User:Marielle Fields Newsome: Difference between revisions
imported>Marielle Fields Newsome (→To Do) |
No edit summary |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{AccountNotLive}} | |||
[[Category:CZ Authors|Fields Newsome, Marielle]] | [[Category:CZ Authors|Fields Newsome, Marielle]] | ||
[[Category:Visual Arts Authors|Fields Newsome, Marielle]] | [[Category:Visual Arts Authors|Fields Newsome, Marielle]] | ||
Line 8: | Line 5: | ||
==Current Projects== | ==Current Projects== | ||
===The Official Box=== | |||
{{Userplan-all|Marielle Fields Newsome}} | {{Userplan-all|Marielle Fields Newsome}} | ||
Line 19: | Line 16: | ||
{| align=center style="width:70%; border: solid 3px lightblue; padding: 3px;" | {| align=center style="width:70%; border: solid 3px lightblue; padding: 3px;" | ||
|- | |- | ||
|<center> | |<center>{{Image|Writing_amoeba.png|center|55px|Hi! I'm an amoeba and I write Citizendium articles. So can you!}} <BIG>'''[[CZ:Biology_Workgroup|Biology Week]] is on!</BIG><br />''Join us this week, September 22-28'''''<br> | ||
You're invited to work on '''[[CZ:Biology_Workgroup#High_priority_articles|high priority articles]]''', or simply start a [[CZ:Start_Article|new one]]! <br>It's a '''[[CZ:Workgroup_Weeks|Workgroup Week]]'''. If an amoeba can participate, '''''so can you!''''' | You're invited to work on '''[[CZ:Biology_Workgroup#High_priority_articles|high priority articles]]''', or simply start a [[CZ:Start_Article|new one]]! <br>It's a '''[[CZ:Workgroup_Weeks|Workgroup Week]]'''. If an amoeba can participate, '''''so can you!''''' | ||
('''Are you new?''' This is a good day to get a [[CZ:Quick Start|Quick Start]].)</center> | ('''Are you new?''' This is a good day to get a [[CZ:Quick Start|Quick Start]].)</center> | ||
Line 34: | Line 31: | ||
|colspan=2| | |colspan=2| | ||
{|width=95% align="center" style="border: 1px solid darkblue; background-color:lightblue" cellpadding=0 | {|width=95% align="center" style="border: 1px solid darkblue; background-color:lightblue" cellpadding=0 | ||
| [[Image: | | [[Image:Banner4.png|750px]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
{{Workgroup|group=Biology}} | {{Workgroup|group=Biology}} | ||
Line 40: | Line 37: | ||
===Taxonomy=== | ===Taxonomy=== | ||
Insect classification, like much of taxonomy, has been going through rather dramatic changes recently. The most complete source for up-to-date classification seems to be [http://www.itis.gov/ ITIS]. As such, I've decided that the site will be my final authority on taxonomy. I notice that Wikipedia uses more recent material in their classification, but I'm hesitant to do that, mostly because taxonomy is often interdependent, and one paper does not a new order make. | Insect classification, like much of taxonomy, has been going through rather dramatic changes recently. The most complete source for up-to-date classification seems to be [http://www.itis.gov/ ITIS]. As such, I've decided that the site will be my final authority on taxonomy. I notice that Wikipedia uses more recent material in their classification, but I'm hesitant to do that, mostly because taxonomy is often interdependent, and one paper does not a new order make. | ||
[[User:Marielle Fields Newsome|Marielle Fields Newsome]] 16:59, 4 June 2008 (CDT) | [[User:Marielle Fields Newsome|Marielle Fields Newsome]] 16:59, 4 June 2008 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 03:18, 22 November 2023
The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.
Current Projects
The Official Box
Biology Workweek Mock-upsMain pageHere's the .svg, if anyone wants to work on it. I think the rest of the pencil needs shading, and maybe the amoeba needs to pop more.
Workgroup PageIf someone wants to format this better, that would be great. Also, the banner design is still a work in progress. Suggestions are very welcome. Marielle Fields Newsome 11:36, 8 June 2008 (CDT)
|
Taxonomy
Insect classification, like much of taxonomy, has been going through rather dramatic changes recently. The most complete source for up-to-date classification seems to be ITIS. As such, I've decided that the site will be my final authority on taxonomy. I notice that Wikipedia uses more recent material in their classification, but I'm hesitant to do that, mostly because taxonomy is often interdependent, and one paper does not a new order make. Marielle Fields Newsome 16:59, 4 June 2008 (CDT)