patient.<ref name="pmid3180375">{{cite journal |author=Little WC, Constantinescu M, Applegate RJ, ''et al'' |title=Can coronary angiography predict the site of a subsequent myocardial infarction in patients with mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease? |journal=Circulation |volume=78 |issue=5 Pt 1 |pages=1157–66 |year=1988 |month=November |pmid=3180375 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref><ref name="pmid1546645">{{cite journal |author=Giroud D, Li JM, Urban P, Meier B, Rutishauer W |title=Relation of the site of acute myocardial infarction to the most severe coronary arterial stenosis at prior angiography |journal=Am. J. Cardiol. |volume=69 |issue=8 |pages=729–32 |year=1992 |month=March |pmid=1546645 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref><ref name="pmid15623544">{{cite journal |author=Glaser R, Selzer F, Faxon DP, ''et al'' |title=Clinical progression of incidental, asymptomatic lesions discovered during culprit vessel coronary intervention |journal=Circulation |volume=111 |issue=2 |pages=143–9 |year=2005 |month=January |pmid=15623544 |doi=10.1161/01.CIR.0000150335.01285.12 |url=http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=15623544 |issn=}}</ref><ref name="pmid3379219">{{cite journal |author=Ambrose JA, Tannenbaum MA, Alexopoulos D, ''et al'' |title=Angiographic progression of coronary artery disease and the development of myocardial infarction |journal=J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. |volume=12 |issue=1 |pages=56–62 |year=1988 |month=July |pmid=3379219 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref>
Surprisingly, while patients with more severe stenoses are more likely to develop occlusions predicting the exact site of furture occlusions is very difficult. Most subsequent occlusions occur in arteries that originally did not have severe stenoses and were originally not the most severely stenotic arteries in a patient.<ref name="pmid3180375"/><ref name="pmid1546645">{{cite journal |author=Giroud D, Li JM, Urban P, Meier B, Rutishauer W |title=Relation of the site of acute myocardial infarction to the most severe coronary arterial stenosis at prior angiography |journal=Am. J. Cardiol. |volume=69 |issue=8 |pages=729–32 |year=1992 |month=March |pmid=1546645 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref><ref name="pmid15623544">{{cite journal |author=Glaser R, Selzer F, Faxon DP, ''et al'' |title=Clinical progression of incidental, asymptomatic lesions discovered during culprit vessel coronary intervention |journal=Circulation |volume=111 |issue=2 |pages=143–9 |year=2005 |month=January |pmid=15623544 |doi=10.1161/01.CIR.0000150335.01285.12 |url=http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=15623544 |issn=}}</ref><ref name="pmid3379219">{{cite journal |author=Ambrose JA, Tannenbaum MA, Alexopoulos D, ''et al'' |title=Angiographic progression of coronary artery disease and the development of myocardial infarction |journal=J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. |volume=12 |issue=1 |pages=56–62 |year=1988 |month=July |pmid=3379219 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref>


In addition, when occlusions develop in severely stenotic vessels, these occlusions may be less likely to cause a [[myocardial infarction]].<ref name="pmid3379219">{{cite journal |author=Ambrose JA, Tannenbaum MA, Alexopoulos D, ''et al'' |title=Angiographic progression of coronary artery disease and the development of myocardial infarction |journal=J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. |volume=12 |issue=1 |pages=56–62 |year=1988 |month=July |pmid=3379219 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref>
In addition, when occlusions develop in severely stenotic vessels, these occlusions may be less likely to cause a [[myocardial infarction]].<ref name="pmid3379219">{{cite journal |author=Ambrose JA, Tannenbaum MA, Alexopoulos D, ''et al'' |title=Angiographic progression of coronary artery disease and the development of myocardial infarction |journal=J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. |volume=12 |issue=1 |pages=56–62 |year=1988 |month=July |pmid=3379219 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref>


In summary, the concept of which coronary stenoses are ''vulnerable'' to subsequent plaque rupture and occlusion many be more important that the degree of stenosis of a vessel.<ref name="pmid14530185">{{cite journal |author=Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, ''et al'' |title=From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I |journal=Circulation |volume=108 |issue=14 |pages=1664–72 |year=2003 |month=October |pmid=14530185 |doi=10.1161/01.CIR.0000087480.94275.97 |url=http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=14530185 |issn=}}</ref>
In summary, the concept of which coronary stenoses are ''vulnerable'' to subsequent plaque rupture and occlusion many be more important that the degree of stenosis of a vessel.<ref name="pmid14530185">{{cite journal |author=Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, ''et al'' |title=From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I |journal=Circulation |volume=108 |issue=14 |pages=1664–72 |year=2003 |month=October |pmid=14530185 |doi=10.1161/01.CIR.0000087480.94275.97 |url=http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=14530185 |issn=}}</ref>
==Screening==
Asymptomatic adults should not be screened for [[coronary artery disease]] with an [[electrocardiogram]].<ref name="pmid22847227">{{cite journal| author=Moyer VA, on behalf of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force*| title=Screening for Coronary Heart Disease With Electrocardiography: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. | journal=Ann Intern Med | year= 2012 | volume=  | issue=  | pages=  | pmid=22847227 | doi=10.7326/0003-4819-157-7-201210020-00514 | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=22847227  }} </ref>


