Hatch Act: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Richard Jensen
(new article (not from Wiki))
 
mNo edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Hatch Act''' is a federal law that strictly limits the political activity of federal employees. It was designed to prevent the [[WPA]] from becomeing a national political machine, and remains the law.
{{subpages}}
The '''Hatch Act''' is a 1939 federal law that strictly limits the political activity of federal employees. It was designed to prevent the [[Works Projects Administration]] (WPA) from becoming a national political machine.  It remains law today.


Gall (1995) chronicles the Hatch Act from its passing in 1939, through its amendment in 1940, and to its further amendment in 1993. New Mexico Senator Carl A. Hatch drafted "clean up government" legislation that included a provision prohibiting federal employees from taking an active part in partisan political activity. The United Federal Workers of America (UFWA), an affiliate of the [[CIO]] challenged the law's constitutionality, but the Supreme Court ultimately ruled in United Public Workers v. Mitchell (1947) that government's need for "orderly management of administration" was greater than the appellant's freedom of expression. Organized labor won the long struggle, when in 1993 Congress passed a new amendment removing the restrictions.
The [[Pendleton Act]] (1883), supplemented by executive orders of Presidents [[Grover Cleveland]] and [[Theodore Roosevelt]], limited the political activities of career civil servants (e.g., in the General Service (GS) series, or GG series in the United States intelligence community ). The Hatch Act (1939) extended limitations to employees appointed by the [[Franklin D. Roosevelt|current administration]] (e.g., Schedule C) as well.


==Bibliography==
Gall (1995) chronicles the Hatch Act from its passing in 1939, through its amendment in 1940, and to its further amendment in 1993. New Mexico Senator [[Carl A. Hatch]] drafted "clean up government" legislation that included a provision prohibiting federal employees from taking an active part in partisan political activity.  The [[United Federal Workers of America]] (UFWA), an affiliate of the [[Congress of Industrial Organizations]] (CIO) challenged the law's constitutionality, <[[Talk:Hatch Act#1993|see talk page]]>[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]]
* Gall, Gilbert. "The CIO & the Hatch Act: the Roosevelt Court and the Divided New Deal Legacy of the 1940s." ''Labor's Heritage 1995'' 7(1): 4-21. Issn: 1041-5904 
 
 
----------
<references/>
----------
[[Category:History Workgroup]]
[[Category:Politics Workgroup]]
[[Category:CZ Live]]

Latest revision as of 06:00, 26 August 2024

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

The Hatch Act is a 1939 federal law that strictly limits the political activity of federal employees. It was designed to prevent the Works Projects Administration (WPA) from becoming a national political machine. It remains law today.

The Pendleton Act (1883), supplemented by executive orders of Presidents Grover Cleveland and Theodore Roosevelt, limited the political activities of career civil servants (e.g., in the General Service (GS) series, or GG series in the United States intelligence community ). The Hatch Act (1939) extended limitations to employees appointed by the current administration (e.g., Schedule C) as well.

Gall (1995) chronicles the Hatch Act from its passing in 1939, through its amendment in 1940, and to its further amendment in 1993. New Mexico Senator Carl A. Hatch drafted "clean up government" legislation that included a provision prohibiting federal employees from taking an active part in partisan political activity. The United Federal Workers of America (UFWA), an affiliate of the Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO) challenged the law's constitutionality, <see talk page>