Talk:United States Constitution: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Steve Mount
imported>Aleksander Stos
(now redirect, does not need a checklist)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{
=="Main Article"==
It is common on Wikipedia to do as I've done on this page and have "Main Article blah blah" for something treated from a high level, like Article 1.  Any opinions on whether it is better to create a "main article" to discuss Article 1 in more detail, or to discuss it in more detail on this page? [[User:Steve Mount|steve802]] 22:54, 1 April 2007 (CDT)
==Dates==
==Dates==


I guess this is less a question about this article than it is about CZ in general - it is common Wikipedia practice to linkify dates and years. Is this discouraged in CZ?  Also, is there a standard date format?  I see some in this article were added as DD MMM YYYY, and some of my original entries are in MMM DD, YYYY format.  ([[User:Steve Mount|steve802]] 12:16, 2 March 2007 (CST))
I guess this is less a question about this article than it is about CZ in general - it is common Wikipedia practice to linkify dates and years. Is this discouraged in CZ?  Also, is there a standard date format?  I see some in this article were added as DD MMM YYYY, and some of my original entries are in MMM DD, YYYY format.  ([[User:Steve Mount|steve802]] 12:16, 2 March 2007 (CST))

Latest revision as of 15:46, 30 June 2007

{

"Main Article"

It is common on Wikipedia to do as I've done on this page and have "Main Article blah blah" for something treated from a high level, like Article 1. Any opinions on whether it is better to create a "main article" to discuss Article 1 in more detail, or to discuss it in more detail on this page? steve802 22:54, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

Dates

I guess this is less a question about this article than it is about CZ in general - it is common Wikipedia practice to linkify dates and years. Is this discouraged in CZ? Also, is there a standard date format? I see some in this article were added as DD MMM YYYY, and some of my original entries are in MMM DD, YYYY format. (steve802 12:16, 2 March 2007 (CST))