Talk:Schröder-Bernstein property/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Boris Tsirelson
imported>Boris Tsirelson
Line 9: Line 9:
--[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 23:55, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
--[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 23:55, 25 September 2010 (UTC)


: "noncommutative counterpart" — on one hand, I am waiting for a book from our library about this point; but on the other hand, it is anyway beyond the form "If X is similar to a part of Y and also Y is similar to a part of X then X and Y are similar (to each other)" and only inspired by it.
:1. "noncommutative counterpart" — on one hand, I am waiting for a book from our library about this point; but on the other hand, it is anyway beyond the form "If X is similar to a part of Y and also Y is similar to a part of X then X and Y are similar (to each other)" and only inspired by it.
: "relation to antisymmetry of order" — you are right, this should be noted.
:2. "relation to antisymmetry of order" — you are right, this should be noted.
: "structure by (sub)headings" — I also feel the need, but the article is so short, I do not see which headings; do you? [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 06:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
:3. "structure by (sub)headings" — I also feel the need, but the article is so short, I do not see which headings; do you? [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 06:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:23, 26 September 2010

This article has a Citable Version.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A mathematical term used to describe properties that have the same structure as the Schröder-Bernstein theorem of set theory. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Mathematics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Three remarks

Nice, Boris. I have only minor comments:

  1. I think the "noncommutative counterpart" needs some more explanation.
  2. What do you think of discussing the relation to antisymmetry of order?
  3. What about more structure by (sub)headings?

--Peter Schmitt 23:55, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

1. "noncommutative counterpart" — on one hand, I am waiting for a book from our library about this point; but on the other hand, it is anyway beyond the form "If X is similar to a part of Y and also Y is similar to a part of X then X and Y are similar (to each other)" and only inspired by it.
2. "relation to antisymmetry of order" — you are right, this should be noted.
3. "structure by (sub)headings" — I also feel the need, but the article is so short, I do not see which headings; do you? Boris Tsirelson 06:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)