==Prevention==
==Prevention==
Coronary heart disease is the most common form of heart disease in the Western world. Prevention centers on the modifiable risk factors, which include decreasing [[cholesterol]] levels, addressing [[obesity]] and [[hypertension]], avoiding a [[sedentary lifestyle]], making healthy dietary choices, and [[smoking cessation|stopping smoking]]. There is some evidence that lowering [[uric acid]] and [[homocysteine]] levels may contribute. In [[diabetes mellitus]], there is little evidence that [[blood sugar]] control actually improves cardiac risk. Some recommend a diet rich in omega-3 fatty acids and [[vitamin C]]. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends "low to moderate alcohol intake" to reduce risk of coronary heart disease.<ref>http://www.who.int/nutrition/topics/5_population_nutrient/en/index12.html</ref>
{{main|Vascular disease#Prevention}}


An increasingly growing number of other [[physiological]] markers and [[homeostatic]] mechanisms are currently under scientific investigation.  Among these markers are [[low density lipoprotein]] and [[asymmetric dimethylarginine]].  Patients with CHD and those trying to prevent CHD are advised to avoid fats that are readily oxidized (e.g., saturated fats and trans-fats), limit carbohydrates and processed sugars to reduce production of [[Low density lipoprotein]]s while increasing [[High density lipoprotein]]s, keeping [[blood pressure]] normal, exercise and stop smoking.  These measures limit the progression of the disease.  Recent studies have shown that dramatic reduction in LDL levels can cause mild regression of coronary heart disease.
==References==
<small>
<references>


===Exercise===
</references>
Separate to the question of the benefits of exercise; it is unclear whether doctors should spend time counseling patients to exercise. The [http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstfix.htm U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)], based on a [[systematic review]] of [[randomized controlled trials]], found 'insufficient evidence' to recommend that doctors counsel patients on exercise.<ref name="pmid12160370">{{cite journal |author= |title=Behavioral counseling in primary care to promote physical activity: recommendation and rationale |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=137 |issue=3 |pages=205-7 |year=2002 |pmid=12160370 |doi=}}</ref> However, the [[American Heart Association]], based on a non-systematic review, recommends that doctors counsel patients on exercise <ref name="pmid12821592">{{cite journal |author=Thompson PD, Buchner D, Pina IL, ''et al'' |title=Exercise and physical activity in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention) and the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity) |journal=Circulation |volume=107 |issue=24 |pages=3109-16 |year=2003 |pmid=12821592 |doi=10.1161/01.CIR.0000075572.40158.77}} http://www.ngc.gov/summary/summary.aspx?ss=15&doc_id=5360&string=#s23</ref>  
</small>  


===Preventive diets===
Dietary changes can potentially lead to large changes in the cholesterol.<ref name="pmid1944471">{{cite journal |author=McMurry MP, Cerqueira MT, Connor SL, Connor WE |title=Changes in lipid and lipoprotein levels and body weight in Tarahumara Indians after consumption of an affluent diet |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=325 |issue=24 |pages=1704-8 |year=1991 |pmid=1944471 |doi=|url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/325/24/1704}}</ref>


===Aspirin===
[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]]
Aspirin, in doses of less than 75 to 81 mg/d<ref name="pmid17488967">{{cite journal |author=Campbell CL, Smyth S, Montalescot G, Steinhubl SR |title=Aspirin dose for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review |journal=JAMA |volume=297 |issue=18 |pages=2018-24 |year=2007 |pmid=17488967 |doi=10.1001/jama.297.18.2018}}</ref>, can reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events.<ref name="pmid16418466">{{cite journal |author=Berger J, Roncaglioni M, Avanzini F, Pangrazzi I, Tognoni G, Brown D |title=Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events in women and men: a sex-specific meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |journal=JAMA |volume=295 |issue=3 |pages=306-13 |year=2006 |pmid=16418466 | url=http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/294/1/47}}</ref> The [http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstfix.htm U.S. Preventive Services Task Force] 'strongly recommends that clinicians discuss aspirin chemoprevention with adults who are at increased risk for coronary heart disease'.<ref name="pmid11790071">{{cite journal |author= |title=Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events: recommendation and rationale |journal=Ann Intern Med |volume=136 |issue=2 |pages=157-60 |year=2002 |pmid=11790071 | url=http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/136/2/157}}</ref> The Task Force defines increased risk as 'Men older than 40 years of age, postmenopausal women, and younger persons with risk factors for coronary heart disease (for example, hypertension, diabetes, or smoking) are at increased risk for heart disease and may wish to consider aspirin therapy'. More specifically, high-risk persons are 'those with a 5-year risk ≥ 3%'. A risk calculator is available.<ref>http://www.med-decisions.com/</ref>
 
Regarding healthy women, the more recent [[Women's Health Study]] [[randomized controlled trial]] found [[statistical significance|insignficant]] benefit from aspirin in the reduction of cardiac events; however there was a [[statistical significance|signficant]] reduction in [[stroke]].<ref name="pmid15753114">{{cite journal |author=Ridker P, Cook N, Lee I, Gordon D, Gaziano J, Manson J, Hennekens C, Buring J |title=A randomized trial of low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women |journal=N Engl J Med |volume=352 |issue=13 |pages=1293-304 |year=2005 |pmid=15753114 | rul=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/352/13/1293 | doi=10.1056/NEJMoa050613}}</ref> [[Subgroup analysis]] showed that all benefit was confined to women over 65 years old.<ref name="pmid15753114" /> In spite of the [[statistical significance|insignficant]] benefit for women < 65 years old, recent [[Clinical practice guideline|practice guidelines]] by the [[American Heart Association]] recommend to 'consider' aspirin in 'healthy women' <65 years of age 'when benefit for ischemic stroke prevention is likely to outweigh adverse effects of therapy'.<ref>http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.181546v1</ref>
 
