Bra-ket notation: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Michael Underwood
mNo edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Bra-ket''' or '''bracket''' (or even '''bra-c-ket''') '''notation''' was formulated by [[Dirac]]<ref>TODO: Cite Dirac's original work</ref> to provide a concise method for performing and describing the [[linear algebra]] used throughout the [[matrix mechanics]] formulation of [[quantum mechanics]].
{{subpages}}
 
'''Bra-ket''' or '''bracket''' (or even '''bra-c-ket''') '''notation''' was formulated by [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1933/dirac.html Dirac]<ref>P. A. M. Dirac, ''The Principles of Quantum Mechanics'', Oxford University Press (1930). Fourth edition 1958. Paperback 1981. </ref> to provide a concise method for performing and describing the [[linear algebra]] used throughout the [[matrix mechanics]] formulation of [[quantum mechanics]].
The notation is in wide use in the field today, and although developed with quantum mechanics in mind it can be employed more generally when working with any [[vector space]].
The notation is in wide use in the field today, and although developed with quantum mechanics in mind it can be employed more generally when working with any [[vector space]].
In this notation [[vector]]s are represented by '''kets''', such as <math>|\psi\rangle</math>, while their corresponding [[dual vector]]s are given by '''bras''', <math>\langle\psi|</math>.
In this notation [[vector]]s are represented by '''kets''', such as <math>|\psi\rangle</math>, while their corresponding [[dual vector]]s are given by '''bras''', <math>\langle\psi|</math>.
Line 18: Line 20:
</math>,
</math>,
where <math>\alpha=\langle\cdot|\cdot\rangle\in F</math> is a scalar.
where <math>\alpha=\langle\cdot|\cdot\rangle\in F</math> is a scalar.
The convention of dropping duplicated vertical bars in an expression as we have done here (i.e. writing
By convention, duplicated vertical bars in an expression are dropped as we have done here (i.e. writing
<math>\langle\cdot|\cdot\rangle</math> instead of <math>\langle\cdot||\cdot\rangle</math>).
<math>\langle\cdot|\cdot\rangle</math> instead of <math>\langle\cdot||\cdot\rangle</math>).


Line 52: Line 54:


==References==
==References==
<references/>
<references/>[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]]
[[Category:CZ Live]]
[[Category:Physics Workgroup]]

Latest revision as of 16:01, 20 July 2024

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Bra-ket or bracket (or even bra-c-ket) notation was formulated by Dirac[1] to provide a concise method for performing and describing the linear algebra used throughout the matrix mechanics formulation of quantum mechanics. The notation is in wide use in the field today, and although developed with quantum mechanics in mind it can be employed more generally when working with any vector space. In this notation vectors are represented by kets, such as , while their corresponding dual vectors are given by bras, . In the context of quantum mechanics the state of a system corresponds to a vector in a Hilbert space, so the state is analogous to the wave function .

Mathematical description

Let be a Hilbert space and its dual space (which is isomorphic to if the space is finite-dimensional). Elements of are then labelled by kets and elements of are labelled by bras. Together a bra and a ket can form a Dirac bracket, , which is equal to the inner product between them. The bracket then is a map from to a field (in quantum mechanics the field is the complex numbers, ).

When the order of the bra and ket is reversed the resulting object is an operator, sometimes called a ket-bra, . This operator is given by the outer product of the ket with the bra, and is a map from onto itself since , where is a scalar. By convention, duplicated vertical bars in an expression are dropped as we have done here (i.e. writing instead of ).

Uses in quantum mechanics

Suppose that corresponds to the state space for a quantum system. For example, if the system was a particle in a box then would contain every possible state that the particle could occupy. Now let the state of the system be , with normalized (that is, ) and let be an operator corresponding to the observable .

Expectation value

The expected result of a measurement of is given by .

Overlap and probability

The overlap between the state of the system and another state is , which means that the probability of finding the system in state is given by . This can also be seen as the expectation value of the projection operator , since this yields

Resolution of the identity

If the states are the (normalized) eigenstates of then the identity operator can be expressed as

.

This result holds if the are any complete set of orthonormal vectors, which is guaranteed to be the case for the eigenvectors of a Hermitean matrix.

References

  1. P. A. M. Dirac, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, Oxford University Press (1930). Fourth edition 1958. Paperback 1981.