Talk:ASIMO/Draft: Difference between revisions
imported>Peter Schmitt (Asking for / suggesting an article for approval is done by {{subst:Call for review|~~~~}}) |
imported>Peter Schmitt (→Approval Process: {{ApprovalProcess|call}}: starting the review process) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== Approval Process: {{ApprovalProcess| | == Approval Process: {{ApprovalProcess|review}} == | ||
''Call for review: ''Chunbum Park 02:48, 21 December 2011 (UTC) | ''Call for review: ''Chunbum Park 02:48, 21 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
''Call for Approval: '' | ''Call for Approval: ''[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 01:18, 22 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
''Approval Notice: '' | ''Approval Notice: '' | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
''Please discuss the article below, [[{{BASEPAGENAME}}/Approval]] is for brief official referee's only!'' | ''Please discuss the article below, [[{{BASEPAGENAME}}/Approval]] is for brief official referee's only!'' | ||
=== Comments === | === Comments === | ||
This article is certainly worth to be examined for Approval. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 01:18, 22 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:18, 21 December 2011
Reference to Isaac Asimov
Honda officially claims that "ASIMO" is not a reference to Isaac Asimov. So is the name merely a coincidence? Anyone with a high school diploma should be able to figure out that this is not the case; I think it's more appropriate to write in the introduction that ASIMO is named after Isaac Asimov than to echo the "contrary to popular belief...." (Chunbum Park 02:25, 1 November 2009 (UTC))
What does a gyroscope do?
Is this correct?
gyroscope [ used to determine ] the overall orientation relative to the ground horizon
(Chunbum Park 23:41, 27 October 2011 (UTC))
Approval Process: Review period
Call for review: Chunbum Park 02:48, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Call for Approval: Peter Schmitt 01:18, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Approval Notice:
Certification of Approval:
Please discuss the article below, ASIMO/Approval is for brief official referee's only!
Comments
This article is certainly worth to be examined for Approval. --Peter Schmitt 01:18, 22 December 2011 (UTC)