===Antilipemic drugs===
The [http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstfix.htm U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)] estimated that after 5 to 7 years of treatment with [[statins]], the  [[relative risk reduction]] of coronary heart disease events is decreased by approximately 30%<ref name="pmid11306236">{{cite journal |author=Pignone MP, Phillips CJ, Atkins D, Teutsch SM, Mulrow CD, Lohr KN |title=Screening and treating adults for lipid disorders |journal=American journal of preventive medicine |volume=20 |issue=3 Suppl |pages=77–89 |year=2001 |pmid=11306236 |doi=}}</ref><ref name="webPignone">{{cite web |url=http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/ajpmsuppl/lipidrr.htm |title=Screening for Lipid Disorders: Recommendations and Rationale |accessdate=2007-10-17 |format= |work=}}</ref>. More recently, a [[meta-analysis]] reported an almost identical  [[relative risk reduction]] of 29.2% in low risk patients treated for 4.3 years <ref name="pmid17130382">{{cite journal |author=Thavendiranathan P, Bagai A, Brookhart M, Choudhry N |title=Primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases with statin therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |journal=Arch Intern Med |volume=166 |issue=21 |pages=2307-13 |year=2006 |pmid=17130382}}</ref>. A [[relative risk reduction]] of 19% in coronary mortality was found in a [[meta-analysis]] of patients at all levels of risk.<ref name="pmid16214597">{{cite journal |author=Baigent C, Keech A, Kearney PM, ''et al'' |title=Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins |journal=Lancet |volume=366 |issue=9493 |pages=1267-78 |year=2005 |pmid=16214597 |doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67394-1}}</ref>
 
Various [[clinical practice guidelines]] have addressed the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. The [[American College of Physicians]] has addressed hypercholesterolemia in patients with [[diabetes]] <ref name="pmid15096336">{{cite journal |author=Snow V, Aronson M, Hornbake E, Mottur-Pilson C, Weiss K |title=Lipid control in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians |journal=Ann Intern Med |volume=140 |issue=8 |pages=644-9 |year=2004 |pmid=15096336 | url=http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/140/8/644}}</ref>. Their recommendations are:
*  Recommendation 1: Lipid-lowering therapy should be used for secondary prevention of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity for all patients (both men and women) with known coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes.
* Recommendation 2: Statins should be used for primary prevention against macrovascular complications in patients (both men and women) with type 2 diabetes and other cardiovascular risk factors.
* Recommendation 3: Once lipid-lowering therapy is initiated, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus should be taking at least moderate doses of a statin (the accompanying evidence report states "simvastatin, 40 mg/d; pravastatin, 40 mg/d; lovastatin, 40 mg/d; atorvastatin, 20 mg/d; or an equivalent dose of another statin")<ref name="pmid15096337">{{cite journal |author=Vijan S, Hayward RA |title=Pharmacologic lipid-lowering therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus: background paper for the American College of Physicians |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=140 |issue=8 |pages=650-8 |year=2004 |pmid=15096337 |doi=|url=http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/140/8/650}}</ref>.
* Recommendation 4: For those patients with type 2 diabetes who are taking statins, routine monitoring of liver function tests or muscle enzymes is not recommended except in specific circumstances.
 
The [[National Cholesterol Education Program]] revised their guidelines<ref name="pmid15358046">{{cite journal |author=Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CN, Brewer HB, Clark LT, Hunninghake DB, Pasternak RC, Smith SC, Stone NJ |title=Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines |journal=J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. |volume=44 |issue=3 |pages=720-32 |year=2004 |pmid=15358046 |doi=10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.001}}</ref>; however, their 2004 revisions have been criticized for use of nonrandomized, observational data.<ref name="pmid17015870">{{cite journal |author=Hayward RA, Hofer TP, Vijan S |title=Narrative review: lack of evidence for recommended low-density lipoprotein treatment targets: a solvable problem |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=145 |issue=7 |pages=520-30 |year=2006 |pmid=17015870 |doi=}}</ref>
 
===Omega-3 fatty acids (fish oil)===
{{main|Fish oil}}
 
===Homocysteine lowering===
A [[meta-analysis]] concluded that lowering [[homocysteine]] with folic acid and other supplements may reduce stroke.<ref name="pmid17544768">{{cite journal |author=Wang X, Qin X, Demirtas H, ''et al'' |title=Efficacy of folic acid supplementation in stroke prevention: a meta-analysis |journal=Lancet |volume=369 |issue=9576 |pages=1876-82 |year=2007 |pmid=17544768 |doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60854-X}}PMID 17544768</ref> However, the two largest [[randomized controlled trial]]s included in the meta-analysis had conflicting results. Lonn reported positive results<ref name="pmid16531613">{{cite journal |author=Lonn E, Yusuf S, Arnold MJ, ''et al'' |title=Homocysteine lowering with folic acid and B vitamins in vascular disease |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=354 |issue=15 |pages=1567-77 |year=2006 |pmid=16531613 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa060900}}PMID 16531613</ref>; whereas the trial by Toole was negative.<ref name="pmid14762035">{{cite journal |author=Toole JF, Malinow MR, Chambless LE, ''et al'' |title=Lowering homocysteine in patients with ischemic stroke to prevent recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction, and death: the Vitamin Intervention for Stroke Prevention (VISP) randomized controlled trial |journal=JAMA |volume=291 |issue=5 |pages=565-75 |year=2004 |pmid=14762035 |doi=10.1001/jama.291.5.565}}PMID 14762035</ref>
 
