User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/COASP 2010/Prototypes: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen
m (update)
imported>Daniel Mietchen
m (link)
Line 11: Line 11:
|
|
*A few [http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Publishing_original_research#Publishing_in_wiki_media exist], but most of them barely so.
*A few [http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Publishing_original_research#Publishing_in_wiki_media exist], but most of them barely so.
*The most notable one is [http://www.scholarpedia.org/ '''Scholarpedia'''], exclusively publishing review articles, typically by ''the'' experts in the field.
*The most notable one is [http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Special:Journal '''Scholarpedia'''], exclusively publishing review articles, typically by ''the'' experts in the field.
|
|
*'''Wikipedia'''
*'''Wikipedia'''

Revision as of 07:55, 20 August 2010


The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.


Session start · Talk start · Quotes · Background · Wikis as science communication platforms ·
Wikis as platforms for Open Access publishing · Prototypes · Editorial policies · Guided tour ·
Obstacles · Alternatives · Outlook · Summary · Slides · Video · Q & A · Demo


Wiki journals Wiki encyclopedias Traditional journals with wiki elements Other scholarly uses of wikis
  • A few exist, but most of them barely so.
  • The most notable one is Scholarpedia, exclusively publishing review articles, typically by the experts in the field.
  • Wikipedia
  • Citizendium
  • Encyclopedia of Earth
  • Encyclopedia of Cosmos
  • Encyclopedia of Life
  • Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  • RNA Biology
Guidelines for authors (progress report)
  • Lab notebooks, e.g. OpenWetWare
  • Lab reports: Lab reports
See also Can Computers Help Scientists With Their Reading?
  • Publication lists (incl. supplementary materials and in principle direct links to the raw data)