Talk:Mauna Kea: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Drew R. Smith |
imported>Hayford Peirce (→problem with conversion from feet to meters: the easy solution) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:::Seriously, I have no idea how to fix that. And as for it "lousing up the metric figure" thats because the article was written in american english, therefore metric was the unit to be converted to. The template displayed the converted from figure, then got confused because it didnt know what to do with a comma. If the metric unit were the unit being converted from it would have shown up normally.[[User:Drew R. Smith|Drew R. Smith]] 23:13, 31 July 2009 (UTC) | :::Seriously, I have no idea how to fix that. And as for it "lousing up the metric figure" thats because the article was written in american english, therefore metric was the unit to be converted to. The template displayed the converted from figure, then got confused because it didnt know what to do with a comma. If the metric unit were the unit being converted from it would have shown up normally.[[User:Drew R. Smith|Drew R. Smith]] 23:13, 31 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::Well, then, we gotta get rid of the template and just use our pocket calculators and then type in the two figures. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 23:56, 31 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:56, 31 July 2009
I removed
1. REDIRECT [[Template:Coordinates/{{{11}}}]]
from the top of the page, which required removing a lot of mark-up, (some of) which may need to be put back - ??? Ro Thorpe 18:46, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Oh wow, that was my fault. I was messing with the Coordinates template and forgot to fix it.Drew R. Smith 00:15, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- How's that look Ro?Drew R. Smith 00:18, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
problem with conversion from feet to meters
I know that people have been playing around with this but I haven't paid any attention until now. You're gonna have to refine things. I just now tried to change, in the text, 33000 feet to 33,000, which is how it should be, and that loused up the *metric* figure. Go figure. But please try to fix it -- this is not something that is just going to be confined to one volcano in Hawaii.... Hayford Peirce 01:55, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- Good point. When we were making the conversion template we weren't really thinking about large figures. There's got to be a way to fix that, but I don't have the foggiest idea how. I'll talk to Caesar and see if he can figure something out.Drew R. Smith 04:35, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- Puh-leeze! something's gotta be done! Maruru! (as we say in Tahiti) Hayford Peirce 04:59, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- Seriously, I have no idea how to fix that. And as for it "lousing up the metric figure" thats because the article was written in american english, therefore metric was the unit to be converted to. The template displayed the converted from figure, then got confused because it didnt know what to do with a comma. If the metric unit were the unit being converted from it would have shown up normally.Drew R. Smith 23:13, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- Well, then, we gotta get rid of the template and just use our pocket calculators and then type in the two figures. Hayford Peirce 23:56, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Geography Category Check
- Earth Sciences Category Check
- Developed Articles
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Geography Developed Articles
- Geography Advanced Articles
- Geography Nonstub Articles
- Geography Internal Articles
- Earth Sciences Developed Articles
- Earth Sciences Advanced Articles
- Earth Sciences Nonstub Articles
- Earth Sciences Internal Articles
- Geography Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Earth Sciences Underlinked Articles