Since the meta-analysis, two additional trials have shown no reduction in cardiovascular endpoint despite successfully lowering the plasma homocysteine level.<ref name="pmid">{{cite journal |author= |title= |journal= |volume= |issue= |pages= |year= |pmid= |doi= |url=http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=18460663 |issn=}}</ref><ref>Ebbing M, Bleie O, Ueland PM, Nordrehaug JE, Nilsen DW, Vollset SE, et al. [http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/300/7/795 Mortality and Cardiovascular Events in Patients Treated With Homocysteine-Lowering B Vitamins After Coronary Angiography: A Randomized Controlled Trial]. JAMA. 2008 Aug 20;300(7):795-804.</ref>
 
==References==
<references/>
 
==Sell also==
* [[Acute coronary syndrome]]
* [[Myocardial infarction]]
* [[Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty]]
* [[Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score]]

Latest revision as of 11:47, 29 September 2024

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
https://en.citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Coronary_heart_disease&printable=yes
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Coronary heart disease (CHD), also called coronary artery disease (CAD), is a vascular disease caused by abnormalities the arteries that supply the heart with blood (called the coronary arteries). The usual cause of coronary heart disease is atherosclerosis.

Etiology/cause

The cause and manifestation of coronary heart disease is multifactorial. About 3/4 of the risk of coronary heart disease is due to three risk factors: hypercholesterolemia (total cholesterol > 182 mg/dL [4.71 mmol/L]), hypertension (diastolic blood pressure > 90 mm Hg), and cigarette smoking.[1]

Atherosclerosis

For more information, see: Atherosclerosis.

Atherosclerosis is a degenerative disease of the arterial walls, in which the normal elastic walls of the arteries become thickened and replaced with deposits of fatty material, including cholesterol. As the walls of the affected arteries thicken, the hollow lumen at the center of each, that conduit through which oxygen enriched blood normally pulses, becomes narrower and, eventually, the flow of blood within it is decreased. With narrowing of the artery's lumen and reduced flow comes the risk of sudden occlusion of the artery, especially if the lining is abnormally roughened by deposits of irregular plaques of minerals and fats. However, the site of current stenoses does not predict the site of a subsequent myocardial infarction.[2]

About 10% of patients with chronic angina have atherosclerosis of the left main coronary artery.[3][4] In males over age 70 with definite angina, almost 50% have obstruction of the left main coronary artery.[4]

The extent of coronary obstructions can be quantified with:

Plaque rupture and inflammation

Rupture of atherosclerotic plaques may cause acute coronary syndrome. Inflammation may underlay the association between elevated C-reactive protein levels and coronary heart disease.

Surprisingly, more fatal ruptures occur on plaques that are not severely stenosed.[7][8][9]

Periodontal disease may contribute to this inflammation.[10][11] Poor oral hygiene is associated with elevated C-reactive protein and fibrinogen.[11]

Coronary vasospasm

Approximately 15% of NSTEMI and 2% of STEMI patients have no obstruction of coronary arteries and in about half of these patients, spasm of a coronary artery can be induced.[12]

Syndrome X

Cardiac syndrome X is the presence of typical angina, abnormal exercise-test results, and normal coronary arteries (including no vasospasm).[13] Syndrome X may be caused by subendocardial hypoperfusion that can be demonstrated by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging during the administration of adenosine.[13]

Hyperuricemia

For more information, see: Hyperuricemia.

Hyperuricemia has been proposed as contributing to coronary heart disease.

Diagnosis

History, physical examination, and risk factors

Angina pectoris, or simply angina, is the chest pain due to coronary heart disease; however, most patients do not report angina.[14] The nature of the chest pain affects the probability of underlying coronary disease.[15]

The likeilood of coronary heart disease is associated with the number of risk factors and the nature of chest pain.[16][17] A table of probabilities is available online.

The Pryor nomogram, a clinical prediction rule, can help diagnose patients with suspected chest pain in a non emergent setting.[18][19]

Cardiac stress test

For more information, see: Stress test.
Sensitivity and specificity of cardiac stress tests[20]
  Sensitivity Specificity
Exercise electrocardiography 68% 77%
Stress echocardiography 76% 88%
Myocardial perfusion imaging
thallium planar 		79% 73%
Myocardial perfusion imaging
single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) 		88% 77%
Positron emission tomography (PET), 68% 77%

The sensitivity and specificity of the various cardiac stress tests have been summarized.[20]

Exercise treadmill test

The exercise treadmill test (ETT) can help diagnose and prognose patients with suspected CHD. The likelihood of a positive treadmill test depends on the severity of the underlying coronary disease.[3] For example, 87% of patients with obstruction of the left main coronary artery will have a positive treatmill test, whereas only 57% of patients with obstructions of one or two of the other coronaries will have a positive treadmill test. The treadmill can help predict the location of coronary stenoses.[21]

Stress myocardial perfusion imaging

Stress echocardiography

Stress ventriculography

Diagnostic imaging

Several types of imaging, ranging from noninvasive to minimally invasive to invasive, can assess the degree of CHD. They include techniques using radiation transmitted through the body, imaging of radioisotopes in the body, or imaging using other mechanisms such as MRI and ultrasonography.

