CZ:Ref:DOI:10.1038/438900a: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen
m (started)
 
imported>Daniel Mietchen
m (+link to discussion)
 
Line 9: Line 9:
  | doi = 10.1038/438900a
  | doi = 10.1038/438900a
}}
}}
:A widely cited and criticized study which compared the accuracy of [[42]] entries each in the English [[Wikipedia]] and the [[Encyclopaedia Britannica]], concluding that both had similar numbers of factual errors.
:A widely cited and [http://www.nature.com/nature/britannica/index.html debated] study which compared the accuracy of [[42]] entries each in the English [[Wikipedia]] and the [[Encyclopaedia Britannica]], concluding that both had similar numbers of factual errors.

Latest revision as of 19:34, 25 June 2009

Giles, J. (2005), "Internet encyclopaedias go head to head", Nature 438: 900–901, DOI:10.1038/438900a [e]

A widely cited and debated study which compared the accuracy of 42 entries each in the English Wikipedia and the Encyclopaedia Britannica, concluding that both had similar numbers of factual errors.