Tuskegee Syphilis Study: Difference between revisions
imported>Michael Benjamin (Yes it's an import, but it's a good article that covers the story fairly and broadly) |
mNo edit summary |
||
(14 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TOC right}} | {{subpages}} | ||
{{TOC|right}} | |||
'''The Tuskegee Syphilis Study,''' (1932–1972), and the [[Public Health Service]] [[Syphilis]] Study or the Tuskegee Experiments was a [[clinical trial|clinical study]], conducted around [[Tuskegee, Alabama]], where 399 (plus 200 control group without syphilis) poor -- and mostly illiterate -- [[African American]] [[sharecroppers]] became part of a study on the treatment and normal progression of [[syphilis]]. | |||
This study became notorious because it was conducted without [[due care]] to its subjects, and led to major changes in how patients are protected in clinical studies. Individuals enrolled in the Tuskegee Syphilis Study did not give [[informed consent]] and were not informed of their diagnosis; instead they were told they had "bad blood" and could receive free treatment, a free ride to the clinic, one hot meal per day, and, in the event of death, $35 (later raised to $50) for the funeral. | |||
By 1947, [[penicillin]] had become the standard treatment for syphilis. Prior to this discovery, syphilis frequently led to a chronic, painful and fatal multisystem disease. Rather than treat all syphilitic subjects with penicillin and close the study, the Tuskegee scientists withheld penicillin or information about penicillin, purely to continue to study how the disease spreads and kills. Participants were also prevented from accessing syphilis treatment programs that were available to other people in the area. The study continued until 1972, when a leak to the press resulted in its termination. | |||
The Tuskegee Syphilis Study is often cited as one of the greatest ethical breaches of trust between physicians and patients in the setting of a clinical study in the [[United States of America|United States]]. The Tuskegee Syphilis Study led to the 1979 [[Belmont Report]], the establishment of the [[National Human Investigation Board]], and the requirement for establishment of [[Institutional Review Board]]s. | |||
The Tuskegee Syphilis Study is often cited as one of the greatest ethical breaches of trust between physicians and patients in the setting of a clinical study in the [[United States]]. | |||
==Study clinicians== | ==Study clinicians== | ||
The study group was formed as part of the [[venereal disease]] section of the [[U.S. Public Health Service]] (PHS). The start of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study is most commonly attributed to Dr. [[Taliaferro Clark]]. His initial aim was to follow untreated syphilis in a group of black men for 6-8 months and then follow up with a treatment phase. | |||
The study group was formed as part of the [[venereal disease]] section of the [[U.S. Public Health Service]] (PHS). The start of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study is most commonly attributed to Dr. [[Taliaferro Clark]]. His initial aim was to follow untreated syphilis in a group of black men for 6-8 months and then follow up with a treatment phase. | |||
Dr. [[Oliver C. Wenger]] was director of the PHS Venereal Disease Clinic in [[Hot Springs, Arkansas|Hot Springs]], [[Arkansas (U.S. state)]]. He was an enthusiastic supporter of mass screening for syphilis and mass treatment programs in the black community. At various stages of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, Wenger was attached to the [[Macon County, Alabama]] activities, and he played a critical role in developing early study protocols. Wenger continued to advise and assist the Tuskegee Study when it turned into a long term, no-treatment observational study. He consistently supported a policy of concealing the aims of the study from the subjects - he feared that full disclosure would lead to their non-cooperation. | |||
Dr. | In 1932, Dr. Taliaffero Clark was the director of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. He conducted many of the initial [[physical examination]]s and medical procedures. Raymond Vonderlehr developed the policies that shaped the next stage of the project. For example, he decided to gain the "[[informed consent|consent]]" of the subjects for [[lumbar puncture|spinal tap]]s (to look for signs of [[syphilis|neurosyphilis]]) by depicting the diagnostic tests as a "special free treatment." Dr. Wenger subsequently congratulated him for his "flair for framing letters to negros." Vonderlehr retired as head of the venereal disease section in 1943. | ||
John Heller's leadership coincided with the years when penicillin was introduced in other PHS clinics as routine treatment for syphilis, and when the [[Nuremberg Code]] was formulated (to protect the rights of research subjects). The study was brought to public attention in 1972; Heller defended the [[medical ethics|ethics]] of the study. | |||