Most are performed before and after cardiac stress, which may be induced either by controlled exercise or pharmacologically, with drugs that stimulate the heart.

Techniques

Electron beam computed tomography

Electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) is also called ultrafast CT.

Cardiac computed tomographic angiography
For more information, see: Computed tomographic cardiac angiography.

Computed tomographic cardiac angiography has accuracy of:[22]

Single-Photon Emission-Computed Tomography
Stress echocardiography

Ultrasound-based echocardiography has long been a preferred method for assessing valvular function. cardiac output and wall movement, but, especially with the use of ultrasound-appropriate contrast media, allows better vascular visualization.

Cardiac catheterization and angiography

Indications for renal arteriography at the time of coronary arteriography have been summarized.[23]

Magnetic resonance imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging has accuracy of:[22]

Evaluation: Coronary calcium score

Both types of computed tomography, electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) and multidetector spiral computed tomography, can measure the amount of calcium in the walls of the coronary arteries in order to diagnose coronary heart disease.

Clinical practice guidelines conflict regarding the role of the coronary calcium score. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force[24] does not endorse using the score while the American Heart Association[25] does endorse the score. The Task Force that the best study was still compromised by using volunteers rather than being community based.[26]

Treatment

Medications

Ranolazine may increased exercise capacity and reduce symptoms[27] but not reduce cardiac events.[28]

Adrenergic beta-antagonists

Adrenergic beta-antagonists were first shown to be effective in 1981.[29]

Invasive treatments

For more information, see: myocardial revascularization.

Patient who have a left ventricular ejection fraction above 50%, no angina or their angina is controlled with medicines, do not benefit from either percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PCI)[30] or from coronary artery bypass surgery[31].

Coronary artery bypass versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty[32]
  Outcomes at 5 years Procedural related stroke
Relief of angina Repeat revascularization
CABG 84% 10% 1.2%
PTCA 79% With stents 40%
Without stents 46%		 0.6%
Abbreviations:
CABG. Coronary artery bypass grafting
PTCA. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

Regarding patients who must undergo invasive treatment, a systematic review comparing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery found that CABG was more effective but was more likely to be complicated by stroke.[32]

Percutaneous cardiac intervention

For more information, see: Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Patient who have a stable angina and left ventricular ejection fraction above 35% do not reduce mortality from percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PCI)[33] although there is some reduction in angina for the first one to three years after procedure and few patients received stents[34][35][33]. The relief from angina, as compared to relief from medical therapy, may be reduced when evidence-based medications are used.[30]

Patients are more likely to benefit from PCI when clinical practice guidelines are followed.[36]

Stents

Meta-anlayses have found that the rate of late thrombosis was <2% between years 1 and 4.[37][38][39]

Coronary artery bypass

For more information, see: Coronary artery bypass.


Patient who have a left ventricular ejection fraction between 35 and 49 percent benefit from coronary artery bypass if they have disease of three coronary arteries.[31].

Complications

Acute coronary syndrome

For more information, see: Acute coronary syndrome.

Prognosis

See also: Vascular disease#Prognosis

Coronary calcium score

Coronary calcium score for predicting myocardial infarction or death from coronary heart disease amond 6814 persons without known cardiovascular disease[40]
Score Number of patients Hazard ratio
0 8/3409 1.0
1-100 25/1728 3.9
101-300 24/752 7.1
> 300 32/833 6.8

Both types of computed tomography, electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) and multidetector spiral computed tomography, can measure the amount of calcium in the walls of the coronary arteries in order to estimate prognosis. The calcium score improves upon using clinical risk factors for prognosticating. [40] Using clinical risk factors alone, the area under the receiver operating-characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.79 while the AUC rose to 0.83 when the calcium score was added. The clinical importance of this rise is not clear.[41]

A more recent cohort study found that the calcium score added to traditional risk factors in predicting cardiac outcomes.[42] The Net reclassification improvement was 25%.

Cardiac stress test

Various cardiac stress tests are available.

Exercise treadmill test

The exercise treadmill test (ETT) can help diagnose and prognose patients with suspected CHD. Clinical prediction rules are available to help interpret the results of the ETT. These rules are the Duke Treadmill score[43] and the newer Cleveland Clinic model[44]. The Duke score has been more extensively studied; however, in a direct comparison by the authors of the Cleveland Clinic model, the latter performed better (c-index: 0.83 vs. 0.73).[44]

The ETT adds to clinical risk factors in prediction complications. The area under the receiver-operator-characteristics-curve (AUC) for clinical data alone is 0.798 and rises to 0.857 when the ETT is added.[43]

The ETT also adds to the cardiac catheterization in prognosticating[45][46][47] although some researchers have questioned the extent of information provided by the treadmill test[17]. However, in one study among information available from cardiac catheterization, only the left ventricular ejection fraction contributed to the ETT in predicting complications[47] whereas in another study, both the left ventricular ejection fraction and the number of stenoses aided prediction[45].

