User:Nick Gardner /Sandbox: Difference between revisions
imported>Nick Gardner |
imported>Nick Gardner No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
The term human rights is nowadays applied to a concept that emerged in the 17th century, which differed from earlier human rights concepts in the implication that it should apply to every human being, regardless of nationality, sex or age. (It could be argued that the concept should stated as "'universal' human rights" in order to distinguish it from the earlier and more limited concepts). It was given expression in declarations that may have been intended at the time as rejections of the tyrannical practices of former regimes, but were to become widely accepted as universal criteria of civilised governance | The term human rights is nowadays applied to a concept that emerged in the 17th century, which differed from earlier human rights concepts in the implication that it should apply to every human being, regardless of nationality, sex or age. (It could be argued that the concept should stated as "'universal' human rights" in order to distinguish it from the earlier and more limited concepts). It was given expression in declarations that may have been intended at the time as rejections of the tyrannical practices of former regimes, but were to become widely accepted as universal criteria of civilised governance | ||
==Declarations== | ===Declarations=== | ||
==Objections== | ===Objections=== | ||
==Organisations== | ==Organisations== | ||
Revision as of 15:23, 5 August 2012
Index and Glossary
There is an index to the topics dealt with in the economics articles here, and a glossary of economic terms here.
See also the index to the politics articles .
Concepts
The term human rights is used to refer to one of two mutually exclusive mental constructs:
- an ethical construct denoting entitlements that are deemed to be rightfully inherent in the existence of every human being, and whose rightful existence is deemed to be independent of other considerations; or,
- a social construct denoting entitlements that are to be conferred upon individuals by the community and which are to be subject to socially-determined limitations that include those arising from conflicts of interest with other individuals.
The best-known example of its use as an ethical construct is in the American Declaration of Independence which took it to be "self-evident" that everyone had "certain inalienable rights". Its use in that sense cannot be put into practical operation because it is definitionally precluded from meeting the operational need to resolve conflicts of human rights. The need to resolve such conflicts would normally require the entitlement to be conditional upon additional factors beyond those that are deemed inherent in human existence, as a result of which the rights would cease to be absolute or "inalienable". Those additional factors concern what are deemed to be the rightful relation between the entitlements of an individual and those of other members of the community, the inclusion of which is a feature of social constructs such as those of the nine United Nations human rights conventions.
Background
Origins
The term human rights is nowadays applied to a concept that emerged in the 17th century, which differed from earlier human rights concepts in the implication that it should apply to every human being, regardless of nationality, sex or age. (It could be argued that the concept should stated as "'universal' human rights" in order to distinguish it from the earlier and more limited concepts). It was given expression in declarations that may have been intended at the time as rejections of the tyrannical practices of former regimes, but were to become widely accepted as universal criteria of civilised governance