Nurse [[Eunice Rivers]] was an [[African American]] [[nurse]] who trained at Tuskegee and was recruited from the [[John Andrew Hospital]] when the study began. Dr. Vonderlehr became a strong advocate for her role. As the study became a constant fixture within the PHS, Nurse Rivers became the chief continuity person and was the only staff person to work with the study for all 40 years of its existence. By the 1950s, Nurse Rivers had become pivotal to the study—her personal knowledge of all the subjects allowed the very long follow up to be maintained. | Nurse [[Eunice Rivers]] was an [[African American]] [[nurse]] who trained at Tuskegee and was recruited from the [[John Andrew Hospital]] when the study began. Dr. Vonderlehr became a strong advocate for her role. As the study became a constant fixture within the PHS, Nurse Rivers became the chief continuity person and was the only staff person to work with the study for all 40 years of its existence. By the 1950s, Nurse Rivers had become pivotal to the study—her personal knowledge of all the subjects allowed the very long follow up to be maintained. | ||
Line 25: | Line 22: | ||
==Study details== | ==Study details== | ||
The study was originally begun as a [[clinical trial|study]] of the incidence of syphilis in the Macon County population. A subject would be studied for six to eight months, then treated with contemporary treatments (including [[Arsphenamine|Salvarsan]], [[mercury (element)|mercurial]] ointments and [[bismuth]]) which were somewhat effective, but quite toxic. The initial intentions of the study were to benefit public health in this poor population as evidenced by participation from the [[Tuskegee Institute]], the Black university founded by [[Booker T. Washington]]. Its affiliated [[hospital]] lent the PHS its medical facilities for the study, and other predominantly black institutions as well as local black doctors also participated. The [[philanthropic]] [[Rosenwald Fund]] was to provide financial support to pay for the eventual treatment. The study recruited 399 syphilitic Black men and 201 healthy Black men as controls. | The study was originally begun as a [[clinical trial|study]] of the incidence of syphilis in the Macon County population. A subject would be studied for six to eight months, then treated with contemporary treatments (including [[Arsphenamine|Salvarsan]], [[mercury (element)|mercurial]] ointments and [[bismuth]]) which were somewhat effective, but quite toxic. The initial intentions of the study were to benefit public health in this poor population as evidenced by participation from the [[Tuskegee Institute]], the Black university founded by [[Booker T. Washington]]. Its affiliated [[hospital]] lent the PHS its medical facilities for the study, and other predominantly black institutions as well as local black doctors also participated. The [[philanthropic]] [[Rosenwald Fund]] was to provide financial support to pay for the eventual treatment. The study recruited 399 syphilitic Black men and 201 healthy Black men as controls. | ||
The first critical turning point in the Tuskegee Syphilis Study came in 1929 when the [[Wall Street Crash 1929|Stock Market Crash of 1929]] led the Rosenwald Fund to withdraw its funding. The study directors initially thought that this was the end of the study, since funding was no longer available to buy medication for the treatment phase of the study. A final report was issued. | The first critical turning point in the Tuskegee Syphilis Study came in 1929 when the [[Wall Street Crash 1929|Stock Market Crash of 1929]] led the Rosenwald Fund to withdraw its funding. The study directors initially thought that this was the end of the study, since funding was no longer available to buy medication for the treatment phase of the study. A final report was issued. | ||
In 1928, the Oslo Study had reported on the [[pathology|pathologic]] manifestations of untreated syphilis in several hundred white males. This study was a [[retrospective study]]; investigators pieced together information from patients that had already contracted syphilis and had remained untreated for some time. The Tuskegee study group decided to salvage their study | In 1928, the Oslo Study had reported on the [[pathology|pathologic]] manifestations of untreated syphilis in several hundred white males. This study was a [[retrospective study]]; investigators pieced together information from patients that had already contracted syphilis and had remained untreated for some time. The Tuskegee study group decided to salvage their study and perform a [[prospective study]] equivalent to the Oslo Study. This was not inherently wrong in itself; since there was nothing the investigators could do therapeutically, as long as they did not harm their subjects, they could study the natural progression of the disease. They reasoned that this would be of benefit to humankind. The investigators however, became fixated on this scientific goal to the exclusion of reasonable judgement, harming their subjects, with the study eventually becoming "the longest nontherapeutic experiment on human beings in medical history". | ||
