CZ Talk:Subgroups: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Russell D. Jones m (CZ Talk:Proposals/Subgroups moved to CZ Talk:Subgroups: As per Editorial Council Resolution 0014) |
imported>Tom Kelly No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Needs similar subgroups? == | |||
just thought of medical physiology. I made the home page for the [[CZ:Cardiovascular Subgroup]] and it is pending approval of Biology and Health Sciences workgroups. It is best fit for Health Sciences, however, physiologists are more like biologists... aren't they? So, in the case of the Cardiovascular Subgroup, I would say it would be nice in the template if we could LINK over to the [[CZ:Physiology Subgroup]] since no workgroup exists for it at this time. | |||
:maybe we could call it "sister subgroups" or "related subgroups" [[User:Tom Kelly|Tom Kelly]] 22:15, 5 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
==jogging articles to get the tags to work== | |||
note to self to add bit about jogging articles to this page to get the tags to refresh in the workgroup categories. [[User:Tom Kelly|Tom Kelly]] 22:15, 5 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:15, 5 April 2009
Needs similar subgroups?
just thought of medical physiology. I made the home page for the CZ:Cardiovascular Subgroup and it is pending approval of Biology and Health Sciences workgroups. It is best fit for Health Sciences, however, physiologists are more like biologists... aren't they? So, in the case of the Cardiovascular Subgroup, I would say it would be nice in the template if we could LINK over to the CZ:Physiology Subgroup since no workgroup exists for it at this time.
- maybe we could call it "sister subgroups" or "related subgroups" Tom Kelly 22:15, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
jogging articles to get the tags to work
note to self to add bit about jogging articles to this page to get the tags to refresh in the workgroup categories. Tom Kelly 22:15, 5 April 2009 (UTC)