Talk:United Kingdom: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Peter Jackson
imported>Nick Gardner
Line 13: Line 13:


I can probably find some secondary sources given time, but the well-known primary source is the obiter dictum of the then Lord President of the Court of Session, Lord Cooper of Culross, in MacCormick v Lord Advocate (1953: SC 396, SLT 255): “the principle of unlimited sovereignty of Parliament is a distinctively English principle and has no counterpart in Scottish constitutional law”. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 10:25, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
I can probably find some secondary sources given time, but the well-known primary source is the obiter dictum of the then Lord President of the Court of Session, Lord Cooper of Culross, in MacCormick v Lord Advocate (1953: SC 396, SLT 255): “the principle of unlimited sovereignty of Parliament is a distinctively English principle and has no counterpart in Scottish constitutional law”. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 10:25, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
:The Lord President was presumably referring to the sovereignty of the ''Scottish'' Parliament. It is hard to see how Scottish law could have any bearing on the sovereignty of the UK parliament.  [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 21:09, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:09, 18 February 2012

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Catalogs [?]
Addendum [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Constitutional monarchy which includes England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Geography and History [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive 1  English language variant British English

Review and overhaul

I have begun a review of this article with a view to making it fit for approval. I have found its lede and its opening paragraphs to contain inaccuracies and irrelevant or misleading statements and I am attempting to rectify those shortcomings. Comment and criticisms will be welcome. Nick Gardner 21:47, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

I have completed my revision of the lede, history and politics sections, and I now plan to start a rewrite of the economy paragraph.Nick Gardner 06:06, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

I don't consider the paragraphs on devolution and law to be of an acceptable standard of clarity, balance and accuracy. Would somebody else care to overhaul them? Nick Gardner 21:22, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

OK, I've had a go myself - mainly by removing rambling passages, updating data, and repairing the lack of citations. I believe that we need to do more on those lines before the article could be considered fit for approval. Help would be welcome.Nick Gardner 22:54, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Parliamentary sovereignty in Scottish law

I can probably find some secondary sources given time, but the well-known primary source is the obiter dictum of the then Lord President of the Court of Session, Lord Cooper of Culross, in MacCormick v Lord Advocate (1953: SC 396, SLT 255): “the principle of unlimited sovereignty of Parliament is a distinctively English principle and has no counterpart in Scottish constitutional law”. Peter Jackson 10:25, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

The Lord President was presumably referring to the sovereignty of the Scottish Parliament. It is hard to see how Scottish law could have any bearing on the sovereignty of the UK parliament. Nick Gardner 21:09, 18 February 2012 (UTC)