[[Medical ethics|Ethical]] considerations, poor from the start, rapidly deteriorated. For example, in the middle of the study, to ensure that the men would show up for a possibly dangerous diagnostic (non-therapeutic) [[Lumbar puncture|spinal tap]], the doctors sent the 400 patients a misleading letter titled, "Last Chance for Special Free Treatment" (see insert). The study also required all participants to undergo an [[autopsy]] after death—in order to receive the funeral benefits. For many participants, treatment was intentionally denied. Many patients were lied to and given [[placebo]] treatments—in order to observe the fatal progression of the disease. In 1934, the first clinical data was published, with the first major report being released in 1936. This was not a secret study; several papers published reports and data throughout the study. | |||
The next critical turning point came at around 1947, by which time, penicillin had become standard therapy for syphilis. Several U.S. Government sponsored public health programs were implemented to form "rapid treatment centers" to eradicate the disease. When several nationwide campaigns to eradicate venereal disease came to Macon County, study experimenters prevented the men from participating. During [[World War II]], 250 of the men registered for the [[Conscription|draft]] and were consequently diagnosed and ordered to obtain treatment for syphilis; however then the PHS prevented them getting treatment. The PHS representative, Dr. Smith,at the time is quoted: "So far, we are keeping the known positive patients from getting treatment." | |||
The next critical turning point came at around | |||
By the end of the study, only 74 of the test subjects were still alive. Twenty-eight of the men had died directly of syphilis, 100 were dead of related complications, 40 of their wives had been infected, and 19 of their children had been born with [[syphilis|congenital syphilis]]. | By the end of the study, only 74 of the test subjects were still alive. Twenty-eight of the men had died directly of syphilis, 100 were dead of related complications, 40 of their wives had been infected, and 19 of their children had been born with [[syphilis|congenital syphilis]]. | ||
==Study termination and aftermath== | ==Study termination and aftermath== | ||
In 1966, Peter Buxtun, a PHS venereal disease investigator in [[San Francisco, California]], sent a letter to the director of the Division of Venereal Diseases to express his concerns about the [[morality]] of the experiment. The [[Center for Disease Control]] (CDC) reaffirmed the need to continue the study until completion (until all subjects had died and had been autopsied). To bolster its position, the CDC sought and gained support for the continuation of the study from the local chapters of the [[National Medical Association]] (representing African-American physicians) and the [[American Medical Association]]. | |||
With his concerns rebuked, Peter Buxtun went to the press. The story broke first in the ''[[Washington Star]]'' on [[July 25]], 1972, then became front page news in the ''[[New York Times]]'' the following day. As a result of public outcry, in 1972, an ''[[ad hoc]]'' advisory panel was appointed which determined the study was medically unjustified and ordered the termination of the study. As part of a settlement of a [[class action lawsuit]] subsequently filed by [[National Association for the Advancement of Colored People|NAACP]], 9 million dollars and the promise of free medical treatment was given to surviving participants and surviving family members who had been infected as a consequence of the study. | |||
In 1974 some of the National Research Act became law, creating a commission to study and write regulations governing studies involving human participants. On [[May 16]], 1997, with five of the eight remaining survivors of the study attending the [[White House]] ceremony, President [[Bill Clinton]] formally apologized to Tuskegee study participants: "What was done cannot be undone, but we can end the silence ... We can stop turning our heads away. We can look at you in the eye, and finally say, on behalf of the American people, what the United States government did was shameful and I am sorry." | |||
In | |||
Infamous examples of real racism in the past such as Tuskegee Syphilis Study (1932-1972) have injured the level of trust in the Black community towards public health efforts. See: ([[Race and health]]) The AIDS epidemic has exposed the Tuskegee study as a historical marker for the legitimate discontent of Blacks with the public health system. The belief that AIDS is a form of genocide is rooted in recent experiences of racism. These theories range from the belief that the government promotes drug abuse in Black communities to the belief that HIV is a manmade weapon of racial warfare. Researchers in public health hope that open and honest conversations about racism in the past can help rebuild trust and improve the health of people in these communities. <ref>''The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, 1932 to 1972: implications for HIV education and AIDS risk education programs in the black community.'' Am J Public Health. 1991 November; 81(11): 1498–1505.</ref> | Infamous examples of real racism in the past such as Tuskegee Syphilis Study (1932-1972) have injured the level of trust in the Black community towards public health efforts. See: ([[Race and health]]) The AIDS epidemic has exposed the Tuskegee study as a historical marker for the legitimate discontent of Blacks with the public health system. The belief that AIDS is a form of genocide is rooted in recent experiences of racism. These theories range from the belief that the government promotes drug abuse in Black communities to the belief that HIV is a manmade weapon of racial warfare. Researchers in public health hope that open and honest conversations about racism in the past can help rebuild trust and improve the health of people in these communities. <ref>''The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, 1932 to 1972: implications for HIV education and AIDS risk education programs in the black community.'' Am J Public Health. 1991 November; 81(11): 1498–1505.</ref> | ||