Cardiac catheterization

Rates of occlusion after 4-5 years[48]
Severity of original stenosis Rate of subsequent occlusion
No stenosis 0.7%
5% to 49% 2.3%
50% to 80% 10.1%
81% to 95% 23.6%

Much research has addressed the association between severity of coronary obstructions and subsequent complications such as myocardial infarctions. Coronary obstructions are more likely to progress or occlude within 4-5 years if the obstructions are severe according to the CASS investigation.[48] 23% of subsequent occlusions were associated with a myocardial infarction. The cholesterol level or the exercise test did not improve the ability to prediction occlusion in the CASS investigation.

Surprisingly, while patients with more severe stenoses are more likely to develop occlusions predicting the exact site of furture occlusions is very difficult. Most subsequent occlusions occur in arteries that originally did not have severe stenoses and were originally not the most severely stenotic arteries in a patient.[2][49][50][51]

In addition, when occlusions develop in severely stenotic vessels, these occlusions may be less likely to cause a myocardial infarction.[51]

In summary, the concept of which coronary stenoses are vulnerable to subsequent plaque rupture and occlusion many be more important that the degree of stenosis of a vessel.[52]

Screening

Asymptomatic adults should not be screened for coronary artery disease with an electrocardiogram.[53]

Prevention

For more information, see: Vascular disease#Prevention.


