Talk:Alexander Long: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 13:07, 10 February 2023

Main Article

Discussion

Related Articles ^[?]

Bibliography ^[?]

External Links ^[?]

Citable Version ^[?]

To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.

Definition: (1816-1886) American politician who served as a Representative from Ohio; a member of the Democratic Party, Long was one of the anti-war Copperheads who were vociferously opposed to the U.S. Civil War. [d] [e]

Checklist and Archives

Workgroup categories: Politics and History [Categories OK]
Talk Archive: none	English language variant: British English

Unused subpages
Unused subpages: - Works - Discography - Filmography - Catalogs - Timelines - Gallery - Audio - Video - Code - Tutorials - Student Level - Signed Articles - Function - Addendum - Debate Guide - Advanced - Recipes - Citable Version

Reconquer?

The phrase "reconquer the Confederate States of America" seems inappropriate here -- in a Civil War, when each set of states or territories is a part of a fractured whole (Federalist or otherwise), for either side to win would not seem to me to be for them to conquer the other! Russell Potter 21:25, 7 May 2007 (CDT)

Oh, thanks for pointing that out. "reconquer" is a little biased. But right now I can't think of a better one. Which term would you suggest? Yi Zhe Wu 21:36, 7 May 2007 (CDT)

At this point, I'd just suggest cutting the phrase "a war led by President Abraham Lincoln to reconquer the Confederate States of America, a confederacy of eleven Southern states that seceded from the Union" since the wikilink to American Civil War will take care of that; the appositive phrase isn't needed. Russell Potter 21:40, 7 May 2007 (CDT)

Done. Also I added some explanation to copperheads, if anyone think it's redundant feel free to delete that one as well. Thanks! Yi Zhe Wu 21:42, 7 May 2007 (CDT)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{subpages}}
 ==Reconquer?==
 The phrase "reconquer the Confederate States of America" seems inappropriate here -- in a ''Civil'' War, when each set of states or territories is a part of a fractured whole (Federalist or otherwise), for either side to win would not seem to me to be for them to ''conquer'' the other!  [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 21:25, 7 May 2007 (CDT)
 :Oh, thanks for pointing that out. "reconquer" is a little biased. But right now I can't think of a better one. Which term would you suggest? [[User:Yi Zhe Wu|Yi Zhe Wu]] 21:36, 7 May 2007 (CDT)
-::At this point, I'd just suggest cutting the phrase "a war led by President Abraham Lincoln to reconquer the Confederate States of America, a confederacy of eleven Southern states that seceded from the Union" since the wikilink to [[Civil War]] will take care of that; the appositive phrase isn't needed.  [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 21:40, 7 May 2007 (CDT)
+::At this point, I'd just suggest cutting the phrase "a war led by President Abraham Lincoln to reconquer the Confederate States of America, a confederacy of eleven Southern states that seceded from the Union" since the wikilink to [[American Civil War]] will take care of that; the appositive phrase isn't needed.  [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 21:40, 7 May 2007 (CDT)
+:::Done. Also I added some explanation to copperheads, if anyone think it's redundant feel free to delete that one as well. Thanks! [[User:Yi Zhe Wu|Yi Zhe Wu]] 21:42, 7 May 2007 (CDT)

Talk:Alexander Long: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 13:07, 10 February 2023

Reconquer?

Navigation menu

Search