Talk:Fuzzy control: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Greg Woodhouse
(Which workgroup? - computers, I think)
imported>Giangiacomo Gerla
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = Fuzzy logic
|                cat1 = Mathematics
|                cat2 = Philosophy
|                cat3 = Computers
|          cat_check = y
|              status = 1
|        underlinked = y
|            cleanup = n
|                  by = [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 01:29, 28 June 2007 (CDT)
}}


__TOC__
__TOC__
Line 18: Line 8:


:I would say computers. The primary application of these ideas is neuro-fuzzy modeling (e.g., pattern recognition, decision making and planning, robotics, theoretical approaches to cognitive science, etc.) Fuzzy logic has not been terribly popular in the broader scientific community because it suffers from various theoretical difficulties, but others do not see these as insurmountable. It's biggest application probably comes in the areas of modeling and simulation. [[User:Greg Woodhouse|Greg Woodhouse]] 11:28, 28 June 2007 (CDT)
:I would say computers. The primary application of these ideas is neuro-fuzzy modeling (e.g., pattern recognition, decision making and planning, robotics, theoretical approaches to cognitive science, etc.) Fuzzy logic has not been terribly popular in the broader scientific community because it suffers from various theoretical difficulties, but others do not see these as insurmountable. It's biggest application probably comes in the areas of modeling and simulation. [[User:Greg Woodhouse|Greg Woodhouse]] 11:28, 28 June 2007 (CDT)
::This should go into the "Broken Optics", "Textiles", and "Electronics" workgroups.  But seriously, I think Mathematics should be the primary workgroup.  If we didn't have computers, Mathematicians would still be frustrated over ambiguous data sets.--[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 11:30, 28 June 2007 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 15:36, 15 November 2008

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  Control system based on fuzzy logic, that analyzes analog input values in terms of logical variables that take on continuous values between 0 and 1, in contrast to classical or digital logic, which operates on discrete values of either 0 and 1 (true and false). [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category:  Mathematics [Please add or review categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

Which workgroup?

Which primary workgroup does this best belong in? Stephen Ewen 02:02, 28 June 2007 (CDT)

I would say computers. The primary application of these ideas is neuro-fuzzy modeling (e.g., pattern recognition, decision making and planning, robotics, theoretical approaches to cognitive science, etc.) Fuzzy logic has not been terribly popular in the broader scientific community because it suffers from various theoretical difficulties, but others do not see these as insurmountable. It's biggest application probably comes in the areas of modeling and simulation. Greg Woodhouse 11:28, 28 June 2007 (CDT)
This should go into the "Broken Optics", "Textiles", and "Electronics" workgroups. But seriously, I think Mathematics should be the primary workgroup. If we didn't have computers, Mathematicians would still be frustrated over ambiguous data sets.--Robert W King 11:30, 28 June 2007 (CDT)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Fuzzy_control&oldid=27955"