User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/Integrating wikis with scientific workflows/Introduction: Difference between revisions
imported>Daniel Mietchen (started) |
imported>Daniel Mietchen (+one more) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<blockquote>'' | ;;;<blockquote>''What if everyone in the world were in your lab – a ‘hive mind’ of sorts, but composed of countless creative intellects rather than mindless worker ants, and one in which resources, reagents and effort could be shared, along with ideas, in a manner not dictated by institutional and geographical constraints?'' | ||
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::''([http://dmm.biologists.org/content/2/5-6/201 Chris Patil and Vivian Siegel])'' | |||
</blockquote> | |||
| Line 10: | Line 12: | ||
;;;<blockquote>'' | ;;;<blockquote>''While scientists have gloried in the disruptive effect that the Web is having on publishers and libraries, with many fields strongly pushing open publication models, we are much more resistant to letting it be a disruptive force in the practice of our disciplines. ([http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MIS.2007.93 James Hendler])'' | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
<blockquote>''The Internet represents an opportunity to change this system, one which has created a 300-year-old, collective long-term memory, into something new and more efficient, perhaps adding in a current, collective short-term working memory at the same time. With new online tools, scientists could begin to share techniques, data and ideas online to the benefit of all parties, and the public at large. ([http://orbitingfrog.com/blog/2009/06/16/open-science/ Robert J. Simpson], paraphrasing [http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/indepth/38904 Michael Nielsen])'' </blockquote> | |||
Revision as of 19:46, 5 May 2010
Science is already a wiki if you look at it a certain way. It’s just a highly inefficient one — the incremental edits are made in papers instead of wikispace, and significant effort is expended to recapitulate existing knowledge in a paper in order to support the one to three new assertions made in any one paper.
What if everyone in the world were in your lab – a ‘hive mind’ of sorts, but composed of countless creative intellects rather than mindless worker ants, and one in which resources, reagents and effort could be shared, along with ideas, in a manner not dictated by institutional and geographical constraints?
There is but one journal: The scientific literature. (Richard Gordon)
While scientists have gloried in the disruptive effect that the Web is having on publishers and libraries, with many fields strongly pushing open publication models, we are much more resistant to letting it be a disruptive force in the practice of our disciplines. (James Hendler)
The Internet represents an opportunity to change this system, one which has created a 300-year-old, collective long-term memory, into something new and more efficient, perhaps adding in a current, collective short-term working memory at the same time. With new online tools, scientists could begin to share techniques, data and ideas online to the benefit of all parties, and the public at large. (Robert J. Simpson, paraphrasing Michael Nielsen)