References

  1. ↑ Magnus P, Beaglehole R (2001). "The real contribution of the major risk factors to the coronary epidemics: time to end the "only-50%" myth". Arch. Intern. Med. 161 (22): 2657–60. PMID 11732929. [e]
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Little WC, Constantinescu M, Applegate RJ, Kutcher MA, Burrows MT, Kahl FR et al. (1988). "Can coronary angiography predict the site of a subsequent myocardial infarction in patients with mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease?". Circulation 78 (5 Pt 1): 1157-66. PMID 3180375. [e]
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Lee TH, Fukui T, Weinstein MC, Tosteson AN, Goldman L (1988). "Cost-effectiveness of screening strategies for left main coronary artery disease in patients with stable angina". Med Decis Making 8 (4): 268–78. PMID 3141736. [e]
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 Chaitman BR, Bourassa MG, Davis K, et al (August 1981). "Angiographic prevalence of high-risk coronary artery disease in patient subsets (CASS)". Circulation 64 (2): 360–7. PMID 7249303. [e]
  5. ↑ Valgimigli M, Serruys PW, Tsuchida K, et al (April 2007). "Cyphering the complexity of coronary artery disease using the syntax score to predict clinical outcome in patients with three-vessel lumen obstruction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention". Am. J. Cardiol. 99 (8): 1072–81. DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.11.062. PMID 17437730. Research Blogging.
  6. ↑ Mark DB, Nelson CL, Califf RM, et al (May 1994). "Continuing evolution of therapy for coronary artery disease. Initial results from the era of coronary angioplasty". Circulation 89 (5): 2015–25. PMID 8181125. [e]
  7. ↑ Mann JM, Davies MJ (1996). "Vulnerable plaque. Relation of characteristics to degree of stenosis in human coronary arteries.". Circulation 94 (5): 928-31. PMID 8790027. [e]
  8. ↑ Kolodgie FD, Virmani R, Burke AP, Farb A, Weber DK, Kutys R et al. (2004). "Pathologic assessment of the vulnerable human coronary plaque.". Heart 90 (12): 1385-91. DOI:10.1136/hrt.2004.041798. PMID 15547008. PMC PMC1768577. Research Blogging.
  9. ↑ Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, Schwartz SM (2000). "Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions.". Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20 (5): 1262-75. PMID 10807742. [e]
  10. ↑ Humphrey LL, Fu R, Buckley DI, Freeman M, Helfand M (December 2008). "Periodontal disease and coronary heart disease incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis". J Gen Intern Med 23 (12): 2079–86. DOI:10.1007/s11606-008-0787-6. PMID 18807098. Research Blogging.
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 de Oliveira C, Watt R, Hamer M (2010). "Toothbrushing, inflammation, and risk of cardiovascular disease: results from Scottish Health Survey.". BMJ 340: c2451. DOI:10.1136/bmj.c2451. PMID 20508025. Research Blogging.
  12. ↑ Ong P, Athanasiadis A, Hill S, Vogelsberg H, Voehringer M, Sechtem U (August 2008). "Coronary artery spasm as a frequent cause of acute coronary syndrome: The CASPAR (Coronary Artery Spasm in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome) Study". J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 52 (7): 523–7. DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.04.050. PMID 18687244. Research Blogging.
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 Panting JR, Gatehouse PD, Yang GZ, et al (June 2002). "Abnormal subendocardial perfusion in cardiac syndrome X detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging". N. Engl. J. Med. 346 (25): 1948–53. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa012369. PMID 12075055. Research Blogging.
  14. ↑ Gehi AK, Ali S, Na B, Schiller NB, Whooley MA (July 2008). "Inducible ischemia and the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events in outpatients with stable coronary heart disease: the heart and soul study". Arch. Intern. Med. 168 (13): 1423–8. DOI:10.1001/archinte.168.13.1423. PMID 18625923. Research Blogging.
  15. ↑ Swap CJ, Nagurney JT (2005). "Value and limitations of chest pain history in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes". JAMA 294 (20): 2623–9. DOI:10.1001/jama.294.20.2623. PMID 16304077. Research Blogging.
  16. ↑ Diamond GA, Forrester JS (1979). "Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease.". N Engl J Med 300 (24): 1350-8. DOI:10.1056/NEJM197906143002402. PMID 440357. Research Blogging.
  17. ↑ 17.0 17.1 Weiner DA, Ryan TJ, McCabe CH, Kennedy JW, Schloss M, Tristani F et al. (1979). "Exercise stress testing. Correlations among history of angina, ST-segment response and prevalence of coronary-artery disease in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS).". N Engl J Med 301 (5): 230-5. DOI:10.1056/NEJM197908023010502. PMID 449990. Research Blogging.
  18. ↑ Pryor DB, Shaw L, McCants CB, et al (1993). "Value of the history and physical in identifying patients at increased risk for coronary artery disease". Ann. Intern. Med. 118 (2): 81–90. PMID 8416322. [e] Online calculator
  19. ↑ Pryor DB, Harrell FE, Lee KL, Califf RM, Rosati RA (1983). "Estimating the likelihood of significant coronary artery disease". Am. J. Med. 75 (5): 771–80. PMID 6638047. [e]
  20. ↑ 20.0 20.1 Garber AM, Solomon NA (May 1999). "Cost-effectiveness of alternative test strategies for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease". Ann. Intern. Med. 130 (9): 719–28. PMID 10357690. [e]
  21. ↑ Mark DB, Hlatky MA, Lee KL, Harrell FE, Califf RM, Pryor DB (January 1987). "Localizing coronary artery obstructions with the exercise treadmill test". Ann. Intern. Med. 106 (1): 53–5. PMID 3789578. [e]
  22. ↑ 22.0 22.1 Schuetz GM, Zacharopoulou NM, Schlattmann P, Dewey M (2010). "Meta-analysis: noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging.". Ann Intern Med 152 (3): 167-77. DOI:10.1059/0003-4819-152-3-201002020-00008. PMID 20124233. Research Blogging.
  23. ↑ White CJ, Jaff MR, Haskal ZJ, Jones DJ, Olin JW, Rocha-Singh KJ et al. (2006). "Indications for renal arteriography at the time of coronary arteriography: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Councils on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention and on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease.". Circulation 114 (17): 1892-5. DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.178777. PMID 17030686. Research Blogging.
  24. ↑ Helfand M, Buckley DI, Freeman M, Fu R, Rogers K, Fleming C et al. (2009). "Emerging risk factors for coronary heart disease: a summary of systematic reviews conducted for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.". Ann Intern Med 151 (7): 496-507. PMID 19805772.
  25. ↑ Greenland P, Bonow RO, Brundage BH, Budoff MJ, Eisenberg MJ, Grundy SM et al. (2007). "ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography).". Circulation 115 (3): 402-26. DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA..107.181425. PMID 17220398. Research Blogging.
  26. ↑ Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP, Doherty TM, Detrano RC (2004). "Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals.". JAMA 291 (2): 210-5. DOI:10.1001/jama.291.2.210. PMID 14722147. Research Blogging.
  27. ↑ Chaitman BR et al. Effects of ranolazine with atenolol, amlodipine, or diltiazem on exercise tolerance and angina frequency in patients with severe chronic angina: a randomized controlled trial. Combination Assessment of Ranolazine In Stable Angina (CARISA) Investigators. JAMA. 2004 Jan 21;291(3):309-16. PMID: 14734593
