Supreme Court of the United States/Catalogs: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(New page: {{subpages}} ==Subject== ===Confinement=== {{r|Kansas v. Crane}} {{r|Korematsu v. United States}} {{r|Hamdi v. Rumsfeld}} ===Jurisdiction=== {{r|Ex parte Quirin}} {{r|Johnson v. Eisentrage...)
 
m (Text replacement - "United States}}" to "United States of America}}")
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
* [[/Justices|Justices]]
==Subject==
==Subject==
===Confinement===
===Confinement===
{{r|Kansas v. Crane}}
{{r|Kansas v. Crane}}
{{r|Korematsu v. United States}}
{{r|Korematsu v. United States of America}}
{{r|Hamdi v. Rumsfeld}}
{{r|Hamdi v. Rumsfeld}}
===Jurisdiction===
===Jurisdiction===

Latest revision as of 13:17, 2 February 2023

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Catalogs [?]
 
An informational catalog, or several catalogs, about Supreme Court of the United States.

Subject

Confinement

Jurisdiction

  • Ex parte Quirin [r]: A 1942 Supreme Court of the United States ruling that affirmed the right to try captured enemy personnel, who operated in civilian clothing, by a Presidentially appointed secret military tribunal [e]
  • Johnson v. Eisentrager [r]: A 1950 U.S. Supreme Court decision that nonresident enemy aliens, captured in the context of a declared war outside the jurisdiction of any U.S. civil court, were purely under the jurisdiction of military law and had no access to the U.S. judicial system [e]
  • Hamdan v. Rumsfeld [r]: A 2006 decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, stating that there was no basis for trying, by U.S. military commission, a person captured in combat with U.S. allies on foreign soil, and turned over to U.S. forces [e]
  • Marbury v. Madison [r]: An 1803 U.S. Supreme Court case that established its power of judicial review [e]