Internet Protocol version 6 address management: Difference between revisions
John Leach (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
John Leach (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "]]" to "") |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{PropDel}}<br><br>{{subpages}} | {{PropDel}}<br><br>{{subpages}} | ||
This article deals with the process of '''obtaining and managing [[Internet Protocol version 6 | This article deals with the process of '''obtaining and managing [[Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) address space.''' The size and other characteristics of the address block assigned will affect many aspects of deployment. | ||
After obtaining [[Internet Protocol version 4 | After obtaining [[Internet Protocol version 4 address space, there remain operational issues in effectively managing it. IPv4 supports dynamic, but stateful, address assignment using the [[Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP). In this context, "stateful" means that there is a server that knows the relationship between a specific computer and the address it is given. DHCP implementations, however, usually only know that relationship as between low-level machine identifier (i.e., [[IEEE 802 address) and IP address. Experience showed that considerable effort was needed to find a machine by its MAC address, and [[Dynamic DNS update, assuming DNS names could be given to hosts, was operationally superior. There is an upgraded DHCP mechanism that supports IPv6 address assignment, but, in addition, IPv6 has another mechanism, [[Internet Protocol version 6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC), in which there is no addressing server; a host computes its own address.<ref name=RFC4862>{{citation | ||
| title = IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration | | title = IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration | ||
| author = S. Thomson, T. Narten, T. Jinmei | | author = S. Thomson, T. Narten, T. Jinmei | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| url = http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4862.txt | | url = http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4862.txt | ||
| date = September 2007 | | date = September 2007 | ||
}}</ref> For SLAAC to be operationally manageable, there needs to be a means of matching hosts to general identifiers, and, again, [[Dynamic DNS update | }}</ref> For SLAAC to be operationally manageable, there needs to be a means of matching hosts to general identifiers, and, again, [[Dynamic DNS update appears to be the only viable mechanism. | ||
Best practices are evolving. Sources used here include the [[ARIN | Best practices are evolving. Sources used here include the [[ARIN IPv6 wiki <ref name=ARIN-IPv6-Wiki>{{citation | ||
| url = http://www.getipv6.info/index.php/IPv6_Addressing_Plans | | url = http://www.getipv6.info/index.php/IPv6_Addressing_Plans | ||
| title = IPv6 Addressing Plans | | title = IPv6 Addressing Plans | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
==General principles, perhaps counterintuitive to IPv4 experience== | ==General principles, perhaps counterintuitive to IPv4 experience== | ||
===Subnet assumptions=== | ===Subnet assumptions=== | ||
Each network segment (LAN, VLAN, etc.) should be a /64. Remember that 48 bits of that will be the MAC, feeding into the EUI64 process used by stateless autoconfiguration. The remaining /16 bits gives quite a bit of room for internal aggregation (e.g., [[OSPF#area|OSPF areas | Each network segment (LAN, VLAN, etc.) should be a /64. Remember that 48 bits of that will be the MAC, feeding into the EUI64 process used by stateless autoconfiguration. The remaining /16 bits gives quite a bit of room for internal aggregation (e.g., [[OSPF#area|OSPF areas). | ||
Aspects of good IPv6 management will be quite counter-intuitive for experienced IPv4 network designers and administrators. For example, the IETF expects that you will assign a /64 even for point-to-point links. | Aspects of good IPv6 management will be quite counter-intuitive for experienced IPv4 network designers and administrators. For example, the IETF expects that you will assign a /64 even for point-to-point links. |
Revision as of 06:29, 18 March 2024
This article may be deleted soon. | ||
---|---|---|
This article deals with the process of obtaining and managing [[Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) address space. The size and other characteristics of the address block assigned will affect many aspects of deployment. After obtaining [[Internet Protocol version 4 address space, there remain operational issues in effectively managing it. IPv4 supports dynamic, but stateful, address assignment using the [[Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP). In this context, "stateful" means that there is a server that knows the relationship between a specific computer and the address it is given. DHCP implementations, however, usually only know that relationship as between low-level machine identifier (i.e., [[IEEE 802 address) and IP address. Experience showed that considerable effort was needed to find a machine by its MAC address, and [[Dynamic DNS update, assuming DNS names could be given to hosts, was operationally superior. There is an upgraded DHCP mechanism that supports IPv6 address assignment, but, in addition, IPv6 has another mechanism, [[Internet Protocol version 6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC), in which there is no addressing server; a host computes its own address.[1] For SLAAC to be operationally manageable, there needs to be a means of matching hosts to general identifiers, and, again, [[Dynamic DNS update appears to be the only viable mechanism. Best practices are evolving. Sources used here include the [[ARIN IPv6 wiki [2] and the IPv6 Portal [3] General principles, perhaps counterintuitive to IPv4 experienceSubnet assumptionsEach network segment (LAN, VLAN, etc.) should be a /64. Remember that 48 bits of that will be the MAC, feeding into the EUI64 process used by stateless autoconfiguration. The remaining /16 bits gives quite a bit of room for internal aggregation (e.g., [[OSPF#area|OSPF areas). Aspects of good IPv6 management will be quite counter-intuitive for experienced IPv4 network designers and administrators. For example, the IETF expects that you will assign a /64 even for point-to-point links.
Private addressesBefore assuming the need for private addresses in the style of RFC1918, think long and hard about why they are needed in an IPv6 context. Even in IPv4, RFC1918 has not been a panacea, especially after mergers and divestitures, or a need for an extranet VPN, or simply to expand the address space. The IPv6-ish way to creat a ULA prefix as defined in RFC4193[5]
Note that the use of ULAs is not widespread, and in many environments it is not desirable (assuming Globals will also be present, another address space to operate (manage, filter, route, etc.)). End user organizationsThe enterprise network should receive a prefix sufficient to provide a /48 allocation for each site (office/campus/PoP) at which the company has employees or systems. Organizations may have multiple /48s for groups of sites; there will need to be justification that the larger blocks will be adequately used, according to address registry guidelines, within five years. Orgainzations with multiple /48 allocations should consider enterprise-wise aggregation levels of /60 or larger blocks for the administration of enterprise policies for common functions such as:
End user sitesFor end user sites, the basic allocation is assumed to be a /48, which allows 65k subnets (larger allocations are possible, simply requiring justification). When considering this number of subnets, remember that the large address space is meant to avoid the complexities of the many lengths of subnets common in real-world IPv4 implementations. Per the IETF - No subnets, with an exception for loopbacks, will use prefixes longer than /64 and the /128 loopback assignments would normally come out of a specific /64 block. The above specification does have some exceptions, places where the "real world" might disagree with the IETF.
Service providersAll customers get one /48 unless they can show that they need more than 65k subnets.
Expect the registry to allocate a /32 and reserve one /32
References
|