Talk:Ear: Difference between revisions
imported>DavidGoodman (qys about scope) |
imported>Supten Sarbadhikari No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{checklist | |||
| abc = The ear | |||
| cat1 = Biology | |||
| cat2 = Needs category | |||
| cat_check = y | |||
| status = | |||
| underlinked = y | |||
| cleanup = n | |||
| by = [[User:Supten Sarbadhikari|Supten]] | |||
}} | |||
==Classification== | |||
Is all of the lead applicable to all vertebrates? There seems no place | Is all of the lead applicable to all vertebrates? There seems no place | ||
in the article for the discussion of | in the article for the discussion of |
Revision as of 22:28, 8 March 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Biology Workgroup, Needs category Workgroup, [[:CZ:{{{cat3}}} Workgroup|{{{cat3}}} Workgroup]] [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Not specified |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | No |
Checklist last edited by | Supten |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
[[Category:{{{cat3}}} Category Check|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Advanced Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Nonstub Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Internal Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Developed Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Advanced Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Nonstub Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Internal Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Developing Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Nonstub Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Internal Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Stub Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Internal Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} External Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Underlinked Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Cleanup|The ear]]
Classification
Is all of the lead applicable to all vertebrates? There seems no place in the article for the discussion of non-human vertebrates--not even other mammals. Is the article talking only about vertebrates. And shouldn't the first ref be an anatomical authority, not a 4 p. clinical review? DavidGoodman 21:57, 2 November 2006 (CST)
- Biology Category Check
- General Category Check
- Needs category Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Biology Advanced Articles
- Biology Nonstub Articles
- Biology Internal Articles
- Needs category Advanced Articles
- Needs category Nonstub Articles
- Needs category Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Biology Developed Articles
- Needs category Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Biology Developing Articles
- Needs category Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Biology Stub Articles
- Needs category Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Biology External Articles
- Needs category External Articles
- Biology Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Needs category Underlinked Articles
- Biology Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Needs category Cleanup