Talk:Schröder-Bernstein property/Draft: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Boris Tsirelson (→Three remarks: reply) |
imported>Boris Tsirelson |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
--[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 23:55, 25 September 2010 (UTC) | --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 23:55, 25 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
: "noncommutative counterpart" — on one hand, I am waiting for a book from our library about this point; but on the other hand, it is anyway beyond the form "If X is similar to a part of Y and also Y is similar to a part of X then X and Y are similar (to each other)" and only inspired by it. | :1. "noncommutative counterpart" — on one hand, I am waiting for a book from our library about this point; but on the other hand, it is anyway beyond the form "If X is similar to a part of Y and also Y is similar to a part of X then X and Y are similar (to each other)" and only inspired by it. | ||
: "relation to antisymmetry of order" — you are right, this should be noted. | :2. "relation to antisymmetry of order" — you are right, this should be noted. | ||
: "structure by (sub)headings" — I also feel the need, but the article is so short, I do not see which headings; do you? [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 06:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC) | :3. "structure by (sub)headings" — I also feel the need, but the article is so short, I do not see which headings; do you? [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 06:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:23, 26 September 2010
Three remarks
Nice, Boris. I have only minor comments:
- I think the "noncommutative counterpart" needs some more explanation.
- What do you think of discussing the relation to antisymmetry of order?
- What about more structure by (sub)headings?
--Peter Schmitt 23:55, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- 1. "noncommutative counterpart" — on one hand, I am waiting for a book from our library about this point; but on the other hand, it is anyway beyond the form "If X is similar to a part of Y and also Y is similar to a part of X then X and Y are similar (to each other)" and only inspired by it.
- 2. "relation to antisymmetry of order" — you are right, this should be noted.
- 3. "structure by (sub)headings" — I also feel the need, but the article is so short, I do not see which headings; do you? Boris Tsirelson 06:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)