Talk:Bond (finance): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Robert W King No edit summary |
imported>Hayford Peirce (you're right -- I misread the year! Sorry) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
This article was apparently written in Feb. 2007 by a student as part of a U. project and then slightly edited by two authors with no apparent expertise in the field. The first paragraph was parent nonsense and I have revised it. The rest of the article may well be more of the same -- could someone with some knowledge of the field take a look at it. It may need major revision or maybe just minor rewriting. Or maybe it should be deleted entirely. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 11:42, 10 February 2008 (CST) | This article was apparently written in Feb. 2007 by a student as part of a U. project and then slightly edited by two authors with no apparent expertise in the field. The first paragraph was parent nonsense and I have revised it. The rest of the article may well be more of the same -- could someone with some knowledge of the field take a look at it. It may need major revision or maybe just minor rewriting. Or maybe it should be deleted entirely. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 11:42, 10 February 2008 (CST) | ||
:It's being written this year. Please check the history pag emore carefully. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 11:44, 10 February 2008 (CST) | :It's being written this year. Please check the history pag emore carefully. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 11:44, 10 February 2008 (CST) | ||
::geez, you're right! I misread the year! But that still doesn't change my comments. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 11:48, 10 February 2008 (CST) |
Revision as of 11:48, 10 February 2008
This is an Eduzendium page.
This article was apparently written in Feb. 2007 by a student as part of a U. project and then slightly edited by two authors with no apparent expertise in the field. The first paragraph was parent nonsense and I have revised it. The rest of the article may well be more of the same -- could someone with some knowledge of the field take a look at it. It may need major revision or maybe just minor rewriting. Or maybe it should be deleted entirely. Hayford Peirce 11:42, 10 February 2008 (CST)
- It's being written this year. Please check the history pag emore carefully. --Robert W King 11:44, 10 February 2008 (CST)
- geez, you're right! I misread the year! But that still doesn't change my comments. Hayford Peirce 11:48, 10 February 2008 (CST)