Archive:Approval and Feedback: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
({{NoLongerApplies}})
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{NoLongerApplies}}
This is the future home of an Approval and Feedback Initiative: it's all about recognizing excellence.
This is the future home of an Approval and Feedback Initiative: it's all about recognizing excellence.


Line 26: Line 28:


{{Initiatives}}
{{Initiatives}}
[[Category:Archived Pages]]

Latest revision as of 08:49, 11 December 2022


The information on the page below is likely OBSOLETE
At least some of this information applied to an older way of operating
The wiki's policies and rules are now linked to the main page at Welcome_to_Citizendium.

This is the future home of an Approval and Feedback Initiative: it's all about recognizing excellence.

Personnel

Here is an alphabetical list of the voting members of the Approval and Feedback Workgroup. Anyone may view and comment on proposals before this group, on this Proposals System page.

Mailing list

The mailing list for the Approval and Feedback group, acting as a subcommittee of the Editorial Council and with authority to approve A&F proposals, is cz-approfeed. The list archives are open to read, but only specifically listed members of the A&F group can subscribe.

Problems with current (March 2008) article approval system

  • Rate of approval too slow
  • Too much confusion about what the process is
  • No simple, prominently-placed version of instructions
  • No easy way to get the word out to specific sets of editors that we want reviews
  • No set way for editors to simply review an article and thereby enumerate what an article needs in order to be approvable


Citizendium Initiatives
Eduzendium | Featured Article | Recruitment | Subpages | Core Articles | Uncategorized pages |
Requested Articles | Feedback Requests | Wanted Articles

|width=10% align=center style="background:#F5F5F5"|  |}