Template talk:UK: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Derek Harkness m (typo) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
With the adoption of subpages, I don't think such templates are going to be necessary. They have always struck me as getting in the way, more clutter than helpful. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 01:03, 22 July 2007 (CDT) | With the adoption of subpages, I don't think such templates are going to be necessary. They have always struck me as getting in the way, more clutter than helpful. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 01:03, 22 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
I ditto the above. Plus it's to a large extent just a duplication of [[Subdivisions of the United Kingdom]] which could also be moved so that it is at [[United Kingdom/Subdivisions]] or something similar. I think quite a large number of list, catalog, bibliography, and similar pages could get moved to subpages. [[User:Derek Harkness|Derek Harkness]] 01:31, 22 July 2007 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:32, 22 July 2007
With the adoption of subpages, I don't think such templates are going to be necessary. They have always struck me as getting in the way, more clutter than helpful. --Larry Sanger 01:03, 22 July 2007 (CDT)
I ditto the above. Plus it's to a large extent just a duplication of Subdivisions of the United Kingdom which could also be moved so that it is at United Kingdom/Subdivisions or something similar. I think quite a large number of list, catalog, bibliography, and similar pages could get moved to subpages. Derek Harkness 01:31, 22 July 2007 (CDT)