User:ElectionJune2014/Referenda/2: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Peter Jackson
imported>John Stephenson
(Formatting)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- Please ignore (but don't delete) any formatting that you are not familiar with. Others will probably chime in to help you set things up. -->
'''Only the proposer of the referendum and Election Committee members may modify this page. Substantive modifications by the proposer after the referendum has been formally proposed at '[[User:ElectionJune2014/Referenda|June 2014 Referenda]]' will invalidate the signatures of any current supporters, and require them to sign again. Comments should be placed on the Talk page.'''
<!--
Start your new article by replacing these lines! If it is your first one, you may have a look at [[CZ:Quick Start]], and if you cannot find it, just press the "Save page" button below this edit window &mdash; it will then be linked from here. Click 'show preview' to check your work and see what all the symbols do.


Include the title of your article in the opening paragraph ("A '''wug''' is a...") and highlight it in bold by using three quote marks either side '''like this'''. Two are for ''italics''. Insert references like so.<ref>This is a reference.</ref> Links to other articles go in double square brackets (see above). URLs take [http://en.citizendium.org single square brackets].
If the table of contents gets in the way, move it where you want by including the TOC template. (Curly brackets {} indicate a template.)
{{TOC|right}}
{{TOC|right}}


Mark subtitles with an increasing number of equals signs either side:
==Managing Editor to Serve Temporarily As Approvals Manager-in-Chief, June 2014==
 
==History of wugs==
This section illustrates subtitle marks.
===Early history===
So does this.
====Ancient period====
And this.
=====Origins=====
This too. Five's the limit.
 
==Footnotes==
{{reflist|2}} -->


<!--We don't add Wikipedia-like 'categories' (e.g. '[[Category:History]]') to the text of articles at Citizendium because these are automatically added by the software once you've filled in the Metadata page for an article. You can add this via http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Special:MetadataForm if you wish.-->
''Proposed by [[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony Sebastian]] 00:01, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 
=='''Proposed by:'''==
[[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 00:01, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 
=='''Managing Editor to Serve Temporarily As Approvals Manager-in-Chief'''==


Because of the paucity of active and interested Editors, the current formal protocol for approving articles (http://ec.citizendium.org/wiki/EC:R-2011-027) cannot function. Without Editors to evaluate and approve or not approve articles requested for consideration of approval, the Citizendium cannot claim that approved articles have been vetted by experts.
Because of the paucity of active and interested Editors, the current formal protocol for approving articles (http://ec.citizendium.org/wiki/EC:R-2011-027) cannot function. Without Editors to evaluate and approve or not approve articles requested for consideration of approval, the Citizendium cannot claim that approved articles have been vetted by experts.
Line 42: Line 20:


*This referendum does not require modification of the Charter.
*This referendum does not require modification of the Charter.
===Notes===
*This proposal can also be discussed on the [http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,4539.msg46606.html forum].
[[Category:Citizen-initiated referenda]]
[[Category:Elections]]

Revision as of 11:10, 5 June 2014

Only the proposer of the referendum and Election Committee members may modify this page. Substantive modifications by the proposer after the referendum has been formally proposed at 'June 2014 Referenda' will invalidate the signatures of any current supporters, and require them to sign again. Comments should be placed on the Talk page.

Managing Editor to Serve Temporarily As Approvals Manager-in-Chief, June 2014

Proposed by Anthony Sebastian 00:01, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Because of the paucity of active and interested Editors, the current formal protocol for approving articles (http://ec.citizendium.org/wiki/EC:R-2011-027) cannot function. Without Editors to evaluate and approve or not approve articles requested for consideration of approval, the Citizendium cannot claim that approved articles have been vetted by experts.

Accordingly, until the Managing Editor and the Citizendium Council decide and agree that a sufficient number of active and interested Editors are available for vetting articles requesting approval, the Managing Editor will serve as Approvals Manager in Chief with the responsibility of personally evaluating articles requested for approval, and deciding whether to approve them or not. All decisions may be overridden by the Citizendium Council.

  • In evaluating articles requested for consideration of approval, the Approvals Manager in Chief will fact-check the article, evaluate it for coherent narrative flow, compare its content and quality with comparable articles in other encyclopedias, including Wikipedia and Encyclopedia Britannica online (premium edition). The Approvals Manager in Chief will prepare a written summary of his or her evaluation. The Approvals Manager in Chief will consult with other Citizens as to the adequacy of the evaluation. The Approvals Manager in Chief may request other Citizens who have excellent track records in excellent writing to evaluate articles for approval, which the Approval Manager in Chief will decide whether to approve the article or not approve it.
  • In addition to overriding any of the Approval Manager in Chief’s approvals, the Citizendium Council may suggest articles that appear ready for consideration of approval.
  • Editors may continue to review and evaluate articles and approve high quality articles that treated topic adequately, as specified in the Charter, article 15.
  • This referendum does not require modification of the Charter.

Notes

  • This proposal can also be discussed on the forum.