Talk:Homeopathy/Archive 13: Difference between revisions
imported>Gareth Leng No edit summary |
imported>Chris day (→Lead?) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Keeping this here so we can see how it looks if and when style issues advance[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 12:25, 9 November 2006 (CST) | Keeping this here so we can see how it looks if and when style issues advance[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 12:25, 9 November 2006 (CST) | ||
:That would make more sense. I have been trying to track down the CZ style guide/ideas with no luck. I have seen discussion here and there but nothing concrete. Am I missing something obvious? [[User:Chris day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris day|(Talk)]] 12:31, 9 November 2006 (CST) |
Revision as of 12:31, 9 November 2006
I'd like to point out that, after the first two paragraphs, I still haven't got the faintest clue what "homeopathy" means. Those paragraphs are also extremely badly written. --Larry Sanger 11:46, 4 November 2006 (CST)
Yes, I agree. I've trimmed this article down from a very long and wandering WP original, and done some re-ordering and reference tidying, but it's still an uncomfortable hybrid. Really needs a complete write-through.Gareth Leng 11:02, 7 November 2006 (CST)
Lead?
It's been suggested (not by me) that the new CZ style might incorprate a short and simple boxed message, and that for this article, that box might contain the text:
"Homeopathy is an Alternative Medicine system that tries to treat illnesses with tiny doses of the drugs that cause the same symptom as the illness. Homeopathy is based on the ideas of Samuel Hahnemann, a 19th century physician who observed that some contemporary medicines evoked symptoms similar to those of the illnesses for which they were prescribed. There is no clear evidence to support the efficacy of homeopathic remedies, and it is likely that the reported effects are placebo effects."
Keeping this here so we can see how it looks if and when style issues advanceGareth Leng 12:25, 9 November 2006 (CST)