Talk:Iraq War: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Denis Cavanagh
(added the Iraq War article to my list)
 
(70 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}


==Material from 9-11 Attack article==
==Created archive 1 so focus can be on new work==
''[http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=9-11_Attack&diff=100139615&oldid=100139228 Richard Jensen deleted all this] from the [[9-11 Attacks]] article on 26th July 2007, so I'm archiving it here in case any comes in useful (needs work):''
While this is obviously a work in progress, I have created several subarticles and intend to do more, moving out some of the details. For that matter, I still have a WMD article in my sandbox.


Bush went on to identify an "Axis of Evil" — Iraq, Iran and North Korea, citing the existence of their regimes as a threat to long-term global peace, which could not be assured with their capacity and incentive to make weapons of mass destruction. While Iran and North Korea have so far escaped serious intervention, Iraq was quickly identified as a clear and present threat to the rest of the world. However, the United Kingdom was the only country whose government supplied unwavering political and military support to the USA in its plans to remove the regime of Saddam Hussein; many other countries publically supported action, but stopped short of backing an invasion.
One of the questions, which applies to Afghanistan as well, is if and when the main "War" article should end and an article on continuing security assistance continue. After all, we aren't still writing about WWII occupation of Germany and Japan, although there are still large numbers of US troops there. Perhaps one metric might be the establishment of an elected government '''and''' the execution of a [[Status of Forces Agreement]]. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 14:42, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
The U.S. and U.K governments concocted a number of controversial claims that were later found to be false and deliberately fabricated; however, they did attempt to secure a United Nations resolution permitting military action against Iraq. The authority to invade a country and topple a regime being in violation of international law, the 'Coalition of the Willing' were unable to secure broad support for the attack. America and its new coalition partners demanded that Saddam Hussein resign; when he refused they invaded Iraq and ousted him in March 2003.
The Coalition's invasion and occupation of Iraq, outside international law, led to other potential targets to develop alternative strategies of more constructive engagement with the rest of the world. Pakistan, which had been involved in illegal nuclear weapons proliferation and was the only country to officially recognise the Taliban, became a close ally in the war against al-Qaeda. Libya renounced its own program of building weapons of mass destruction and was welcomed back into the community of nations and the oil market; the regime of Colonel Gaddafi was left untouched, despite its consistent support for terrorism over the years and long record of human rights abuses.
America's willingness to act without the consent of the international community has been seena s deeply troubling for some sections of the global community, especially those whose background has much in common with the Middle East, such as many Muslims. Donald Rumsfeld's characterisation of "Old Europe" - Western European countries such as France and Germany, which opposed the invasion - and "New Europe" - America's former Communist allies in Eastern Europe - also raised hackles.


== Needs work ==
== all these need to be merged this main article, and the whole thing needs cleaning up ==
This article badly needs work. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 08:15, 18 September 2007 (CDT)
All these need to be merged this main article, and then this article needs to be cleaned up. [[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] ([[User talk:Pat Palmer|talk]]) 09:16, 24 February 2024 (CST)
:Couldn't agree more. I have started some work on this, but this is one big, hot potato. Keeping this NPOV will be nearly impossible, but let's try.
* [[Iraq War, origins of invasion]]
:I have rewritten the intro and added a more substantial piece on the weapons inspections in the 1990s. I also deleted some more text about the letter to Clinton by the neoconservatives as it seemed redundant (it doesn't seem as important as to warrant that much text in the article). I'll include the deleted text here:
* [[Iraq War, theater operational planning]]
<blockquote>
* {[[Iraq War, major combat phase]]
The Project for a New American Century believed an invasion of [[Iraq]] to be necessary in September [[2000]], long before their supposed complicity in the [[9-11 Attack]]; ''While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein.''<ref>http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf A report from the Project for a New American Century in relation to rebuilding America and invading Iraq</ref>
* [[Iraq War, insurgency]]
</blockquote>
* [[Iraq War, Surge]]
:This article still needs a lot of work, including a lot of fact checking and sourcing. Can't do it alone. [[User:Michel van der Hoek|Michel van der Hoek]] 23:07, 7 May 2008 (CDT)


:I can do a bit of double checking for you if you'd like, but I've given up trying to make a neutral article on this (The original monstrosity was mine by the way :-) [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 18:07, 8 May 2008 (CDT)
:I agree there should be only a single article incorporating all themes, but I recommend that the current version is scrapped and rewritten from scratch. [[User:John Leach|John]] ([[User talk:John Leach|talk]]) 07:59, 14 March 2024 (CDT)
 
::Agreed.  I added this to my list of oil spills. [[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] ([[User talk:Pat Palmer|talk]]) 08:28, 14 March 2024 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 08:28, 14 March 2024

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  (2003-2011) Invasion and occupation of Iraq by a coalition of countries led by the U.S. to depose Saddam Hussein who was accused of stockpiling weapons of mass destruction (which were never found). [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Politics, Military and History [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive:  1  English language variant:  American English

Created archive 1 so focus can be on new work

While this is obviously a work in progress, I have created several subarticles and intend to do more, moving out some of the details. For that matter, I still have a WMD article in my sandbox.

One of the questions, which applies to Afghanistan as well, is if and when the main "War" article should end and an article on continuing security assistance continue. After all, we aren't still writing about WWII occupation of Germany and Japan, although there are still large numbers of US troops there. Perhaps one metric might be the establishment of an elected government and the execution of a Status of Forces Agreement. Howard C. Berkowitz 14:42, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

all these need to be merged this main article, and the whole thing needs cleaning up

All these need to be merged this main article, and then this article needs to be cleaned up. Pat Palmer (talk) 09:16, 24 February 2024 (CST)

I agree there should be only a single article incorporating all themes, but I recommend that the current version is scrapped and rewritten from scratch. John (talk) 07:59, 14 March 2024 (CDT)
Agreed. I added this to my list of oil spills. Pat Palmer (talk) 08:28, 14 March 2024 (CDT)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Iraq_War&oldid=931975"