Subjective-objective dichotomy/External Links: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>John R. Brews mNo edit summary |
imported>John R. Brews (Jones) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*{{cite web |url=http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114754/steven-pinker-leon-wieseltier-debate-science-vs-humanities |title=Science vs. the humanities: Round III |author=Steven Pinker, Leon Wieseltier |date=September 26, 2013 | *{{cite web |url=http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114754/steven-pinker-leon-wieseltier-debate-science-vs-humanities |title=Science vs. the humanities: Round III |author=Steven Pinker, Leon Wieseltier |date=September 26, 2013 | ||
|publisher=New Republic}} Pinker-Wieseltier debate Part III. Pinker: "Good ideas can come from any source, and they must be evaluated on their cogency"; Wieseltier: "I am for a two-state solution. In this arena of tension, as in the other one, I believe that a one-state solution would involve the erasure of one of the realms, its distortion by, and subordination to, an authority that has no legitimate claim over it." | |publisher=New Republic}} Pinker-Wieseltier debate Part III. Pinker: "Good ideas can come from any source, and they must be evaluated on their cogency"; Wieseltier: "I am for a two-state solution. In this arena of tension, as in the other one, I believe that a one-state solution would involve the erasure of one of the realms, its distortion by, and subordination to, an authority that has no legitimate claim over it." | ||
*{{cite book |author=James W. Jones |title=Can Science Explain Religion?: The Cognitive Science Debate |chapter=Chapter 4: Beyond Reductive Physicalism: ''Mind and Nature'' |pages=pp. 140 ff |isbn=9780190249380 |year=2015 |publisher=Oxford University Press |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lgE7CgAAQBAJ&pg=PA140&dq}} |
Revision as of 22:47, 16 February 2016
- Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner and consider archiving the URLs behind the links you provide. See also related web sources.
- Steven Pinker (August 6, 2013). Science is not your enemy: An impassioned plea to professors and tenure-less historians. New Republic. Pinker's essay on science and the humanities: "Surely our conceptions of politics, culture, and morality have much to learn from our best understanding of the physical universe and of our makeup as a species."
- Leon Wieseltier (September 3, 2013). Crimes against humanity: Now science wants to invade the liberal arts. Don't let it happen.. New Republic. Wieseltier's reply to Pinker. "The question of the place of science in knowledge, and in society, and in life, is not a scientific question...science [does not] confer any license to extend its categories and its methods beyond its own realms, whose contours are of course a matter of debate."
- Steven Pinker, Leon Wieseltier (September 26, 2013). Science vs. the humanities: Round III. New Republic. Pinker-Wieseltier debate Part III. Pinker: "Good ideas can come from any source, and they must be evaluated on their cogency"; Wieseltier: "I am for a two-state solution. In this arena of tension, as in the other one, I believe that a one-state solution would involve the erasure of one of the realms, its distortion by, and subordination to, an authority that has no legitimate claim over it."
- James W. Jones (2015). “Chapter 4: Beyond Reductive Physicalism: Mind and Nature”, Can Science Explain Religion?: The Cognitive Science Debate. Oxford University Press, pp. 140 ff. ISBN 9780190249380.
Categories:
- External Link Subpages
- Philosophy External Link Subpages
- Physics External Link Subpages
- Psychology External Link Subpages
- Subpages
- External Links
- Philosophy External Links
- Physics External Links
- Psychology External Links
- All Content
- Philosophy Content
- Physics Content
- Psychology Content
- Pages using ISBN magic links