  28. ↑ Morrow et al; MERLIN-TIMI 36 Trial Investigators. Effects of ranolazine on recurrent cardiovascular events in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: the MERLIN-TIMI 36 randomized trial. JAMA. 2007 Apr 25;297(16):1775-83. PMID: 17456819
  29. ↑ (April 1981) "Timolol-induced reduction in mortality and reinfarction in patients surviving acute myocardial infarction". N. Engl. J. Med. 304 (14): 801–7. PMID 7010157. [e]
  30. ↑ 30.0 30.1 Wijeysundera HC, Nallamothu BK, Krumholz HM, Tu JV, Ko DT (2010). "Meta-analysis: effects of percutaneous coronary intervention versus medical therapy on angina relief.". Ann Intern Med 152 (6): 370-9. DOI:10.1059/0003-4819-152-6-201003160-00007. PMID 20231568. Research Blogging.
  31. ↑ 31.0 31.1 (March 1984) "Myocardial infarction and mortality in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS) randomized trial". N. Engl. J. Med. 310 (12): 750–8. PMID 6608052. “This is the CASS randomized controlled trial.” [e]
  32. ↑ 32.0 32.1 Bravata DM, Gienger AL, McDonald KM, et al (2007). "Systematic Review: The Comparative Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions and Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery". Ann Intern Med. PMID 17938385. [e]
  33. ↑ 33.0 33.1 Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al (April 2007). "Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease". N. Engl. J. Med. 356 (15): 1503–16. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa070829. PMID 17387127. Research Blogging. “This is the COURAGE randomized controlled trial.”
  34. ↑ Hochman JS, Lamas GA, Buller CE, Dzavik V, Reynolds HR, Abramsky SJ et al. (2006). "Coronary intervention for persistent occlusion after myocardial infarction.". N Engl J Med 355 (23): 2395-407. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa066139. PMID 17105759. PMC PMC1995554. Research Blogging.
  35. ↑ Weintraub WS, Spertus JA, Kolm P, et al (August 2008). "Effect of PCI on quality of life in patients with stable coronary disease". N. Engl. J. Med. 359 (7): 677–87. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa072771. PMID 18703470. Research Blogging. (see Table 3 in the article)
  36. ↑ Anderson HV, Shaw RE, Brindis RG, et al (November 2005). "Relationship between procedure indications and outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions by American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force Guidelines". Circulation 112 (18): 2786–91. DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.553727. PMID 16267252. Research Blogging.
  37. ↑ Mauri L, Hsieh WH, Massaro JM, Ho KK, D'Agostino R, Cutlip DE (March 2007). "Stent thrombosis in randomized clinical trials of drug-eluting stents". N. Engl. J. Med. 356 (10): 1020–9. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa067731. PMID 17296821. Research Blogging.
  38. ↑ Stone GW, Moses JW, Ellis SG, et al (March 2007). "Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents". N. Engl. J. Med. 356 (10): 998–1008. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa067193. PMID 17296824. Research Blogging.
  39. ↑ Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Pache J, et al (March 2007). "Analysis of 14 trials comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents". N. Engl. J. Med. 356 (10): 1030–9. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa067484. PMID 17296823. Research Blogging.
  40. ↑ 40.0 40.1 Detrano R, Guerci AD, Carr JJ, et al (March 2008). "Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups". N. Engl. J. Med. 358 (13): 1336–45. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa072100. PMID 18367736. Research Blogging.
  41. ↑ Weintraub WS, Diamond GA (March 2008). "Predicting cardiovascular events with coronary calcium scoring". N. Engl. J. Med. 358 (13): 1394–6. DOI:10.1056/NEJMe0800676. PMID 18367744. Research Blogging.
  42. ↑ Polonsky TS, McClelland RL, Jorgensen NW, Bild DE, Burke GL, Guerci AD et al. (2010). "Coronary artery calcium score and risk classification for coronary heart disease prediction.". JAMA 303 (16): 1610-6. DOI:10.1001/jama.2010.461. PMID 20424251. Research Blogging.
  43. ↑ 43.0 43.1 Mark DB, Shaw L, Harrell FE, et al (1991). "Prognostic value of a treadmill exercise score in outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease". N. Engl. J. Med. 325 (12): 849–53. PMID 1875969. [e]
  44. ↑ 44.0 44.1 Lauer MS, Pothier CE, Magid DJ, Smith SS, Kattan MW (2007). "An externally validated model for predicting long-term survival after exercise treadmill testing in patients with suspected coronary artery disease and a normal electrocardiogram". Ann. Intern. Med. 147 (12): 821–8. PMID 18087052. [e]
  45. ↑ 45.0 45.1 Weiner DA, Ryan TJ, McCabe CH, et al (March 1984). "Prognostic importance of a clinical profile and exercise test in medically treated patients with coronary artery disease". J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 3 (3): 772–9. PMID 6229569. [e]
  46. ↑ Mark DB, Hlatky MA, Harrell FE, Lee KL, Califf RM, Pryor DB (June 1987). "Exercise treadmill score for predicting prognosis in coronary artery disease". Ann. Intern. Med. 106 (6): 793–800. PMID 3579066. [e]
  47. ↑ 47.0 47.1 Morris CK, Morrow K, Froelicher VF, et al (June 1993). "Prediction of cardiovascular death by means of clinical and exercise test variables in patients selected for cardiac catheterization". Am. Heart J. 125 (6): 1717–26. PMID 8498316. [e]
  48. ↑ 48.0 48.1 Alderman EL, Corley SD, Fisher LD, et al (October 1993). "Five-year angiographic follow-up of factors associated with progression of coronary artery disease in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). CASS Participating Investigators and Staff". J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 22 (4): 1141–54. PMID 8409054. [e]
  49. ↑ Giroud D, Li JM, Urban P, Meier B, Rutishauer W (March 1992). "Relation of the site of acute myocardial infarction to the most severe coronary arterial stenosis at prior angiography". Am. J. Cardiol. 69 (8): 729–32. PMID 1546645. [e]
  50. ↑ Glaser R, Selzer F, Faxon DP, et al (January 2005). "Clinical progression of incidental, asymptomatic lesions discovered during culprit vessel coronary intervention". Circulation 111 (2): 143–9. DOI:10.1161/01.CIR.0000150335.01285.12. PMID 15623544. Research Blogging.
  51. ↑ 51.0 51.1 Ambrose JA, Tannenbaum MA, Alexopoulos D, et al (July 1988). "Angiographic progression of coronary artery disease and the development of myocardial infarction". J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 12 (1): 56–62. PMID 3379219. [e]
  52. ↑ Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, et al (October 2003). "From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I". Circulation 108 (14): 1664–72. DOI:10.1161/01.CIR.0000087480.94275.97. PMID 14530185. Research Blogging.
  53. ↑ Moyer VA, on behalf of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force* (2012). "Screening for Coronary Heart Disease With Electrocardiography: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.". Ann Intern Med. DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-157-7-201210020-00514. PMID 22847227. Research Blogging.

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Coronary_heart_disease&oldid=983671"