Talk:Aromatic hydrocarbons: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Milton Beychok m (→Started this article as a stub: Fixed "Good work" response to Nathaniel) |
imported>Henry A. Padleckas (→Started this article as a stub: suggest "Theoretical considerations" to be covered in Aromatic compounds) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::Good start, Nathaniel. I am going to upgrade the status to a 2 (Developing article) on the metatdata template ... and I will await your further development of this article. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 22:45, 2 November 2010 (UTC) | ::Good start, Nathaniel. I am going to upgrade the status to a 2 (Developing article) on the metatdata template ... and I will await your further development of this article. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 22:45, 2 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
::I plan to take the "Theoretical considerations" header out of here, and leave this article pretty much to the practical aspects of aromatic hydrocarbons. I think aromatic theory should be discussed in its own article not written yet, called [[Aromatic compounds]] (or maybe something similar). See my comment at [[Talk:Hydrocarbons#Aromatic]]. <br>[[User:Henry A. Padleckas|Henry A. Padleckas]] 05:49, 29 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
== The [[Aromatic heterocycles]] link you added into the Related Links subpage == | |||
Nathaniel, I converted that link into the form we use at CZ for links in the Related Links subpages. Just look at the edit page for the Related articles to see the template we use. | |||
Then I also converted the resulting red (unwritten) link to a black "lemma" article which is what we call definition-only articles. Someday, when you have the time, I will explain how to create lemma articles ... it is not something you need to learn as yet. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 06:56, 3 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:49, 28 November 2012
Started this article as a stub
Nathaniel Gunby expressed an interest in writing this article and asked for help in getting it started. So I started the article for him. I also created two of the subpages for him. Milton Beychok 17:25, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
- All right, basics are done. Images, history, and theory will be added over the next couple of weeks.Nathaniel Gunby 22:03, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
- Good start, Nathaniel. I am going to upgrade the status to a 2 (Developing article) on the metatdata template ... and I will await your further development of this article. Milton Beychok 22:45, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
- I plan to take the "Theoretical considerations" header out of here, and leave this article pretty much to the practical aspects of aromatic hydrocarbons. I think aromatic theory should be discussed in its own article not written yet, called Aromatic compounds (or maybe something similar). See my comment at Talk:Hydrocarbons#Aromatic.
Henry A. Padleckas 05:49, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
- I plan to take the "Theoretical considerations" header out of here, and leave this article pretty much to the practical aspects of aromatic hydrocarbons. I think aromatic theory should be discussed in its own article not written yet, called Aromatic compounds (or maybe something similar). See my comment at Talk:Hydrocarbons#Aromatic.
The Aromatic heterocycles link you added into the Related Links subpage
Nathaniel, I converted that link into the form we use at CZ for links in the Related Links subpages. Just look at the edit page for the Related articles to see the template we use. Then I also converted the resulting red (unwritten) link to a black "lemma" article which is what we call definition-only articles. Someday, when you have the time, I will explain how to create lemma articles ... it is not something you need to learn as yet. Milton Beychok 06:56, 3 November 2010 (UTC)