ABC conjecture: Difference between revisions
imported>Richard Pinch (→Statement: added Baker's version and Stewart & Yu result) |
imported>Richard Pinch m (→Statement: better) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:<math> \kappa(\epsilon) = \inf_{A+B+C=0,\ (A,B)=1} \frac{\max\{|A|,|B|,|C|\}}{N^{1+\epsilon}} \ , | :<math> \kappa(\epsilon) = \inf_{A+B+C=0,\ (A,B)=1} \frac{\max\{|A|,|B|,|C|\}}{N^{1+\epsilon}} \ , | ||
then it is known that <math>\kappa \rightarrow \infty</math> as <math>\ | then it is known that <math>\kappa \rightarrow \infty</math> as <math>\epsilon \rightarrow 0</math>. | ||
Baker introduced a more refined version of the conjecture in 1996. Assume as before that <math>A + B + C = 0</math> holds for coprime integers <math>A,B,C</math>. Let <math>N</math> be the radical of <math>ABC</math> and <math>\omega</math> the number of distinct prime factors of <math>ABC</math>. Then | Baker introduced a more refined version of the conjecture in 1996. Assume as before that <math>A + B + C = 0</math> holds for coprime integers <math>A,B,C</math>. Let <math>N</math> be the radical of <math>ABC</math> and <math>\omega</math> the number of distinct prime factors of <math>ABC</math>. Then |
Revision as of 12:10, 13 January 2013
In mathematics, the ABC conjecture relates the prime factors of two integers to those of their sum. It was proposed by David Masser and Joseph Oesterlé in 1985. It is connected with other problems of number theory: for example, the truth of the ABC conjecture would provide a new proof of Fermat's Last Theorem.
Statement
Define the radical of an integer to be the product of its distinct prime factors
Suppose now that the equation holds for coprime integers . The conjecture asserts that for every there exists such that
The weak ABC conjecture states that
If we define
- as .
Baker introduced a more refined version of the conjecture in 1996. Assume as before that holds for coprime integers . Let be the radical of and the number of distinct prime factors of . Then
This form of the conjecture would give very strong bounds in the method of linear forms in logarithms.
Results
It is known that there is an effectively computable such that