Line 57: | Line 45: | ||
The early ethics of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study may be considered in isolation at study inception. In 1932, treatments for syphilis were relatively ineffective and had severe side effects. It was known that syphilis was particularly prevalent in poor, black communities. The intention of the Study was in part to measure the prevalence of the disease, to study its natural history and the real effectiveness of treatment. Prevailing medical ethics at the time did not have the exacting standards for [[informed consent]] currently expected; doctors routinely withheld information about patients' condition from them. A [[clinical study]] to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment of this then terrible disease was not inherently wrong. However, this study exploited a vulnerable sub-population to answer a question which would have been of benefit to the whole population. This was, some argue, a manifestation of [[racism]] on the part of the study organizers. | The early ethics of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study may be considered in isolation at study inception. In 1932, treatments for syphilis were relatively ineffective and had severe side effects. It was known that syphilis was particularly prevalent in poor, black communities. The intention of the Study was in part to measure the prevalence of the disease, to study its natural history and the real effectiveness of treatment. Prevailing medical ethics at the time did not have the exacting standards for [[informed consent]] currently expected; doctors routinely withheld information about patients' condition from them. A [[clinical study]] to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment of this then terrible disease was not inherently wrong. However, this study exploited a vulnerable sub-population to answer a question which would have been of benefit to the whole population. This was, some argue, a manifestation of [[racism]] on the part of the study organizers. | ||
However, with the development of an effective, simple treatment for syphilis (i.e. penicillin), and changing ethical standards, the ethical and moral judgements became absolutely indefensible. By the time the study had closed, hundreds of men had died from syphilis and many of their wives had become infected and their children born with [[syphilis|congenital syphilis]]. This study has become synonymous with [[exploitation]] in clinical studies, and has been compared with the experimentation of the [[Nazism|Nazi]] | However, with the development of an effective, simple treatment for syphilis (i.e. penicillin), and changing ethical standards, the ethical and moral judgements became absolutely indefensible. By the time the study had closed, hundreds of men had died from syphilis and many of their wives had become infected and their children born with [[syphilis|congenital syphilis]]. This study has become synonymous with [[exploitation]] in clinical studies, and has been compared with the nonconsensual experimentation of the [[Nazism|Nazi]] physicians.<ref name=Lifton>{{citation | ||
| title = The Nazi Doctors | |||
| author = Robert Jay Lifton | |||
| url = http://www.holocaust-history.org/lifton/contents.shtml | |||
| publisher = Basic Books (also now online) | year = 2000}}</ref> | |||
Sociological studies have shown that the Tuskegee Syphilis Study has predisposed many African Americans to distrust medical and public health authorities. The Study is likely a significant factor in the low participation of African Americans in clinical trials and [[organ donation]] efforts and in the reluctance of many Black people to seek routine [[preventive care]]<ref>http://www.cnn.com/2007/HEALTH/02/07/bone.marrow/index.html</ref>. | Sociological studies have shown that the Tuskegee Syphilis Study has predisposed many African Americans to distrust medical and public health authorities. The Study is likely a significant factor in the low participation of African Americans in clinical trials and [[organ donation]] efforts and in the reluctance of many Black people to seek routine [[preventive care]]<ref>http://www.cnn.com/2007/HEALTH/02/07/bone.marrow/index.html</ref>. | ||
Line 64: | Line 56: | ||
==Dramatizations== | ==Dramatizations== | ||
Dr. [[David Feldshuh]] wrote a [[stage play]] in | Dr. [[David Feldshuh]] wrote a [[stage play]] in 1992 based on the history of the Tuskegee study, titled ''[[Miss Evers' Boys]]''. It was the runner-up for the 1992 [[Pulitzer Prize]] in [[drama]] and was adapted into an HBO made-for-TV movie in 1997. The adaptation was nominated for twelve [[Emmy Award]]s [http://www.news.cornell.edu/Chronicle/97/9.11.97/Emmys.html], winning in five categories.<ref>{{cite web|title=''Miss Evers' Boys'' (1997): Awards and Nominations|url=http://www.emmys.com/shows/miss-evers-boys|publisher=Academy of Television Arts & Sciences|accessdate=24 October 2013}}</ref> | ||
