Talk:Journal of Neuroendocrinology: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
{{WPauthor|Disclaimer: | |||
Actually this article was written here and copied to Wikipedia by David. The WP disclaimer should therefore be eliminated|[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 08:56, 17 April 2007 (CDT)}} | |||
Surely we don't need the quotation marks in the title...? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 12:45, 29 November 2006 (CST) | Surely we don't need the quotation marks in the title...? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 12:45, 29 November 2006 (CST) | ||
aargh. How do I get rid of them? [[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 04:28, 30 November 2006 (CST) | |||
Most of this is a close paraphrase or copy from the journal, and needs to be rewritten in an encyclopedic style. | |||
I am having a try at it. [[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 20:23, 7 December 2006 (CST) | |||
And I did it, too. This is what I think is the appropriate amount of detail, although the specifics of peer review should probably be condensed a little further. I left them in for now as a model. [[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 21:45, 7 December 2006 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:30, 4 November 2007
 |
NOTICE, please do not remove from top of page. |
| Disclaimer:
Actually this article was written here and copied to Wikipedia by David. The WP disclaimer should therefore be eliminated | |
| Gareth Leng 08:56, 17 April 2007 (CDT) |
Surely we don't need the quotation marks in the title...? --Larry Sanger 12:45, 29 November 2006 (CST)
aargh. How do I get rid of them? Gareth Leng 04:28, 30 November 2006 (CST)
Most of this is a close paraphrase or copy from the journal, and needs to be rewritten in an encyclopedic style. I am having a try at it. DavidGoodman 20:23, 7 December 2006 (CST) And I did it, too. This is what I think is the appropriate amount of detail, although the specifics of peer review should probably be condensed a little further. I left them in for now as a model. DavidGoodman 21:45, 7 December 2006 (CST)