Talk:Microsoft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Pat Palmer
(category check OK)
imported>Pat Palmer
(I don't think anyone is actively working on this at the moment)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = Microsoft Corporation
 
|                cat1 = Computers
NOTE: The <code><nowiki>{{editintro}}</nowiki></code> template atop the article page should be removed prior approval.
|                cat2 =  
 
|                cat3 =  
<!--  DO NOT ARCHIVE ABOVE THIS LINE -->
|          cat_check = n
== entry under active development? ==
|              status = 3
Is anyone currently working on the development of this entry? [[User:Ewan Nisbet|Ewan Nisbet]] 05:05, 1 January 2008 (CST)
|         underlinked = y
 
|            cleanup = y
:I don't believe anyone is.  It could use work, but I would not like to see us take the same approach as Wikipedia.  I think we should write our own perspective.  I have some thoughts to add to it, but no time today.  Maybe soon.  If interested, please go at it![[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 18:30, 6 January 2008 (CST)
|                  by = --[[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] 15:19, 5 April 2007 (CDT)
}}

Latest revision as of 18:30, 6 January 2008

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A computer software company founded in 1975 by Bill Gates and Paul Allen. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Computers [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

NOTE: The {{editintro}} template atop the article page should be removed prior approval.

entry under active development?

Is anyone currently working on the development of this entry? Ewan Nisbet 05:05, 1 January 2008 (CST)

I don't believe anyone is. It could use work, but I would not like to see us take the same approach as Wikipedia. I think we should write our own perspective. I have some thoughts to add to it, but no time today. Maybe soon. If interested, please go at it!Pat Palmer 18:30, 6 January 2008 (CST)