[[Frank Zappa]]'s musical [[Thing-Fish]] is loosely inspired by the events. | [[Frank Zappa]]'s musical ''[[Thing-Fish]]'' is loosely inspired by the events. | ||
The [[graphic novel]] ''[[Truth: Red, White and Black]]'' tells the story of black servicemen injected with the prototype "Super Soldier Serum" that would later be perfected to turn Steve Rogers into [[Captain America]]. The testing of the drug on black servicemen was inspired by the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. | The [[graphic novel]] ''[[Truth: Red, White and Black]]'' tells the story of black servicemen injected with the prototype "Super Soldier Serum" that would later be perfected to turn Steve Rogers into [[Captain America]]. The testing of the drug on black servicemen was inspired by the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | |||
[[Category: | [[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] | ||
Latest revision as of 06:01, 31 October 2024
- The content on this page originated on Wikipedia and is yet to be significantly improved. Contributors are invited to replace and add material to make this an original article.
The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, (1932–1972), and the Public Health Service Syphilis Study or the Tuskegee Experiments was a clinical study, conducted around Tuskegee, Alabama, where 399 (plus 200 control group without syphilis) poor -- and mostly illiterate -- African American sharecroppers became part of a study on the treatment and normal progression of syphilis.
This study became notorious because it was conducted without due care to its subjects, and led to major changes in how patients are protected in clinical studies. Individuals enrolled in the Tuskegee Syphilis Study did not give informed consent and were not informed of their diagnosis; instead they were told they had "bad blood" and could receive free treatment, a free ride to the clinic, one hot meal per day, and, in the event of death, $35 (later raised to $50) for the funeral.
By 1947, penicillin had become the standard treatment for syphilis. Prior to this discovery, syphilis frequently led to a chronic, painful and fatal multisystem disease. Rather than treat all syphilitic subjects with penicillin and close the study, the Tuskegee scientists withheld penicillin or information about penicillin, purely to continue to study how the disease spreads and kills. Participants were also prevented from accessing syphilis treatment programs that were available to other people in the area. The study continued until 1972, when a leak to the press resulted in its termination.
The Tuskegee Syphilis Study is often cited as one of the greatest ethical breaches of trust between physicians and patients in the setting of a clinical study in the United States. The Tuskegee Syphilis Study led to the 1979 Belmont Report, the establishment of the National Human Investigation Board, and the requirement for establishment of Institutional Review Boards.
Study clinicians
The study group was formed as part of the venereal disease section of the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS). The start of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study is most commonly attributed to Dr. Taliaferro Clark. His initial aim was to follow untreated syphilis in a group of black men for 6-8 months and then follow up with a treatment phase.
Dr. Oliver C. Wenger was director of the PHS Venereal Disease Clinic in Hot Springs, Arkansas (U.S. state). He was an enthusiastic supporter of mass screening for syphilis and mass treatment programs in the black community. At various stages of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, Wenger was attached to the Macon County, Alabama activities, and he played a critical role in developing early study protocols. Wenger continued to advise and assist the Tuskegee Study when it turned into a long term, no-treatment observational study. He consistently supported a policy of concealing the aims of the study from the subjects - he feared that full disclosure would lead to their non-cooperation.
In 1932, Dr. Taliaffero Clark was the director of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. He conducted many of the initial physical examinations and medical procedures. Raymond Vonderlehr developed the policies that shaped the next stage of the project. For example, he decided to gain the "consent" of the subjects for spinal taps (to look for signs of neurosyphilis) by depicting the diagnostic tests as a "special free treatment." Dr. Wenger subsequently congratulated him for his "flair for framing letters to negros." Vonderlehr retired as head of the venereal disease section in 1943. John Heller's leadership coincided with the years when penicillin was introduced in other PHS clinics as routine treatment for syphilis, and when the Nuremberg Code was formulated (to protect the rights of research subjects). The study was brought to public attention in 1972; Heller defended the ethics of the study.
