Grothendieck topology: Difference between revisions
imported>Giovanni Antonio DiMatteo |
mNo edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The notion of a ''Grothendieck topology'' or ''site'' captures the essential properties necessary for constructing a robust theory of cohomology of sheaves. The theory of Grothendieck topologies was developed by Alexander Grothendieck and Michael Artin. | {{subpages}} | ||
The notion of a '''Grothendieck topology''' or '''site'''' captures the essential properties necessary for constructing a robust theory of cohomology of sheaves. The theory of Grothendieck topologies was developed by Alexander Grothendieck and Michael Artin. | |||
==Definition== | ==Definition== | ||
Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
#A standard topological space <math>X</math> becomes a category <math>op(X)</math> when you regard the open subsets of <math>X</math> as objects, and morphisms are inclusions. An open covering of open subsets <math>U</math> clearly verify the axioms above for coverings in a site. Notice that a [[presheaf]] of rings is just a contravariant functor from the category <math>op(X)</math> into the category of rings. | #A standard topological space <math>X</math> becomes a category <math>op(X)</math> when you regard the open subsets of <math>X</math> as objects, and morphisms are inclusions. An open covering of open subsets <math>U</math> clearly verify the axioms above for coverings in a site. Notice that a [[presheaf]] of rings is just a contravariant functor from the category <math>op(X)</math> into the category of rings. | ||
#'''The Small Étale Site''' Let <math>S</math> be a scheme. Then the [[Étale morphism|category of étale schemes]] over <math>S</math> (i.e., <math>S</math>-schemes <math>X</math> over <math>S</math> whose structural morphisms are étale) | #'''The Small Étale Site''' Let <math>S</math> be a scheme. Then the [[Étale morphism|category of étale schemes]] over <math>S</math> (i.e., <math>S</math>-schemes <math>X</math> over <math>S</math> whose structural morphisms are étale) becomes a site if we require that coverings are jointly surjective; that is, | ||
==Sheaves on Sites== | ==Sheaves on Sites== | ||
Line 20: | Line 21: | ||
such that for all coverings <math>\{U_i\to U\}\in cov(T)</math>, the diagram | such that for all coverings <math>\{U_i\to U\}\in cov(T)</math>, the diagram | ||
<math>0\to F(U)\to \prod F(U_i)\to \prod F(U_i\times_U U_j)</math> | <math>0\to F(U)\to \prod F(U_i)\to \prod F(U_i\times_U U_j)</math> | ||
is exact. | is exact.[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] | ||
[[Category: | |||
Latest revision as of 06:00, 24 August 2024
The notion of a Grothendieck topology or site' captures the essential properties necessary for constructing a robust theory of cohomology of sheaves. The theory of Grothendieck topologies was developed by Alexander Grothendieck and Michael Artin.
Definition
A Grothendieck topology consists of
- A category, denoted
- A set of coverings , denoted , such that
- for each object of
- If , and is any morphism in , then the canonical morphisms of the fiber products determine a covering
- If and , then
Examples
- A standard topological space becomes a category when you regard the open subsets of as objects, and morphisms are inclusions. An open covering of open subsets Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle U} clearly verify the axioms above for coverings in a site. Notice that a presheaf of rings is just a contravariant functor from the category Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle op(X)} into the category of rings.
- The Small Étale Site Let Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle S} be a scheme. Then the category of étale schemes over Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle S} (i.e., Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle S} -schemes Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle X} over Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle S} whose structural morphisms are étale) becomes a site if we require that coverings are jointly surjective; that is,
Sheaves on Sites
In analogy with the situation for topological spaces, a presheaf may be defined as a contravariant functor such that for all coverings Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \{U_i\to U\}\in cov(T)} , the diagram Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle 0\to F(U)\to \prod F(U_i)\to \prod F(U_i\times_U U_j)} is exact.