Archive:Approval and Feedback: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Anthony.Sebastian No edit summary |
Pat Palmer (talk | contribs) ({{NoLongerApplies}}) |
||
(12 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{NoLongerApplies}} | ||
This is the future home of an Approval and Feedback Initiative: it's all about recognizing excellence. | This is the future home of an Approval and Feedback Initiative: it's all about recognizing excellence. | ||
==Personnel== | |||
Here is an alphabetical list of the voting members of the Approval and Feedback Workgroup. Anyone may view and comment on proposals before this group, on [[CZ:Proposals/Approval_and_Feedback|this Proposals System page]]. | |||
* [[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] | |||
* [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] | |||
* [[User:Carl Hewitt|Carl Hewitt]] | |||
* [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] | |||
* [[User:Roger Lohmann|Roger Lohmann]] | |||
* [[User:Jaime Nubiola|Jaime Nubiola]] | |||
* [[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] | * [[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] | ||
* [[User: | * [[User:Supten Sarbadhikari|Supten Sarbadhikari]] | ||
* [[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] | |||
* [[User:David Shapinsky|David Shapinsky]] | * [[User:David Shapinsky|David Shapinsky]] | ||
* [[User: | * [[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]] | ||
* | ==Mailing list== | ||
*[[ | The mailing list for the Approval and Feedback group, acting as a subcommittee of the Editorial Council and with authority to approve A&F proposals, is [http://mail.citizendium.org/mailman/listinfo/cz-approfeed cz-approfeed.] The list archives are open to read, but only specifically listed members of the A&F group can subscribe. | ||
==Problems with current (March 2008) article approval system== | |||
*Rate of approval too slow | |||
*Too much confusion about what the process is | |||
*No simple, prominently-placed version of instructions | |||
*No easy way to get the word out to specific sets of editors that we want reviews | |||
*No set way for editors to simply ''review'' an article and thereby enumerate what an article needs in order to be approvable | |||
{{Initiatives}} | |||
[[Category:Archived Pages]] |
Latest revision as of 08:49, 11 December 2022
The information on the page below is likely OBSOLETE |
At least some of this information applied to an older way of operating The wiki's policies and rules are now linked to the main page at Welcome_to_Citizendium. |
This is the future home of an Approval and Feedback Initiative: it's all about recognizing excellence.
Personnel
Here is an alphabetical list of the voting members of the Approval and Feedback Workgroup. Anyone may view and comment on proposals before this group, on this Proposals System page.
- Martin Baldwin-Edwards
- J. Noel Chiappa
- Carl Hewitt
- D. Matt Innis
- Roger Lohmann
- Jaime Nubiola
- Larry Sanger
- Supten Sarbadhikari
- Anthony.Sebastian
- David Shapinsky
- David E. Volk
Mailing list
The mailing list for the Approval and Feedback group, acting as a subcommittee of the Editorial Council and with authority to approve A&F proposals, is cz-approfeed. The list archives are open to read, but only specifically listed members of the A&F group can subscribe.
Problems with current (March 2008) article approval system
- Rate of approval too slow
- Too much confusion about what the process is
- No simple, prominently-placed version of instructions
- No easy way to get the word out to specific sets of editors that we want reviews
- No set way for editors to simply review an article and thereby enumerate what an article needs in order to be approvable
Citizendium Initiatives | ||
---|---|---|
Eduzendium | Featured Article | Recruitment | Subpages | Core Articles | Uncategorized pages | Requested Articles | Feedback Requests | Wanted Articles |
|width=10% align=center style="background:#F5F5F5"| |}