Nurse Eunice Rivers was an African American nurse who trained at Tuskegee and was recruited from the John Andrew Hospital when the study began. Dr. Vonderlehr became a strong advocate for her role. As the study became a constant fixture within the PHS, Nurse Rivers became the chief continuity person and was the only staff person to work with the study for all 40 years of its existence. By the 1950s, Nurse Rivers had become pivotal to the study—her personal knowledge of all the subjects allowed the very long follow up to be maintained.
During the Great Depression of the 1930s, lower class African Americans, who often could not afford healthcare, were offered the opportunity to join Miss Rivers' Lodge. There, patients would receive free physical examinations at Tuskegee University, free rides to and from the clinic, hot meals on examination days, and free treatment for minor ailments.
Study details
The study was originally begun as a study of the incidence of syphilis in the Macon County population. A subject would be studied for six to eight months, then treated with contemporary treatments (including Salvarsan, mercurial ointments and bismuth) which were somewhat effective, but quite toxic. The initial intentions of the study were to benefit public health in this poor population as evidenced by participation from the Tuskegee Institute, the Black university founded by Booker T. Washington. Its affiliated hospital lent the PHS its medical facilities for the study, and other predominantly black institutions as well as local black doctors also participated. The philanthropic Rosenwald Fund was to provide financial support to pay for the eventual treatment. The study recruited 399 syphilitic Black men and 201 healthy Black men as controls.
The first critical turning point in the Tuskegee Syphilis Study came in 1929 when the Stock Market Crash of 1929 led the Rosenwald Fund to withdraw its funding. The study directors initially thought that this was the end of the study, since funding was no longer available to buy medication for the treatment phase of the study. A final report was issued.
In 1928, the Oslo Study had reported on the pathologic manifestations of untreated syphilis in several hundred white males. This study was a retrospective study; investigators pieced together information from patients that had already contracted syphilis and had remained untreated for some time. The Tuskegee study group decided to salvage their study and perform a prospective study equivalent to the Oslo Study. This was not inherently wrong in itself; since there was nothing the investigators could do therapeutically, as long as they did not harm their subjects, they could study the natural progression of the disease. They reasoned that this would be of benefit to humankind. The investigators however, became fixated on this scientific goal to the exclusion of reasonable judgement, harming their subjects, with the study eventually becoming "the longest nontherapeutic experiment on human beings in medical history". Ethical considerations, poor from the start, rapidly deteriorated. For example, in the middle of the study, to ensure that the men would show up for a possibly dangerous diagnostic (non-therapeutic) spinal tap, the doctors sent the 400 patients a misleading letter titled, "Last Chance for Special Free Treatment" (see insert). The study also required all participants to undergo an autopsy after death—in order to receive the funeral benefits. For many participants, treatment was intentionally denied. Many patients were lied to and given placebo treatments—in order to observe the fatal progression of the disease. In 1934, the first clinical data was published, with the first major report being released in 1936. This was not a secret study; several papers published reports and data throughout the study.
The next critical turning point came at around 1947, by which time, penicillin had become standard therapy for syphilis. Several U.S. Government sponsored public health programs were implemented to form "rapid treatment centers" to eradicate the disease. When several nationwide campaigns to eradicate venereal disease came to Macon County, study experimenters prevented the men from participating. During World War II, 250 of the men registered for the draft and were consequently diagnosed and ordered to obtain treatment for syphilis; however then the PHS prevented them getting treatment. The PHS representative, Dr. Smith,at the time is quoted: "So far, we are keeping the known positive patients from getting treatment."
By the end of the study, only 74 of the test subjects were still alive. Twenty-eight of the men had died directly of syphilis, 100 were dead of related complications, 40 of their wives had been infected, and 19 of their children had been born with congenital syphilis.
Study termination and aftermath
In 1966, Peter Buxtun, a PHS venereal disease investigator in San Francisco, California, sent a letter to the director of the Division of Venereal Diseases to express his concerns about the morality of the experiment. The Center for Disease Control (CDC) reaffirmed the need to continue the study until completion (until all subjects had died and had been autopsied). To bolster its position, the CDC sought and gained support for the continuation of the study from the local chapters of the National Medical Association (representing African-American physicians) and the American Medical Association.
With his concerns rebuked, Peter Buxtun went to the press. The story broke first in the Washington Star on July 25, 1972, then became front page news in the New York Times the following day. As a result of public outcry, in 1972, an ad hoc advisory panel was appointed which determined the study was medically unjustified and ordered the termination of the study. As part of a settlement of a class action lawsuit subsequently filed by NAACP, 9 million dollars and the promise of free medical treatment was given to surviving participants and surviving family members who had been infected as a consequence of the study.
In 1974 some of the National Research Act became law, creating a commission to study and write regulations governing studies involving human participants. On May 16, 1997, with five of the eight remaining survivors of the study attending the White House ceremony, President Bill Clinton formally apologized to Tuskegee study participants: "What was done cannot be undone, but we can end the silence ... We can stop turning our heads away. We can look at you in the eye, and finally say, on behalf of the American people, what the United States government did was shameful and I am sorry."
Infamous examples of real racism in the past such as Tuskegee Syphilis Study (1932-1972) have injured the level of trust in the Black community towards public health efforts. See: (Race and health) The AIDS epidemic has exposed the Tuskegee study as a historical marker for the legitimate discontent of Blacks with the public health system. The belief that AIDS is a form of genocide is rooted in recent experiences of racism. These theories range from the belief that the government promotes drug abuse in Black communities to the belief that HIV is a manmade weapon of racial warfare. Researchers in public health hope that open and honest conversations about racism in the past can help rebuild trust and improve the health of people in these communities. [1]
Ethical implications
The early ethics of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study may be considered in isolation at study inception. In 1932, treatments for syphilis were relatively ineffective and had severe side effects. It was known that syphilis was particularly prevalent in poor, black communities. The intention of the Study was in part to measure the prevalence of the disease, to study its natural history and the real effectiveness of treatment. Prevailing medical ethics at the time did not have the exacting standards for informed consent currently expected; doctors routinely withheld information about patients' condition from them. A clinical study to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment of this then terrible disease was not inherently wrong. However, this study exploited a vulnerable sub-population to answer a question which would have been of benefit to the whole population. This was, some argue, a manifestation of racism on the part of the study organizers.
However, with the development of an effective, simple treatment for syphilis (i.e. penicillin), and changing ethical standards, the ethical and moral judgements became absolutely indefensible. By the time the study had closed, hundreds of men had died from syphilis and many of their wives had become infected and their children born with congenital syphilis. This study has become synonymous with exploitation in clinical studies, and has been compared with the nonconsensual experimentation of the Nazi physicians.[2]
Sociological studies have shown that the Tuskegee Syphilis Study has predisposed many African Americans to distrust medical and public health authorities. The Study is likely a significant factor in the low participation of African Americans in clinical trials and organ donation efforts and in the reluctance of many Black people to seek routine preventive care[3].
The aftershocks of this study led directly to the establishment of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research and the National Research Act. This act requires the establishment of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) at institutions receiving federal grants. Special consideration must be given to ethnic minorities and vulnerable groups in the design of clinical studies.
Dramatizations
Dr. David Feldshuh wrote a stage play in 1992 based on the history of the Tuskegee study, titled Miss Evers' Boys. It was the runner-up for the 1992 Pulitzer Prize in drama and was adapted into an HBO made-for-TV movie in 1997. The adaptation was nominated for twelve Emmy Awards [1], winning in five categories.[4]
Frank Zappa's musical Thing-Fish is loosely inspired by the events.
The graphic novel Truth: Red, White and Black tells the story of black servicemen injected with the prototype "Super Soldier Serum" that would later be perfected to turn Steve Rogers into Captain America. The testing of the drug on black servicemen was inspired by the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment.
References
- ↑ The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, 1932 to 1972: implications for HIV education and AIDS risk education programs in the black community. Am J Public Health. 1991 November; 81(11): 1498–1505.
- ↑ Robert Jay Lifton (2000), The Nazi Doctors, Basic Books (also now online)
- ↑ http://www.cnn.com/2007/HEALTH/02/07/bone.marrow/index.html
- ↑ Miss Evers' Boys (1997): Awards and Nominations. Academy of Television Arts & Sciences. Retrieved on 24 October 2013.